Anti Vaxxers are toast x
Should the drunk be allowed to make decisions, for others, assuming that he can't make clear judgments? Some are power drunk.
You weren't practicing informed consent, because you didn't know the ingredients or their side effects. Most ironically, though, you thought that you should speak for other people, in your lack of situational awareness.
There are form letters, now, which conscientious objectors will hand to the doctor, so that the doctor will have to sign it. He has to acknowledge the ingredients, their known, measured, and accepted side effects. There's just a very small chance, that he will be held legally liable, right? Probably, nothing will happen. So, he should risk the expensive settlement. He should stand by his beliefs, if they are sincere.
You, however, will not have to acknowledge the ingredients, or their known side effects. You will not have to stand by any of your own claims, which you are making so cheaply.
"Little" and "far greater" is subjective language. What is the chance. Who says so. In what respect is the scientist held legally-accountable, for these statistics; it affects the safety of others.
What happened, when the vaccine went wrong. We should want to make sure that never happens, again.
Has any harm been admitted, ever? How do people deal with that, formally.
You're being responsible, right? How do we hold you to it?
Why not. What where these wealthier, better-educated, and un-vaccinated people doing, when they survived an epidemic.
You spoke to the effect of her having autistic freakouts. Could that be your fault?
Even under the most conservative assumptions, a vaccine can cause fever.
You can justify any random human rights abuse, on the grounds that you were in danger.
If it came to that, I would physically resist forced injections (of who knows what) as a matter of self defense.
Many of these questions, I have asked innocently, since my first year of biology. The teacher looked at me, like a deer, in the headlights. Why not just say, maybe, it's in the library. You will have to tell us. That is knowable, even, if it hasn't been discovered, yet. Maybe, you will be the one to find out.
Most often, it is not even accusatory. I am asking what do we know, and how do we know it.
Say that it's customary, and you take it on faith, without calling other people ignorant. What's wrong with that?
Don't answer, if you don't have anything constructive to add, and, particularly, don't issue ultimatums --
How do you tell whether it is attenuated, in other words, dead, or in in some diminished capacity. What is the threshold, at whichsome small quantity of live virus becomes contagious, and how do we know that, before in injecting it, into our bodies.
Because of the uniform and the certificates, on the wall.
Last edited by friedmacguffins on 17 Jun 2017, 9:30 am, edited 2 times in total.
jrjones9933
Veteran
Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Should the drunk be allowed to make decisions, for others, assuming that he can't make clear judgments? Some are power drunk.
You weren't practicing informed consent, because you didn't know the ingredients or their side effects. Most ironically, though, you thought that you should speak for other people, in your lack of situational awareness.
There are form letters, now, which conscientious objectors will hand to the doctor, so that the doctor will have to sign it. He has to acknowledge the ingredients, their known, measured, and accepted side effects. There's just a very small chance, that he will be held legally liable, right? Probably, nothing will happen. So, he should risk the expensive settlement. He should stand by his beliefs, if they are sincere.
You, however, will not have to acknowledge the ingredients, or their known side effects. You will not have to stand by any of your own claims, which you are making so cheaply.
"Little" and "far greater" is subjective language. What is the chance. Who says so. In what respect is the scientist held legally-accountable, for these statistics; it affects the safety of others.
What happened, when the vaccine went wrong. We should want to make sure that never happens, again.
Has any harm been admitted, ever? How do people deal with that, formally.
You're being responsible, right? How do we hold you to it?
Why not. What where these wealthier, better-educated, and un-vaccinated people doing, when they survived an epidemic.
You spoke to the effect of her having autistic freakouts. Could that be your fault?
Even under the most conservative assumptions, a vaccine can cause fever.
You can justify any random human rights abuse, on the grounds that you were in danger.
If it came to that, I would physically resist forced injections (of who knows what) as a matter of self defense.
Many of these questions, I have asked innocently, since my first year of biology. The teacher looked at me, like a deer, in the headlights. Why not just say, maybe, it's in the library. You will have to tell us. That is knowable, even, if it hasn't been discovered, yet. Maybe, you will be the one to find out.
Most often, it is not even accusatory. I am asking what do we know, and how do we know it.
Say that it's customary, and you take it on faith, without calling other people ignorant. What's wrong with that?
Don't answer, if you don't have anything constructive to add, and, particularly, don't issue ultimatums --
How do you tell whether it is attenuated, in other words, dead, or in in some diminished capacity. What is the threshold, at whichsome small quantity of live virus becomes contagious, and how do we know that, before in injecting it, into our bodies.
Because of the uniform and the certificates, on the wall.
I will make something abundantly clear to you: my daughter is autistic because I am autistic. It has absolutely nothing to do with the vaccines she was given. I am autistic because my dad almost certainly was. My dad had been born in rural eastern Washington back in 1921, when the old west was hardly a decade or two past, and so he was never vaccinated for anything. And yet, I am confident had he been officially diagnosed, he'd have been labeled an Aspie. So much for vaccines causing autism.
Doctors have never denied that a tiny few have had adverse reactions to vaccinations, but the good far outweighs the harm, while harm by not vaccinating far outweighs the good. And a kid might get a fever? Big deal; I'd rather have a living kid who needs a children's aspirin to risking death of said child due disease that can be vaccinated against in the first place.
In closing: do not accuse me of doing harm to my child again.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
You were not taking a calculated risk, because you were willfully ignorant, when put on the spot. You could have just as easily opened up another browser window, and pretended to know what you were talking about.
Genes can be triggered. Bits and pieces of dead housecats, creepy crawly things, and toxic waste might have been the trigger. If it makes you feel bad, then, you have a soul. Face the music. Try harder, next time.
I am not just saying things, matter-of-fact-ly, to get on your nerves. I am accountable and expect other people to be accountable. Take ownership, over yourself, your dependents, and what you do. I have blisters, and my back hurts. I have spent my money, worn out lots of shoes, workgloves, and taken chances, knowingly. If you believe in anything you say, pay a price, don't be so flippant.
What was she injected with, that you stand by. Is it associated with autism, or have any accidents been reported. It is knowable. Get off your limbo, or leave me out of it, plz, ftlog.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Genes can be triggered. Bits and pieces of dead housecats, creepy crawly things, and toxic waste might have been the trigger. If it makes you feel bad, then, you have a soul. Face the music. Try harder, next time.
I am not just saying things, matter-of-fact-ly, to get on your nerves. I am accountable and expect other people to be accountable. Take ownership, over yourself, your dependents, and what you do. I have blisters, and my back hurts. I have spent my money, worn out lots of shoes, workgloves, and taken chances, knowingly. If you believe in anything you say, pay a price, don't be so flippant.
What was she injected with, that you stand by. Is it associated with autism, or have any accidents been reported. It is knowable. Get off your limbo, or leave me out of it, plz, ftlog.
Let me put it this way: a friend told me about an incident where a couple went to a doctor to have their child vaccinated. Just before he could stick the needle in, the little girl had had a seizure. As the doctor said later, if he had given the girl the vaccination just a minute before, there was no way on earth he could have convinced the parents that the vaccination hadn't caused the seizure. The moral of the story is, just because one thing follows another, that doesn't mean that you have a cause and effect.
Or another example: back in the 18th century, a crackpot French doctor asked various patients who had lost their sight if they had ever masturbated. When he learned that they all in fact were masturbators, he came to the conclusion that masturbation leads to blindness. Needless to say, it does not, or the whole human race would be in the dark.
Just because autistic children had been vaccinated hardly means that vaccinations led to autism. It hadn't caused my daughter to be autistic, and it hadn't caused me to be, either. Besides, those suspicious ingredients in vaccines, such as mercury, are no longer used; certainly not when my daughter was vaccinated. And even if there was a connection, I'd much prefer a living autistic child to an NT child who had died due to an illness easily preventable with vaccines.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Some of us aren't afraid of science, and I'm certainly not going to risk the health of the mass majority of children.
You may not like my answer, but that's what you're getting.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Despite those ingredients - or maybe because of them - vaccines work. Good enough for me.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
I don't feel shame, over the inconsequential things, but this is life and death, if we are to believe anything you say -- a blithe, lukewarm, reprobation, even to the point of brain damage.
A very tiny minority of people are taking a health risk if they use Tylenol, as in these individuals that medicine could cause bloody vomiting. Regardless, I'm still going to use Tylenol, as the benefits far outweigh the risks.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
The concoction injected into both my daughter and me, saving us from dangerous diseases - and which hadn't caused our already existing autism.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... cc480b80ce
This reveals something about Trump's racial prejudices that he would rather have kept quiet.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Widespread anti-AfD protests in Germany |
20 Jan 2024, 11:08 pm |
George RR Martin Calls out Anti-Fans |
10 Feb 2024, 10:33 am |