StinkyDog wrote:
In a long distance relationship with Stefan Molyneux?
If he has Jewish family, it is possible. Regardless, I wouldn't consider it an insult.
friedmacguffins wrote:
Many accusations made by the Nazi[s] [sic] were objectively-true.
karathraceandherspecialdestiny wrote:
And what parts of what the Nazis had to say about other groups of people were objectively true, pray tell?
This ought to be good...
They sit down, to a Sabbath dinner, in nice clothes. There is some silverware, and a roast is cooking. A govt agent is prowling the neighborhood, smelling the air, and notices the Jewish house has food. He starts pounding on the door. So, the family has to hide everything and dresses down. Objectively speaking, this film had been made by the Nazis, themselves. Here is what they have said about themselves, in their own propaganda. Is the agent really breaking up some den of vice? It looks like a nice, dignified house, they are describing.
It's bad, only in the light that they have taken it from others.
Other accusations involved their investment, not in a doomsday machine. Not in moral vices, necessarily. Just that they invest is considered a form of rent seeking. Rent seeking is supposed to be wrong. They show financial preference, to their own families and social institutions, which is put in a bad light. Inheritances are made out to be seditious.
Regardless of which video was intended to be shown, leftist and rightist interests, in our time, use the same methods against eachother, up to and including internment and forced service. There are extreme examples, on both sides, as politics always tends toward logical extremes, the punchier it gets. It's just called something different, when you do it.
Trump has specifically said that he has structured his business dealings, for the maximum, legal tax advantages, and, has publicly dealt with foreign countries, whether or not we consider them to be ethical. As a matter of specious reasoning, we can say that these are all illegal acts.
It requires you not to believe in such a thing as sanctity, sanctity of society, the state, and personal privacy. If you want to be objective and abstract, so there are no such things as morals or politics or dignity, you can then drag those things through the dirt.
I can use anything. Works just like mad libs. You can turn the characters on the back of a cereal box, or Chucky Cheese, into some social justice narrative. That's all we're doing. I'm so used to it, by now, I thought the association between Trump and Nazi's was intentional, as per Godwin's Law.
This was just as clear and concise as I expected it to be.