CNN: Execs to Review All Russia Stories After Retraction
And, they haven't been doing this so far?!? Yep. It shows.
_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,237
Location: Long Island, New York
In the late 00's I edited Wikipedia on a somewhat regular basis. They had a list of what media was considered reliable and what was not. It was all about fact checking, not hyper-partisanship. An organization can slant their news like crazy while having strict fact checking. You were allowed to use the Jerusalem Post as a reliable source of Israeli military actions. Fox News was considered a reliable source.
Because of a lot of layoffs and competition from social media pressure them to get the story out now fact checking is way less pretty much everywhere.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
https://www.google.com/search?q=fox+adm ... e&ie=UTF-8
In my opinion whatever news source caters to right or left bias is fake tabloid news, and news sources like Reuters, AP and NPR are real news.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
https://www.google.com/search?q=fox+adm ... e&ie=UTF-8
Sure, I'll give you that they've admitted their f*ck ups. But look at that sheer number of f*ck ups! And most of those admissions of "errors" come across as purposeful untruths and vindictive lies, compared to mainstream news outlets like CNN that makes usually unintended mistakes.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
jrjones9933
Veteran
Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage
Having high editorial standards, and removing employees who violate them points to responsible journalism. Why is this story being spun as evidence of a problem? It's evidence of problem solving.
_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade
https://www.google.com/search?q=fox+adm ... e&ie=UTF-8
Sure, I'll give you that they've admitted their f*ck ups. But look at that sheer number of f*ck ups! And most of those admissions of "errors" come across as purposeful untruths and vindictive lies, compared to mainstream news outlets like CNN that makes usually unintended mistakes.
https://www.google.com/search?q=fox+adm ... mits+error
At a general glance it looks about the same on both sides to me.
To me both just seem too glitzy, splashy, flashy, celebrity magazine looking, lots of fluff, stuff like that. I just want pure dry unadulterated news.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
https://www.google.com/search?q=fox+adm ... e&ie=UTF-8
Sure, I'll give you that they've admitted their f*ck ups. But look at that sheer number of f*ck ups! And most of those admissions of "errors" come across as purposeful untruths and vindictive lies, compared to mainstream news outlets like CNN that makes usually unintended mistakes.
https://www.google.com/search?q=fox+adm ... mits+error
At a general glance it looks about the same on both sides to me.
To me both just seem too glitzy, splashy, flashy, celebrity magazine looking, lots of fluff, stuff like that. I just want pure dry unadulterated news.
Looking good for ratings is one thing, but allowing perception of the facts to be warped by ideology is quite another.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
jrjones9933
Veteran
Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage
This story is also relevant to this topic, and makes the same argument that I did in a previous post.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opin ... story.html
Saying the story did not meet the network's editorial standards, CNN pulled it from the website the night after it was published and apologized to Scaramucci. The network then accepted the resignations of the three journalists involved in the piece.
That doesn't sound like something a fake news network would do. It sounds like a news organization taking swift responsibility for screwing something up and journalists taking responsibility for their actions.
Scaramucci seemed to think so as well, responding via Twitter: "CNN did the right thing. Classy move. Apology accepted. Everyone makes mistakes. Moving on."
CNN has not said the story itself is false, only that they prematurely promoted it as true.
_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade
If you weren't reviewing your cable subscription, a long time before, there is nothing more I can say to fix you. Please go sit in the corner.
But, if you have followed this cheesy soap opera for long enough, you would remember that Hillary had first threatened Russia, over Server-gate.
Could you also retract the crisis actors, who could not stay in character, and the really bad (like, Rocky and Bullwinkle bad) surnames. There is a saying about 'central casting.' It might have been an improvement, over improv. Bang, ding, ow.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
But, if you have followed this cheesy soap opera for long enough, you would remember that Hillary had first threatened Russia, over Server-gate.
Could you also retract the crisis actors, who could not stay in character, and the really bad (like, Rocky and Bullwinkle bad) surnames. There is a saying about 'central casting.' It might have been an improvement, over improv. Bang, ding, ow.
Clinton was just supposed to let Russian attempts to derail her go unanswered?
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Do you have a keen memory, AS people? Most movie characters and other fictional narratives are derivative, rip-offs.
If you are so smart, make me a better man.
What is a falsifiable burden of proof, showing whether they literally tried to derail her.
Also, did she not say that Server-gate was a Russian cyber-attack, pertaining to critical infrastructure.
The whole line of discussion seems to be recycled, a casus belli.
I personally find it questionable, that vital interests or, say, driverless cars, should be on the internet.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,739
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
If you are so smart, make me a better man.
What is a falsifiable burden of proof, showing whether they literally tried to derail her.
Also, did she not say that Server-gate was a Russian cyber-attack, pertaining to critical infrastructure.
The whole line of discussion seems to be recycled, a casus belli.
I personally find it questionable, that vital interests or, say, driverless cars, should be on the internet.
You've been given example after example of Russian interference time and time again, and so I know nothing I say will satisfy you.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
The political administration, and advertising company, have thrown their mouthpieces, under the bus.
I guess, these people could have been re-purposed to say something useful or nice, put on a new face (pun intended) without ruining their credibility.
But, it was like a soap opera or media production, where some phony character is written out of the script.
Most people are not asking any intelligent questions, about what should replace them. What would be the new narrative or political dynamic, now that this is a done, dead horse.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Trump would let Russia attack allies who don't pay enough |
16 Feb 2024, 4:34 pm |
Russia’s 2024 election interference has already begun |
26 Feb 2024, 6:22 pm |
Does anyone have links to a balanced review of Devon Price w |
25 Jan 2024, 6:35 pm |
Russia developing space-based nukes to target US satellites |
18 Feb 2024, 5:19 pm |