"Capitalism is just human nature."

Post Reply New Topic

Backed by several psychological studies, the alt-right actually usually falls left-of-center on the political spectrum. This is reinforced by concepts such as playing the Devil's advocate and postmodernism. Trump's intelligence should most certainly not be underestimated considering that anonymous were the ones who worked tooth-and-nail to get him elected. The biggest problem with the liberal elite is that, while educated, they suffer from tunnel vision and underestimate the intelligence of those they project themselves on. Probably the biggest problem with socialism is that it has nationalistic roots, but lacks the protectionism to back that nationalism, causing them to collapse socially into a state of apathy. This is evidenced in European countries, specifically Scandinavian countries, where rates of happiness are dropping at exponential rates with the alarming rise in rates of immigration. In order for a globalist society to be effective in terms of sustainable development, it falls on the shoulders of the people to think as socialists would under the Neoliberal system. In order for individuals to thrive in a truly multicultural society, one must accept and endure the hardships associated with it, promoting healthy social boundaries for themselves to compensate for an open borders policy. Socialism ultimately gives way to globalism by its very nature and it is therefore an ill-advised practice due to the fact that it is a natural precursor to the enemy we would call a one world government. If globalism is inevitable, then there must absolutely be an emphasis on personal and individual rights.

Boy howdy! There is so much wrong here!

From Wikipedia:

"Any of a group of later political philosophies such democratic socialism and social democracy which do not envisage the need for full state ownership of the means of production nor transition to full communism, and which are typically based on principles of community decision making, social equality and the avoidance of economic and social exclusion, with economic policy giving first preference to community goals over individual ones".

That has immigration written all over it. Admittedly, I misspoke earlier in that I should have said "blogs". However, in such socialist societies, blogs would be given the same respect as studies due to the nature of Social Darwinism and community decision making in general. Having said that, I shouldn't have to link to any "actual" studies as we are seeing the effects of political polarization every day around the world. Social sciences in general are largely about how humans interact with one another, so there is a lot of gray area when it comes to the concept of community decision making in general. What I DO have (and what is more applicable to this particular situation) is a blog with a psychological study contained within it.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/li ... -alone#_=_

It is a scientific fact that perception does not match reality. Knowing that, it is self-evident that postmodernism is, by it's very nature, a product of extrovert culture, which ironically is what leads to social exclusion in the first place. I strongly support the notion that individualism should be considered a basic human right.

DarthMetaKnight:

I never said that playing the Devil's advocate was a product of postmodernism. Playing the Devil's advocate is actually much more closely related to "the Cult of Kek" (read trolling). Postmodernism much more closely relates to the scientific fact that an individual's perception does not necessarily match with reality.

No, that isn't what I'm referring to. That is only a fragment of what I'm referring to. 4chan and Encyclopedia Dramatica are other facets of the same machine. Either way, "Who's who" is besides the point (as is a trademark of Anonymous). The point is that internet culture in general played a large role in getting Trump elected.

You clearly misread what I said. I stated that the educated liberal elite (intelligent or not) project themselves on the masses (intelligent or not). The liberal elite are the ones I'm accusing of having tunnel vision. What they don't realize is that their agenda will ultimately be their own undoing once the masses wise up to their game. They thrive on narcissistic supply just as many of the masses do. (note that saying that does not mean I'm implying the masses are stupid. I did say that Trump's intelligence should not be underestimated, did I not?)

Keywords: "roots" and "for a long time". Philosophically, it is the same. The problem is that it doesn't support itself due to human nature and it eventually dissolves into a totalitarian government.

They have a very high standard of living, true, but that does not necessarily equate to happiness. With nothing to unite them, they can become lonely and miserable quite easily. Hence the aforementioned decline into globalism.

Yes it is. It is a threat to democracy. In terms of globalism, a one world government is contrasted to the ideology of a cosmopolitan democracy. A one world government is literally defined as the entire planet being run by a dictator.

I do not disagree that corporate corruption needs to be managed, but this needs to be done in a tactful manner. This is an interesting article I came across a while ago that tries to dissect this complicated matter:

http://www.ceylontoday.lk/print20170401 ... p?id=19559

To a certain extent, Capitalism is human nature---but to precisely equate the two is grossly simplistic.