Public land Confederate statues: No compromise?

Page 1 of 2 [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

10 Sep 2017, 4:57 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Raptor wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
Raptor wrote:
It's more the reason for their removal than anything, and that reason is they (those who are the driving force) are pissed off at Trump and his voters. It's no use trying to get me to believe that after all these years these these statues are suddenly an urgent issue. I smell sour loser all over it.
People need to face up to the fact their girl Hilary lost to Donald J.



The far-right keeps coming back to this, it seems as though they might be the ones obsessed with $hillary. You don't hear too many folks on the left who are enthusiastic for her, just a few centrists and media hacks.


Most of the Trump voters weren't and still arent too enthusiastic about him either but by listening to the cawing of the left you'd think anyone that voted for him is a dyed in the wool jackbooted Nazi or KKK grand dragon (or whatever)
Of course, I've become fond of being the left's villain so I actually enjoy all the labels.
:P


That's actually quite fair and more than a little frustrating. Not every Trump voter is/was a Trump supporter (and not all Trump supporters fall into the nationalist camp, let alone the white nationalist/white supremacist camp), many of them just voted for the least horrible looking s**t sandwich, just like many $hillary voters.

It also leads to another frustrating aspect with politics these days, it seems as though many people can't conceive that their opponents sincerely believe in the positions they espouse so they insist they're either trolling or paid and use that to excuse their own tendencies to troll their opponents. Back-and-forth it goes leaving more and more of us convinced the opposition just believes what they believe in order to antagonize us. It's also possible that establishment politicians and some in the media (both mainstream and beyond) like to take advantage of this by keeping the attention on relatively trivial issues that have a strong partisan split to keep partisans who might agree on some issues distracted from where they agree and focused on less important issues (meanwhile the establishment politicians advance their shared agenda).


I'm both cynical and pragmatic.
Politicians are dirtbags and the ones that arent will be, given enough time in office. Power corrupts.
I don't listen to campaign speeches or debates and think that anyone that takes to heart any election campaign promise also believes in Santa Clause and the Easter Bunny.

My biggest concern over Trump was actually that he wasn't a politician. I know that sounds contradictory to what I said, but with a candidate that's held office you can at least look at thier record to see how they've voted on the issues and which bills they've introduced. Their past record in office is as close to the proverbial acid test as we can get.

With Trump we were getting a pig in a poke, but with Hillary we were getting someone who should be in a federal pen and is generally a b***h. The b***h thing goes back to her sh***y treatment of secret service agents as first lady. So much for championing the working class, eh...


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

10 Sep 2017, 5:27 pm

Raptor wrote:
0_equals_true wrote:
Raptor wrote:
But the Confederacy has been dead for over 150 years so whatever actual allegiance is only out of nostalgia.


Doesn't matter the principle is the same. There shouldn't be insignia unrelated to their role as US state facility.


Whatever little actual allegiance there is left will die out of natural causes (i.e. time).


You are missing the point, it is about principle if you make one exception the whole principle is derailed.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

10 Sep 2017, 5:31 pm

The allegiance is symbolized by the correct insignia and the absence of incorrect insignia. Testing incorrect insignia for supporters of some other allegiance is not required and pointless.

There is a responsibility in is role as as state institution or government to represent the state, any suggestion otherwise whether or not it has credible support goes against this principle.

It is very difficult to measure support in the future, and it would not be a politically neutral activity to do this. Such adornment are against the interest of the state



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,504
Location: Right over your left shoulder

10 Sep 2017, 5:46 pm

Raptor wrote:
So much for championing the working class, eh...


I wouldn't expect an elitist corporocrat centrist to care about working people beyond their votes. Hillary isn't a populist of any sort, she isn't 'left wing', she's certainly not a socialist by any valid definition of the term, she works for Wall St, just like at least half of both major US parties.

This cycle we were guaranteed a scandal-ridden criminal was going to be elected, it was just a matter of whether or not they had a political track record as well.


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う


K_Kelly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 2014
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,452

10 Sep 2017, 6:18 pm

What I am seeing is that many on the left must be extremely low people to mock those or the viewpoints of those who they oppose by calling them every name in the book (*) or calling them dangerous lunatics and suggesting that they are in hysterics about our direction as a country, when there a lot of fair, legitimate reasons for their "warning" that isn't based in mental illness or sadism. Of course, there are those on the right who I don't really enjoy either, so I guess I'll try top stop trying to defend only the right from now on as much as I have. I will say, at least the right side of that coin doesn't pretend to be something they are not.

* I'm surprised we still "have" to teach preschool or kindergarten students manners today.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

10 Sep 2017, 6:25 pm

0_equals_true wrote:
The allegiance is symbolized by the correct insignia and the absence of incorrect insignia. Testing incorrect insignia for supporters of some other allegiance is not required and pointless.

There is a responsibility in is role as as state institution or government to represent the state, any suggestion otherwise whether or not it has credible support goes against this principle.

It is very difficult to measure support in the future, and it would not be a politically neutral activity to do this. Such adornment are against the interest of the state


I've made my point clearly enough here and that point has merit. If I have to go any further and lead you by the hand you won't like the way I do it. Besides, there's not a statue of Robert E. Lee at the Palace of Westminster or the stars and bars flapping in the breezes over Scotland Yard so I fail to see what interest all this is to a Londoner.
Happy trails...


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

10 Sep 2017, 6:38 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
Raptor wrote:
So much for championing the working class, eh...


I wouldn't expect an elitist corporocrat centrist to care about working people beyond their votes. Hillary isn't a populist of any sort, she isn't 'left wing', she's certainly not a socialist by any valid definition of the term, she works for Wall St, just like at least half of both major US parties.

This cycle we were guaranteed a scandal-ridden criminal was going to be elected, it was just a matter of whether or not they had a political track record as well.


I have no illusions about any politician being for my interests, or anyone else, or any group except for the votes. Money talks and BS walks. Trump is further right than Clinton and Clinton is further left than Trump and nothing more when it comes to political spectrum.

I would personally like to put more stock in third party candidates but the bottom line is that they lack the funding for the campaigning needed to win votes. As stated before, I could care less about their campaigning, baby kissing, and false promise making but I'm just one vote and too many other Americans are foolishly swooned by all that glitter and showmanship.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Last edited by Raptor on 10 Sep 2017, 8:55 pm, edited 2 times in total.

funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,504
Location: Right over your left shoulder

10 Sep 2017, 6:39 pm

K_Kelly wrote:
What I am seeing is that many on the left must be extremely low people to mock those or the viewpoints of those who they oppose by calling them every name in the book (*) or calling them dangerous lunatics and suggesting that they are in hysterics about our direction as a country, when there a lot of fair, legitimate reasons for their "warning" that isn't based in mental illness or sadism. Of course, there are those on the right who I don't really enjoy either, so I guess I'll try top stop trying to defend only the right from now on as much as I have. I will say, at least the right side of that coin doesn't pretend to be something they are not.

* I'm surprised we still "have" to teach preschool or kindergarten students manners today.


Accurately labelling someone as racist or misogynistic based on the beliefs they consistently espouse isn't name-calling, it's an honest description. I guess it's not politically correct to call a spade a spade any more?


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う


K_Kelly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 2014
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,452

10 Sep 2017, 8:16 pm

funeralxempire wrote:
K_Kelly wrote:
What I am seeing is that many on the left must be extremely low people to mock those or the viewpoints of those who they oppose by calling them every name in the book (*) or calling them dangerous lunatics and suggesting that they are in hysterics about our direction as a country, when there a lot of fair, legitimate reasons for their "warning" that isn't based in mental illness or sadism. Of course, there are those on the right who I don't really enjoy either, so I guess I'll try top stop trying to defend only the right from now on as much as I have. I will say, at least the right side of that coin doesn't pretend to be something they are not.

* I'm surprised we still "have" to teach preschool or kindergarten students manners today.


Accurately labelling someone as racist or misogynistic based on the beliefs they consistently espouse isn't name-calling, it's an honest description. I guess it's not politically correct to call a spade a spade any more?


People just find people being offended to usually be offensive in itself. Please don't bring left vs. right into this specifically.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,504
Location: Right over your left shoulder

11 Sep 2017, 12:07 am

K_Kelly wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
K_Kelly wrote:
What I am seeing is that many on the left must be extremely low people to mock those or the viewpoints of those who they oppose by calling them every name in the book (*) or calling them dangerous lunatics and suggesting that they are in hysterics about our direction as a country, when there a lot of fair, legitimate reasons for their "warning" that isn't based in mental illness or sadism. Of course, there are those on the right who I don't really enjoy either, so I guess I'll try top stop trying to defend only the right from now on as much as I have. I will say, at least the right side of that coin doesn't pretend to be something they are not.

* I'm surprised we still "have" to teach preschool or kindergarten students manners today.


Accurately labelling someone as racist or misogynistic based on the beliefs they consistently espouse isn't name-calling, it's an honest description. I guess it's not politically correct to call a spade a spade any more?


People just find people being offended to usually be offensive in itself. Please don't bring left vs. right into this specifically.


I didn't bring left vs. right into this, I brought up that the goal is to stifle fair criticism. Some people don't like when a spade gets called a spade and will have no choice but to learn to deal with it.


_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う