Male disposability in life & dating

Page 22 of 25 [ 393 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25  Next

magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

20 Oct 2017, 12:31 am

Okay, now I see the source of misunderstanding between me and SilverBoltsisWmax:
They was talking about dating sites, I was talking about real life.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 32,886
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

20 Oct 2017, 2:47 am

magz wrote:
Okay, now I see the source of misunderstanding between me and SilverBoltsisWmax:
They was talking about dating sites, I was talking about real life.


To the crocodiles!



magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

20 Oct 2017, 3:04 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
magz wrote:
Okay, now I see the source of misunderstanding between me and SilverBoltsisWmax:
They was talking about dating sites, I was talking about real life.


To the crocodiles!

Dating site, social media or real life crocodiles?


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


Sometime World
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 155
Location: UK

26 Oct 2017, 6:49 am

It's completely insane that in modern society, male unattractiveness (which includes plain looks) is not a concern for inequality and oppression, but all those other things are like feminism, blacks, mexicans, muslims, LGTB, etc.

As far as I am concerned it invalidates all the liberal movements since they refuse to even accept this is an issue at all, much less advocate on it's behalf.

It is completely absurd.

At this point is has been proven beyond a doubt, looks are of incredible importance for males to be able to have relations with women in the modern age.

Due to female liberation & feminism and its knock-on effect; the de-valuation of men, male value is now solely within the realms of things like being really good looking or having raw sexual prowess like height, athleticism and muscles. Males are no longer necessary in any other way other than reproduction and romantic companionship, due to female independence, although this independence is a scam since it's still supported by men, but functionally speaking it doesn't matter.

Essentially males have shifted from being a provider based value to nothing other than pleasure based value.

It is a free sexual market now, dictated by female instead of male standards and it's the law of the jungle. May the best man win.

What is insulting to me though is that liberals hate law of the jungle for everyone else, but when it comes to men that aren't born hot, they fully and completely support it. What a bunch of little as*holes they are.


_________________
Life had kept him waiting, regretting his pain inside. Had to feel underrated, and hated, besides. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvLVSPPLZZY


OutsideView
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Oct 2017
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,022
Location: England ^not male but apparently you can't change it

26 Oct 2017, 7:03 am

Sometime World wrote:
Males are no longer necessary in any other way other than reproduction and romantic companionship

In what way have females ever been necessary beyond reproduction and sex?


_________________
Silence lies steadily against the wood and stone of Hill House. And we who walk here, walk alone.


magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

26 Oct 2017, 7:09 am

OutsideView wrote:
Sometime World wrote:
Males are no longer necessary in any other way other than reproduction and romantic companionship

In what way have females ever been necessary beyond reproduction and sex?

Cooking and cleaning the house.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

26 Oct 2017, 7:40 am

You must be kidding, right. There have been many "useful" women throughout history. And in my life, too.

Females are people, just like males are people.

People weren't put on the earth to cater to one particular person's every whim.

People talk all kinds of crap here. People have to get out in the world more.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 32,886
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

26 Oct 2017, 7:57 am

magz wrote:
OutsideView wrote:
Sometime World wrote:
Males are no longer necessary in any other way other than reproduction and romantic companionship

In what way have females ever been necessary beyond reproduction and sex?

Cooking and cleaning the house.



Aren't you a Coder?



The Abdominal Snowman
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

Joined: 16 Oct 2017
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 66

26 Oct 2017, 8:15 am

Quote:
It's completely insane that in modern society, male unattractiveness (which includes plain looks) is not a concern for inequality and oppression, but all those other things are like feminism, blacks, mexicans, muslims, LGTB, etc.

Average female sexual value is much higher than average males (owing to sperm/egg bottleneck).
This is, ultimately, the source of all inequality between the sexes. Why misandry is always more conspicuous than misogyny throughout nature.
So the key to correcting this is in significantly increasing the ratio of females to males.
But how?
Not by actually making more females but instead using technology to create more female sex access for men than there are live females to go around.
That is being worked on as I type.
Porn was but the first salvo.



Last edited by The Abdominal Snowman on 26 Oct 2017, 8:30 am, edited 1 time in total.

The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 32,886
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

26 Oct 2017, 8:20 am

magz wrote:
OutsideView wrote:
Sometime World wrote:
Males are no longer necessary in any other way other than reproduction and romantic companionship

In what way have females ever been necessary beyond reproduction and sex?

Cooking and cleaning the house.



Actually, this time the feminists will take you to the crocodiles.



magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

26 Oct 2017, 8:37 am

I was kidding.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


OutsideView
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Oct 2017
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,022
Location: England ^not male but apparently you can't change it

26 Oct 2017, 8:52 am

And I wasn't actually meaning that females aren't necessary, just pointing out that they aren't more necessary than males (besides needing more females than males if you have to produce babies quickly).


_________________
Silence lies steadily against the wood and stone of Hill House. And we who walk here, walk alone.


Sometime World
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 155
Location: UK

26 Oct 2017, 8:57 am

The Abdominal Snowman wrote:
Quote:
It's completely insane that in modern society, male unattractiveness (which includes plain looks) is not a concern for inequality and oppression, but all those other things are like feminism, blacks, mexicans, muslims, LGTB, etc.

Average female sexual value is much higher than average males (owing to sperm/egg bottleneck).
This is, ultimately, the source of all inequality between the sexes. Why misandry is always more conspicuous than misogyny throughout nature.
So the key to correcting this is in significantly increasing the ratio of females to males.
But how?
Not by actually making more females but instead using technology to create more female sex access for men than there are live females to go around.
That is being worked on as I type.
Porn was but the first salvo.



There are cities in the UK with more women than men. Nottingham f.e. but it doesn't change the fact that average men are free from disposability if they move there. Women's nature will not change; average women that are thin and young enough to bare children, will look to date up in looks and that's been helped exceedingly since the invention of tech.

Using tech to give men more access to sex? Pornography has not worked, only created a short-term fix, and saved men money because its been freely available online. Men want the real thing. When you say tech do you mean robots/sex androids, VR? Don't you think women's rights groups will win in getting them banned?

They're already creating pseudo-babble fraud over lifelike sex dolls like saying it will lead to increases in rape and exploitation of women. There is no evidence to support these peoples outrageous claims. They are fraudulent and anti-male in nature to indoctrinate the masses.

And its not all about sex but being desired, liked, having shared interests, helping each other out. I want to bring her hot soup when she's ill in bed as a good gesture and sign I care, I expect the same to happen to me. I want to travel on holiday's and talk about the culture and history. Are men who are not blessed genetically with above average looks gonna have to do these things with a female created with artificial intelligence? That kind of technology won't exist in my lifetime. If it does, I'll be too old when it does.


_________________
Life had kept him waiting, regretting his pain inside. Had to feel underrated, and hated, besides. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvLVSPPLZZY


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 32,886
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

26 Oct 2017, 10:24 am

magz wrote:
I was kidding.


Tell that to the crocodiles.

In their tummies.



magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

26 Oct 2017, 10:37 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
magz wrote:
I was kidding.


Tell that to the crocodiles.

In their tummies.

Go, eat the crocodiles yourself!


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

26 Oct 2017, 11:49 am

Men can't live with women; and they can't live without them.

And vice versa.