Men's Discussion Forum
I'm not trying to decide what's right and wrong with the fat / unemployed posts, context matters and I'd need to see the relevant thread to do that.
But it seems to me calling the unemployed losers is worse than calling the fat losers. Your weight is entirely in your hands. Whether you have a job is not, you can take steps to improve your chances, but otherwise it's entirely in someone else's hands. Something we as autistics are especially keenly aware of. It doesn't matter if we're well suited to a job if we can't pass the interview. So we're losers for that? Most people here will be losers by that definition as most autistics are unemployed.
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,932
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Not according to some people. I've heard people chastise all unemployed for "refusing to work" as though there's no such thing as a person willing to work who couldn't find a job.
_________________
The days are long, but the years are short
Except that I didn't see anyone in the aforementioned thread calling unemployed men "losers."
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 32,872
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
You know B19; men have other men-topics to talk about which are entirely not related to women. So this is no excuse for not having men's forum.
Surprise!
^ The only reason we don't have a Men's Forum is because Alex doesn't want one.
I'd be fine with it. Seeing as most of WPs raving misogynists have long since departed (or been booted), I'm sure there's a lot of useful conversations that can occur.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
I'd be fine with it. Seeing as most of WPs raving misogynists have long since departed (or been booted), I'm sure there's a lot of useful conversations that can occur.
So why does Alex not want one?
Is there somewhere where he explains this so I can go have a read?
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,932
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Hi B19,
I agree with you, as you know about some of my beliefs already, but the guy does have a point - isn't me in a job and rich, you a poor loser just as inappropriate because it is offensive to those who cannot get a job or work full-time?
If one is chastised the other should be spoken to as well? Although, I do not know if this has already happened and apologise if this has already happened.
One is an opinion about appearance the other about status. Both worthy of considering or neither worth considering.
Justice and fairness should be practised with all.
This is the point I made in the first place about men having somewhere to go and be themselves just as women can. If a women ventures into this zone then at her own peril it be.
This is what is wrong with society at large. It’s being geared more towards helping womenproblems then men problems.
The Who dont hame fat women movement only helped fat wome. There was the movement to change how women are valued, but no movement to change how men are valued. Feminism has always fought to make women have more powe then men not equal. Or they’d fought to get rid of valuing men based on their job and income, they’d fought to not shame fat guys and to make being fat a s a guy social acceptable, there are no such movements. Women at large are content with how fat men are shamed and how men are valued based on their income status which is sad. For men not much has changed since 1950s and not much changed then from ,1780s. It’s be Stagnant but technology has greatly changed the way the world works, along with feminism making it so women work too, means far less good jobs for men. There isn’t enough good paying jobs for all men it’s impossible, every woman that works means a man can’t work. I’m all for women working but we need them to adjust the value of men based on their job and income. This isn’t 1950. It was a lot easier for men in 1950 as most women didn’t work. So it was easy to have a better job then most women. We as society really need to change how we value men.
Um yess it’s exactly that, apparently we use to have one, Alex removed it and doesn’t want it back.
Men’s forum would be like women’s so itds be a place with limited women posts wheremen could safely talks without women posting mean responses.
Men are allowed to post in the women’s section under limited basis and it can only be positive and can’t disagree with women posting there. Men would be same but for men.
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,932
Location: Adelaide, Australia
More dual income couples has greatly increased the average household income. Higher household incomes mean some commodities get more expensive, as people can now afford to pay more and they'll charge as much as they can get away with.
The ubiquity of dual income couples means other couples have to be dual income to keep up.
It also means single people will be at a monetary disadvantage unless they work two full time jobs.
_________________
The days are long, but the years are short
I'd be fine with it. Seeing as most of WPs raving misogynists have long since departed (or been booted), I'm sure there's a lot of useful conversations that can occur.
So why does Alex not want one?
Is there somewhere where he explains this so I can go have a read?
My understanding is that the Men's Forum didn't get much use, so he doesn't want to go through the bother of creating a new one.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,932
Location: Adelaide, Australia
You're covering old ground here.
My post and another stated types of issues that don't currently have a proper home.
Others do share your sentiments that at least some of those threads could be housed under other subs.
You appear to have self loathing of your own gender based on your earlier post in this thread. Is there any particular reason for this? I can understand why some might be indifferent to the idea of having the forum on a practical level but fail to understand why anyone would be for or against it on a personal level, as it is merely a tool not the wielder.
_________________
Yours sincerely, some dude.
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,932
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Have you been to many male-oriented forums? They're typically loaded with women.
I don't buy the argument that WrongPlanet basically defaults to a men's forum since more males are diagnosed. Some men might want to discuss certain things with other men, and they should have that space. I don't understand the reluctance, let alone the posts from men who say a men's forum isn't needed. If a man doesn't feel the need for a men's forum, don't vote for it. But why vote against other men having it?
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
The 'Random Discussion Forum' as 'an ice-breaker?' |
14 Mar 2024, 1:33 pm |
How do you search the forum to not repeat topics? |
02 Mar 2024, 8:41 am |