Question for women about men

Post Reply New Topic

I posted this in the men's discussion too, but that seems to be a bit of a dead space at times and I'm curious how this affects women's perspectives. So - I seem to run across advice for men of the following ilk way too often ---> https://www.menprovement.com/
It's just ... ick. But I can't really identify why. What do you think of this sort of advice to men? For the sake of argument, if you met a man who followed and personified all this advice and those of its kind, would you really be more inclined to find him attractive?
To me, this advice has several flaws -
1. It seems to be convinced that all women, 100%, are attracted to "alpha" men. Thus, all this advice is geared specifically towards turning men into that type. It assumes that all women prefer the most masculine, dominant, aggressive, competitive men. Which even I know is not the case.
2. It seems to cling desperately to very outdated social and gender roles, many of which I know women dislike in men, and which are actually harmful to them and to men themselves (emotional expression is a good example).
3. It seems that everything is based on strength and hypermasculinity, where women are seen as nothing more than "prizes," just validation that you're an "alpha" type and nothing more (and often women are ONLY referenced by their looks - things like "stop sleeping with average-looking women, and attract hot girls instead!" Now I am NOT saying that attraction doesn't exist, or you can't be attracted to women physically - just that at the risk of reading like a bullshitter, at least for me, there are things about a person, male or female, that attract me that are not solely dependent on their looks. I've proven this beyond doubt. So a "hot girl" isn't going to be more attractive to me than an "average-looking woman" if I am not interested in her or attracted to who she is as a person)
4. It's ALWAYS heteronormative -
I could go on. You get the idea.
I also tend to see men who are desperate to be "alpha" and have to assert their dominance all over the place as insecure people who rely on the validation of others, and to whom competition in order to bolster their own fragile ego is more important than cooperation, or the happiness of others around them. Hardly the sort of man who is going to attract me at least, whether I'm in a masculine or feminine presentation.
Plus, anyone who hates himself enough to take on this sort of program - it's going to be an act. A mask of the sort of man he thinks he should be, the sort of man he wishes he was, and not an honest reflection of who he is and that he's comfortable with that - which may very well be more attractive. I'm not asserting that you can't improve yourself with different ideas, but re-making yourself into this image of a stereotypical He-Man because you're told that's what women want seems misguided.
So, what do women think about this kind of advice?

shallow - supershallowdreaminfusion for men\ looks are glossy too

men are the new women, to frustrate and sell miracles to

I think it's stupid, but I also seem to have different standards than other women I know.
1. I am definitely not attracted to alpha-people. I'm attracted by nice people, and I rarely see that together with a stereotypical "alpha"-personality. One of the reasons I like my boyfriend so much is because he never acts like he's tougher, smarter or cooler than he is.
Most of my NT friends falls for those kind of "alpha"-guys though.

2. I don't give much thought to gender roles, but I easily fall into the part of the housewife. I think that's because cooking and cleaning are ways that I can express that I care about him. My (female) NT friends, they are pretty hypocritical about this topic. They will complain about gender roles, and demand the house-chores are divided equally and stuff like that, while they also want a strong-guy who will "treat them like a lady", with buying presents, take them out to dinner, compliment their looks and things like that. At least those are the things I hear them complaining about.

3/4. I'm more into androgynous people. That might be because I'm bisexual, but still. Hyper-masculine isn't something that attracts me, neither in men or women.

I agree that the men who try to act "alpha" are really just acting mean. You could definitely be tough and have a high self esteem and all that without acting like a jerk, but since the stereotype/ideal is what it is, guys seem to have a hard time figuring out the balance in how to be tough and nice at the same time. And I see no need for trying to find a balance like that anyway. Trying to act like you're something that you're not seems like a pain in the butt. In a way I feel sorry for the guys who does that, but it's hard to feel sorry for someone who's trying to dominate everyone and everything around them (this goes for women too).

Again, I like my boyfriend because he doesn't act like he's anything. He's not the nicest, definitely not the toughest, nor the smartest or most good looking person around. He's just a regular human and I happen to enjoy his company.

Alpha types make me nervous.
If I could go back in time and start over, I'd want a guy who was quiet, thoughtful, and with whom I shared common values.

In all fairness, I only read the titles of the articles.

However, it's worth it for men to know, anyone who repeatedly encourages men to use testosterone supplementation is not to be trusted. The only surefire thing that testosterone supplementation can possibly give you, is cancer:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16006887

The rest of the articles seem to also give unhealthy advice. You can find the same type of unhealthy advice pushed on females, and it takes time and effort to learn what articles are trustworthy, helpful, healthy, etc. Males, females, and everyone in between should always check the information they get against plenty of other sources, while trying to remember that everyone's mind and body respond differently to different foods/medicines/therapies/environments and whatnot.

Blanket acceptance of generalizations will get people in trouble, no matter their gender, age, health, etc.

Hey there! This may sound like a silly question and maybe it has been already asked, or this is a totally wrong thread, but how do you react when someone ignores you? It's actually not related to dating, but when someone who has expressed romantic interest in you, which you have rejected, and then later on that person starts ignoring you after you have set up a non-romantic meeting (equally initiated by both parties). To tell you the truth, I'm not interested in his motives or intentions, being that we are totally different and I'm not sure I even want to understand the other party involved (I know it sounds harsh), but what do you guys feel, how do you act, how do you spend your afternoon? Is obsessing over it an NT thing ("normal") and to what extent, according to your point of view? Thank you in advance!

I don't view men through any of those lenses, actually.

I like guys who are reserved, calm, impassive, and self-contained. Secure INTP or ISTP types (I know the 16 type model isn't a perfect model, but those descriptions are at least more precise than a two-type model of loud 'alpha' or touchy-feely 'beta'). I don't go for most extroverts or feelers. Men who are very loud, or very emotional/illogical, make me uncomfortable.

My spouse is either INTP or unusually subdued ENTP.

This PUA/red pill formula has led to shallow gratification for a lot of men; but I see it as a mask for insecurity and cowardice that paralyses growth and much like a drug, it leads men down the avoidance route.
One thing I'm certain of is that masking is not sustainable, it always comes at a cost.