Page 1 of 1 [ 8 posts ] 

billegge
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

Joined: 12 Sep 2017
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 147
Location: Lat: 27.889636 Long: -82.665982

18 Feb 2018, 7:15 pm

I score high on online tests for aspergers, now Alexithymia, ADD... and I am wondering if there is a test for "Normal", I would like to see if I score low on it.



IstominFan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Nov 2016
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,114
Location: Santa Maria, CA.

19 Feb 2018, 10:26 am

The closest thing is probably the ND/NT score test, out of 200, on this site.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,697
Location: the island of defective toy santas

19 Feb 2018, 3:52 pm

the amuurican test for normal [enough] is solid membership in the middle class.



NewTime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2015
Posts: 1,972

19 Feb 2018, 4:27 pm

billegge wrote:
I score high on online tests for aspergers, now Alexithymia, ADD... and I am wondering if there is a test for "Normal", I would like to see if I score low on it.


Yes. Go to your washing machine and set it on normal and then turn it on. You are testing to see if the normal setting on your washer works.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,697
Location: the island of defective toy santas

19 Feb 2018, 4:59 pm

this washing machine lacks a "normal" setting. it's digital, either on or off.



billegge
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

Joined: 12 Sep 2017
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 147
Location: Lat: 27.889636 Long: -82.665982

19 Feb 2018, 5:11 pm

IstominFan wrote:
The closest thing is probably the ND/NT score test, out of 200, on this site.


I guess this is what you mean, my score.
Image



lostonearth35
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jan 2010
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,881
Location: Lost on Earth, waddya think?

20 Feb 2018, 1:17 pm

Why should there a test for something that doesn't exist? :)



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,697
Location: the island of defective toy santas

20 Feb 2018, 4:34 pm

the existing tests go at it from the other side, that of comparative restrictions in capability. and if they can still use the term "handicap" in golf*, why can't they still use it to describe the disadvantages of people with various cognitive and physical restrictions which hamper their ability to cope in life?

*the number of strokes by which a golfer normally exceeds par for a course (used as a method of enabling players of unequal ability to compete with each other), e.g.
"his game struggles along in the 20-handicap range"