Why would my family say these bad things about marriage?

Page 2 of 5 [ 78 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

25 Feb 2018, 11:04 am

magz wrote:
Can I be brutal?

I guess they couldn't imagine you not wanting to get married and for whatever reason, they took your willing for granted.
And then, they may have evaluated your marriage-worthiness very low, so they tried to make you a humble servant just to have a chance for any married life.

That's not how healthy marriage works but according to your posts in another thread, your parents are enormously strict and controlling, so I guess they have very little idea of how healthy relationships work in general.

You're not brutal at all. You're actually pretty accurate.

First off, my family is very Blue Pill, which means they're naive to the realities of today's relationship between sexes at large (in the US, at least). Also, my parents' marriage was always far from happy, full of constant fighting and screaming, and never mellowed out until they were both well into old age. So "not knowing how healthy relationships work" could be accurate too.

Your comment about my marriage worthiness is interesting. When my family gave me compliments, it was always, and I mean always, about my intelligence or academics: "smart", "capable", "bright", etc. It was never about things that actually mattered among my peers and in society at large. To rub salt in the wound, my "smarts" quickly became a license for demanding nothing but utmost perfection in school, and punishing me for even a small mistake on my homework assignments.

Well, my family did compliment me on my appearance too, but I knew it didn't mean anything, because girls usually described me as "ew!". A few times, a therapist I was seeing gave me the same compliments, but they sounded so cringeworthy coming from her, I can't even find a word to describe it. Speaking of "ew!", now that I aged into my looks and got somewhat good at attracting women, most women my age are looking to get married now. And I have to work hard at keeping them out of my life, rather than bringing them into my life.



Last edited by Aspie1 on 25 Feb 2018, 1:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Closet Genious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2017
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,225
Location: Sweden

25 Feb 2018, 12:08 pm

My advice to you op would be this: Buy a dog.

Like yourself, I am very red pill. Once I'm done with university and residency, I dream of buying a house, and a couple of dogs, maybe a cat too. I think between work, my pets and my creative hobbies, I'll have enough on my plate.
If you like animals, this might be a way forward for you aswell. Dogs are amazing companions, always happy to see you and very loyal.



smudgedhorizon
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 293

25 Feb 2018, 1:14 pm

It's your choice. If you want to stay single, nobody will force you to get married.


_________________
Signature under construction.


magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

25 Feb 2018, 1:57 pm

I'm not much into the "red pill, blue pill" rhetorics, my parents are extremely traditional yet their relationship is based on mutual respect to the point I couldn't get what feminists were talking about until I learned more about other families. They believe their success in relationship is due to their traditionalism but I'm sure it's much more about their genuine love and respect towards each other. Yes, it really happens.

Nevertheless, I agree to you that remaining single is way better than falling into a toxic relationship.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


Esmerelda Weatherwax
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,749

25 Feb 2018, 2:45 pm

Hi Aspie1

Try a different Red Pill for just a second - I am not being snide here, just old, and sharing a perspective.

There are quite a few families in which one or both parents deliberately sabotage one child emotionally, so that child will never marry, so the parents will have a live in caregiver in their old age - or just a companion who can't leave them.

Not sure what your earning situation is, but you may want to ask yourself what your parents might gain from keeping you off the market.

Also, I'm not trying to persuade you to consider marriage or relationship. I just want you to consider the fact that marriage is not the only encumbrance you may need to concern yourself with.

I speak from direct experience here: had a parent who, in old age, tried to emotionally blackmail me into sacrificing my job and moving in with them, to be their unpaid maid-of-all-work. This, after having emotionally rejected and abused me (with emotional withholding and favoritism) for at least 20 years.

In a word, nope. I already had all the Tshirts I wanted from that.

Do give it some thought, the sanity you save may be your own.


_________________
"I believe you find life such a problem because you think there are the good people and the bad people," said the man. "You're wrong, of course. There are, always and only, the bad people, but some of them are on opposite sides."
-- Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!


Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

25 Feb 2018, 5:16 pm

Esmerelda Weatherwax wrote:
Try a different Red Pill for just a second - I am not being snide here, just old, and sharing a perspective.

There are quite a few families in which one or both parents deliberately sabotage one child emotionally, so that child will never marry, so the parents will have a live in caregiver in their old age - or just a companion who can't leave them.
First off, "different Red Pill" is coming off as a bit snide. But that's fine; I get it. It'd be better said if you said "try looking at it from a different angle". Otherwise, it sounds like something people in my extended family used to say. When I told them how my parents weren't giving me enough freedom, they said: "Listening to your parents is the best kind of freedom!" :? 8O Which is basically a non-sequitur.

I think you're wrong about the second part. My parents said they wanted me to get married someday, so it wouldn't make sense if they intentionally kept me from doing so. If anything, it was the extended family and my parents' friends who told me all these things about what marriage will be like. All while pressuring me to get married too.

In a nutshell, "freedom" was kind of a dirty word in my family. Which made the social studies classes, with their spiel on America being a free country :roll:, a giant slap in the face.



Closet Genious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2017
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,225
Location: Sweden

26 Feb 2018, 5:28 am

magz wrote:
I'm not much into the "red pill, blue pill" rhetorics, my parents are extremely traditional yet their relationship is based on mutual respect to the point I couldn't get what feminists were talking about until I learned more about other families. They believe their success in relationship is due to their traditionalism but I'm sure it's much more about their genuine love and respect towards each other. Yes, it really happens.

Nevertheless, I agree to you that remaining single is way better than falling into a toxic relationship.


I actually hate these terms, but to me a red piller is not a traditionalist. I actually dislike traditionalism even more than modern relationship dynamics. I'm not gonna bust my ass off everyday, just for a partner to sit on their behind at home.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 32,886
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

26 Feb 2018, 5:37 am

There's a third choice no one is talking about here: A non-cohabiting and non-committed relationship.

It fills needs that dogs cannot. :|



Closet Genious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2017
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,225
Location: Sweden

26 Feb 2018, 6:06 am

That would be the ideal, but those kinds of relationships don't grow on trees boo..

Thus 2 dogs and a sex doll is the second best option.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 32,886
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

26 Feb 2018, 6:26 am

^^ They grow on trees with the right demographic where you are generally seen attractive.

viewtopic.php?t=275336



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 32,886
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

26 Feb 2018, 6:54 am

Quote:
sex doll is the second best option.



This thing would scare me at night.



nick007
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,125
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in the police state called USA

26 Feb 2018, 7:13 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Quote:
sex doll is the second best option.



This thing would scare me at night.
It would scare me too but there's some guys like Dino-Mike who think they are the perfect girl :arrow:


_________________
"I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem!"
~King Of The Hill


"Hear all, trust nothing"
~Ferengi Rule Of Acquisition #190
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ru ... cquisition


Closet Genious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2017
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,225
Location: Sweden

26 Feb 2018, 9:16 am

I honestly don't see how sex with a doll would be much different. Maybe I've been unlucky, but all girls I've been with barely ever initiated anything in the bedroom. To the point where it started feeling like work.



Esmerelda Weatherwax
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,749

26 Feb 2018, 9:17 am

Aspie1 wrote:
Esmerelda Weatherwax wrote:
Try a different Red Pill for just a second - I am not being snide here, just old, and sharing a perspective.

There are quite a few families in which one or both parents deliberately sabotage one child emotionally, so that child will never marry, so the parents will have a live in caregiver in their old age - or just a companion who can't leave them.
First off, "different Red Pill" is coming off as a bit snide. But that's fine; I get it. It'd be better said if you said "try looking at it from a different angle". Otherwise, it sounds like something people in my extended family used to say. When I told them how my parents weren't giving me enough freedom, they said: "Listening to your parents is the best kind of freedom!" :? 8O Which is basically a non-sequitur.

I think you're wrong about the second part. My parents said they wanted me to get married someday, so it wouldn't make sense if they intentionally kept me from doing so. If anything, it was the extended family and my parents' friends who told me all these things about what marriage will be like. All while pressuring me to get married too.

In a nutshell, "freedom" was kind of a dirty word in my family. Which made the social studies classes, with their spiel on America being a free country :roll:, a giant slap in the face.


Yep, any mention of red pill anything by a female is going to risk being seen as snide, since the trope has been appropriated by a social movement that doesn't particularly like females (putting it mildly). Which is a shame, since the actual movie The Matrix isn't about gender roles or gender privilege, it's about the nature of reality as a whole. Anyway, that's why I included the disclaimer.

I'm not a point-belaborer, I don't see arguing as a legitimate form of entertainment; so it's pretty unusual for me to come back and respond after making a point. But: you're taking what your parents say as literally true, when they say they want you married. If they really did, they wouldn't be working so hard to present it as a bad thing. Which they are.

One of the hallmarks of any kind of controlling relationship is that the controlling person, or group, says one thing and does another, or says one thing one moment, and says the opposite thing soon thereafter. (Often when questioned about what they first said; this is called "countering".) Workplaces, for instance, always seem to promise advancement with their mouths, while their actual policies do everything possible to prevent it. Your family's opposition to the very word "freedom" is, TBH, a huge red flag. Their response about true freedom being absolute subjugation to their will? Makes me shudder and want to run. They're arogating to themselves the role of God.

Cf. "crazymaking". https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/co ... crazymaker

Anyway, I like your posts in general, and I do wish you well; none of this is intended to upset you or put you down; I'm trying to answer the question you posed in the thread title. And no, absolutely, I don't want to push you towards marriage. You know what you want, in that regard. I just suspect you'd like to be sure you've made up your own mind about it, without internalizing any manipulation. That makes total sense.


_________________
"I believe you find life such a problem because you think there are the good people and the bad people," said the man. "You're wrong, of course. There are, always and only, the bad people, but some of them are on opposite sides."
-- Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!


Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

26 Feb 2018, 10:19 am

Esmerelda Weatherwax wrote:
I'm not a point-belaborer, I don't see arguing as a legitimate form of entertainment; so it's pretty unusual for me to come back and respond after making a point. But: you're taking what your parents say as literally true, when they say they want you married. If they really did, they wouldn't be working so hard to present it as a bad thing. Which they are.

One of the hallmarks of any kind of controlling relationship is that the controlling person, or group, says one thing and does another, or says one thing one moment, and says the opposite thing soon thereafter. (Often when questioned about what they first said; this is called "countering".) Workplaces, for instance, always seem to promise advancement with their mouths, while their actual policies do everything possible to prevent it. Your family's opposition to the very word "freedom" is, TBH, a huge red flag. Their response about true freedom being absolute subjugation to their will? Makes me shudder and want to run. They're arogating to themselves the role of God.
I'd like to clarify yet again: It was my extended family who said those things: how my wife will control my every move, and how obedience is the best kind of freedom. My parents were actually pretty laissez faire about me getting married. They used phrases like "your wife" when talking about my future (until I told them I wanted no part of it), but that's about it. As for my dating life, it's something my family never discussed, since I never brought a girl home. They just vaguely knew I took dance lessons, danced with the women there, and occasionally went on dates.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 32,886
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.