Page 1 of 2 [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

ClosetAspy
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Female
Posts: 361

07 Oct 2008, 6:10 pm

I recently came across this quote by Einstein in "The God Effect" by Brian Clegg:

"This theory (quantum theory, which Einstein opposed) reminds me a little of the system of delusions of an exceedingly intelligent paranoic, concocted of incoherent elements of thought."

Well, Einstein has been proved wrong, or so modern physicists say; God does play dice with the universe. So, what kind of Designer do we have, when we speak of Intelligent Design? "An exceedingly intelligent paranoic?"

Could be. Could be. Be careful what you bring up, you could open up a whole new can of worms.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

07 Oct 2008, 6:22 pm

Einstein was pantheistic after high school and reading Hume...


But to answer the question of "what kind of Designer", let me ask you:

What kind of Designer would account for the astrophysics of this certain planet?
What kind of Designer would develop a type of nano-robotic system as exists in all known life?
What kind of Designer would be able to create mass and energy from His own power?
What kind of Designer would want to be friends with the creatures He made, but allows them to freely choose whether or not to be friends or not?
What kind of Designer would reveal Himself in history and manifest Himself as one of His creatures in order to die temporarily as the Sacrifice to redeem His creation back to Himself?



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 59,750
Location: Stendec

07 Oct 2008, 6:28 pm

The mere fact that Dr. Einstein may (or may not) have believed in God does not prove (or disprove) His existance.

Yes, Dr. Einstein has been proven wrong, but far less often than he's been proven right, since E still equals mc², and his theories of relativity have not been refuted.

ClosetAspie wrote:
So, what kind of Designer do we have, when we speak of Intelligent Design?

An intelligent designer, as is obvious from the context. Whether or not reality requires such a being is left entirely to conjecture, for according to Dr. Einstein himself, “A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be,” and “I am a deeply religious nonbeliever - this is a somewhat new kind of religion.”


_________________
 
No love for Hamas, Hezbollah, Iranian Leadership, Islamic Jihad, other Islamic terrorist groups, OR their supporters and sympathizers.


Last edited by Fnord on 07 Oct 2008, 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Psimulus
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 222
Location: Earth

07 Oct 2008, 6:36 pm

An in'tel'lig'ent de'sign'er? A de'sign'er of in'tel'lig'ence?


_________________
The infinite Universe is the divine essence. We are of the Universe.


Dogbrain
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 4 Aug 2008
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 290

07 Oct 2008, 10:15 pm

As the evolution of physics has shown us, God does play dice with the universe. He also hides the dice and cheats when adding up the pips.



Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 45,472
Location: Houston, Texas

08 Oct 2008, 7:22 am

Doesn't ID mean that something was created in a way that was so complex that science couldn't explain it?


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!

Now proficient in ChatGPT!


chever
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,291
Location: Earth

08 Oct 2008, 8:14 am

Image


_________________
"You can take me, but you cannot take my bunghole! For I have no bunghole! I am the Great Cornholio!"


monty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Sep 2007
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,741

08 Oct 2008, 8:23 am

chever wrote:
Image


Saucy!!



Loborojo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Aug 2008
Age: 64
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,242
Location: Negombo

08 Oct 2008, 10:01 am

Man's first Mistake :

On the first day, God created the dog and said:

'Sit all day by the door of your house and bark at anyone who comes in or walks past. For this, I will give you a life span of twenty years.'

The dog said: 'That's a long time to be barking. How about only ten years and I'll give you back the other ten?'

So God agreed.

On the second day, God created the monkey and said:

'Entertain people, do tricks, and make them laugh. For this, I'll give you a twenty-year life span.'

The monkey said: 'Monkey tricks for twenty years? That's a pretty long time to perform. How about I give you back ten like the Dog did?'

And God agreed.

On the third day, God created the cow and said:

'You must go into the field with the farmer all day long and suffer under the sun, have calves and give milk to support the farmer's family. For this, I will give you a life span of sixty years.'

The cow said: 'That's kind of a tough life you want me to live for sixty years. How about twenty and I'll give back the other forty?'

And God agreed again

On the fourth day, God created man and said:

'Eat, sleep, play, marry and enjoy your life. For this, I'll give you twenty years.'

But man said: 'Only twenty years? Could you possibly give me my twenty, the forty the cow gave back, the ten the monkey gave back, and the ten the dog gave back; that makes eighty, okay?'

'Okay,' said God, 'You asked for it.'

So that is why for our first twenty years we eat, sleep, play and enjoy ourselves. For the next forty years we slave in the sun to support our family. For the next ten years we do monkey tricks to entertain the grandchildren. And for the last ten years we sit on the front porch and bark at everyone.

Life has now been explained to you.

There is no need to thank me for this valuable information. I'm doing it as a public service.


_________________
Your Aspie score: 152 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 48 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie


carturo222
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 3 Aug 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,568
Location: Colombia

09 Oct 2008, 11:05 am

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
What kind of Designer would account for the astrophysics of this certain planet?


No designer needed for explaining that. In such a huge universe, small pockets of order are expected to arise.

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
What kind of Designer would develop a type of nano-robotic system as exists in all known life?


No designer needed for that. Darwinian evolution, revised by the work of modern biologists, suffices as an explanation.

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
What kind of Designer would be able to create mass and energy from His own power?


This begs the question of whence your purported designer came from.

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
What kind of Designer would want to be friends with the creatures He made, but allows them to freely choose whether or not to be friends or not?


... and punishes them to endless torture if they make a choice he doesn't like?

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
What kind of Designer would reveal Himself in history and manifest Himself as one of His creatures in order to die temporarily as the Sacrifice to redeem His creation back to Himself?


Let me see... what god would need to sacrifice himself to himself in order to appease himself for the mess he had made himself in the first place? Either one with a twisted sense of logic, or a sadist who doesn't want justice, only blood--whoever's.



Enough of this "God is good" BS. The whimsical, genocidal, megalomaniac god of the Bible is the worst role model you could choose.



oscuria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,748

09 Oct 2008, 11:09 am

Tolerance, people! You guys scream more against religion than Limbaugh does against idiots like yourself.

Makes me cry. :cry:


_________________
sticks and stones may kill you.


Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 98
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

09 Oct 2008, 11:11 am

If there is a God it's evident He's pretty stupid. Better to figure there isn't one. That way we can take the blame for the mess ourselves and maybe do something about it than blaming some idiotic fantasy.



ThatRedHairedGrrl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2008
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 912
Location: Walking through a shopping mall listening to Half Japanese on headphones

09 Oct 2008, 1:16 pm

Anyone thought of the parallel with human creativity? Because that's the closest and most obvious (if not indeed the only one - the jury, I believe, is out on whether other higher animals truly show it) example of creation we have.

How we create is by making something, seeing if it works, changing it if it doesn't, and sometimes ripping it up, chucking it in the trash and starting over. And we sometimes say 'Oh, the heck with it, I'm not going to worry over this any more, it'll do!'. And we often use bits of an old creation to rig up something new. And we quite often use things for purposes they were never intended for.

Maybe, like any human creator, God just did the best job he could under the circumstances, with the materials available. I know, I know, God's supposed to have made the materials. But he presumably gave them the qualities they have because he couldn't do otherwise and still come up with a universe that 'worked' in any sense. Maybe this is actually the best he could do.

This makes a lot more sense than the idea of a 'perfect' God creating an imperfect universe. You then have to blame someone or something else for the bad bits, and you're left with the basic problem of where that something came from.


_________________
"Grunge? Isn't that some gross shade of greenish orange?"


Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 98
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

09 Oct 2008, 1:47 pm

I find that leaving God out of it altogether makes more sense than anything else.



twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

09 Oct 2008, 10:28 pm

This reminds me of a joke.

Plato and a Platypus Walk into a Bar... wrote:
Three engineering students are discussing what sort of God must have designed the human body. The first says, "God must have been a mechanical engineer. Look at all the joints."

The second says, "I think God must have been an electrical engineer. The nervous system has thousands of electrical connections."

The third says, "Actually, God is a civil engineer. Who else would run a toxic waste pipeline through a recreational area?"

I highly recommend this book.
carturo222 wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
What kind of Designer would account for the astrophysics of this certain planet?


No designer needed for explaining that. In such a huge universe, small pockets of order are expected to arise.

Well, there is the supposed fine tuning problem.

Quote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
What kind of Designer would be able to create mass and energy from His own power?


This begs the question of whence your purported designer came from.

No. It really doesn't. I just got through dealing with the argument from causality in the religion bashing thread. Please refer to that.


_________________
* here for the nachos.


LostInEmulation
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,047
Location: Ireland, dreaming of Germany

10 Oct 2008, 7:49 am

oscuria wrote:
Tolerance, people! You guys scream more against religion than Limbaugh does against idiots like yourself.

Makes me cry. :cry:

You need to remember that many atheists here can only speak their mind in forums like this. Thus they do take the opportunity. I guess if people lived only with moderate religion, their comments would be much milder.

(Also remember that we Aspies have no tact anyways :P )


_________________
I am not a native speaker. Please contact me if I made grammatical mistakes in the posting above.

Penguins cannot fly because what cannot fly cannot crash!