test
Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] 

20 Dec 2008, 2:04 am

I am watching the news and they just mentioned "shy eating." Another eating disorder. It's when someone is so self conscious about their weight, they fear people will be grossed out to see them eat.

Last year, I heard of another eating disorder, pregnorexia :lol: . It's when a pregnant woman refuses to eat enough food because they don't want to gain a lot of weight.



I find it amusing how doctors keep coming up with conditions for behavior. What's next? Misconceptions disorder? :lol: Maybe doctors ought to come up with a name for pure ignorance. What shall we call it?



LabPet
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,744
Location: Canada

20 Dec 2008, 3:04 am

Yeah! I am curious as to what the brand-new oh-so-special DSM V will include.....hmm.

My contribution: By virtue of the DSM IV TR vested in me, I Dx the following next NT is "Nuts, NOS." Code # 329.00

*Disclaimer: I just made up that Code #. If it in fact coincides to a 'real' DSM IV TR existing Code #, or those afflicted with said condition or heck-ish awful disorder or mal-adjustment, Lab Pet apologies. Or you can merely sue Wrong Planet in leiu on account of WP in fact indulges me when I show-off in this manner.

Shy Eating? Egads.

There was even some mental condition termed (don't know the exact wording), "Post-OJ Simpson Syndrome" for those news watchers who had withdrawl symptoms from the 'exciting' world of OJ Simpson's ridiculousness! I don't know what DSM IV TR Code # that one is though.


_________________
The ones who say “You can’t” and “You won’t” are probably the ones scared that you will. - Unknown


Jenk
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2008
Age:27
Posts: 388

20 Dec 2008, 2:12 pm

The Human condition = The DSM-IV.



LabPet
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,744
Location: Canada

20 Dec 2008, 3:50 pm

Jenk wrote:
The Human condition = The DSM-IV.


Yes, and now it's to be revised. Meet DSM V....as if it weren't confusing enough; no one even understands the previous version(s) yet.

And why revise, in philosophical terms? This implies the first four versions just didn't work out - why is that? The human mind, or human condition, really has not evolved, in any respect, since DSM I was introduced! Or I guess 'they' likely had 'DSM' since the 'I' would mean there would be a sequel. IT'S LIKE A BAD ROCKY MOVIE!! !!

Just like the household cleaning product Formula 409. The first 408 versions just didn't work out. Is it so hard to make a surfactant?
Likewise.


_________________
The ones who say “You can’t” and “You won’t” are probably the ones scared that you will. - Unknown


Jenk
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2008
Age:27
Posts: 388

20 Dec 2008, 8:29 pm

:D It is clearly an excruciating process, boxing the masses.



Teddy
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2008
Age:26
Posts: 50
Location: Way too close to Antarctica

23 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm

Remember that news =/= doctors. This "shy eating" would probably be considered a diagnostic criteria for anorexia or ED-NOS. Not an illness on its own.

Im glad they revise the DSM. After all, homosexuality used to be considered an illness in the DSM. It's not anymore.


_________________
Im just sipping gin and tonic
In the smallest bar in the universe
Maybe.