I don't lend the idea of gender much credence to myself, subjectively. I feel as if the whole idea of what men and women "are", determined culturally, are more or less illegitimate extrapolations from legitimate psychological and even sexual differences (For example, women are by and large physically weaker. That's a sexual fact, because their inferior strength are not culturally derived, unverifiable, unfalsifiable "Facts" pertaining to the ultimate nature of the sexes. Therefore, the men, by and large, extend this to it's "Logical" end, designating themselves as the provider for their families, never once considering variables such as the possibility of the womens' superior or equal psychological strength and drive to serve that same role, which may inspire her to, given the chance, excel at certain tasks, despite being less strong physically.) which are wholly unnecessary. I'm comfortable with my sex, but what I am characteristically is what I am as an individual human being, not as a member of either supposed gender. It's much simpler and sensible to label myself in that respect than it is to lay out my individual characteristics and say I'm more "Masculine" or "Feminine". I suppose I could say I'm androgynous, but that'd be saying I'm unidentifiable as either a member of the male gender or the female one and again, those for me are unnecessary assumptions which I don't feel I need to assume the existence of (Unlike murder being wrong). Therefore, why should I, again?
Also, I'm straight. One unorthodox thing you could say about my views on sexual relationships is that I believe in Polyamory/Open relationships from a philosophical standpoint. That doesn't mean I'll necessary enter one; just that I am certainly open to the concept of entering one or having a partner in one, so long as there is mutual consent on both ends to do so. As long as everybody's honest and responsible adults and nobody's sneaking behind anybody's back, I fail to see the "Immorality" inherent in such an arrangement.