I have Aspergers and my gift is that I write religion....

Transcention · Raven Joined: Aug 21, 2008 Posts: 124

Don't get me wrong I'm quite comfortable for someone who can barely organize their life enough to make it through the day without my family and my wife organizing every aspect of my Existence. I'm not complaining. If I wasn't married to a highly organized woman I, no doubt, would still be living off the credit cards provided by my family. All my bills would still be being sent to my families business address so I never even have to look at them and I would still be listening to music and pacing around my old home, that was covered from ceiling to floor, on every wall, with passages of my writing.

I would probably be going to a lot more interesting parties than I am going to right now as well, if I didn't find a wonderful woman and get married. And I would most likely be getting into a lot more trouble than I am now as well. Twisted Evil

But, hey that is a small sacrifice for a stable and peaceful home.

I hope at least my writing helps at least one person on this forum, feel better about their life. This work is a constant source of inspiration to me and is what keeps me alive, week to week.

I'm a complete science fiction addict and I know exactly why I love it. I love science fiction because I can see all the probabilities consequently inherent in the entire Universe and therefore, consequently, the entire of Existence. I can see all the probabilties inherent in Existence, more precisely, all that is known and is unknown about Existence. Science fiction is like plucking one strand of probabilites out of the infinite number of possibilites inherent in Existence and creating a story about it. It maybe only one strand from an infinite number of possibilities but that one strand is enough to transport me to a world in which I can have my Aspergers Syndrome, healed and corrected through science. I can read about brains augmented far beyond the capability of what human beings are presently capable of. I can read about bodies that are cybernetically augmented, far beyond anything capable in the current point in spacetime, human beings find themselves in. Science fiction places my imagination somewhere where the crushing disability of my cognitive/neurological disorder doesn't cripple me to the point of agony, every single day. I love science fiction. Seriously, I thank whatever powers that govern Existence, every single day for the joy a simple work of good science fiction brings to my Life, every now and then. Funnily enough though, I'm a writer and I could never bloody actually write science fiction. I simply couldn't do fiction, my imagination is completely bound to non-fiction.

Here's a sample of my work. If you all play nice with me I have a lot more of my work that might interest you. I can barely handle day to day life and can't see myself getting published, which is why I'm giving it to you all for free, but my doctor and my wife are trying to get me to that point.

Consider the fact that I have been totally fixated on this 42 pages of work that I am writing and have been editing it a few times a week for over a year now. Consider that I have been thinking about religion and everything about religion for as long as I can remember, that being well over 15 years now. I have always thought about religion even when I was a child. But it is only now as an adult that I am actually gaining some proficiency in the subject.

My writing doesn't really make total sense, unless one examines it in it's entirety, and examines it as a whole, but I'll give you a sample for your enjoyment anyways.

This is passage number five. I might throw in a couple of random other passages, if anything in particular catches my eye. If your unfamilier with the writing style, it is in a Nietchian style of writing, as a numbered passage, without paragraphs. That's not to say I wouldn't change the whole thing based on the opinion of anyone reading it. I'm strangely flexible depending on whoever reads my work and communicates constructively to me about it.

5

Universalistic Perspectivism, is thus: One has to understand that the Earth revolves around the sun, which is a star, and that the sun, as a star, is one star, of tens of, or possibly even hundreds of billions of stars, that forms something, called on Earth, a galaxy, and that a galaxy is part of a cluster of tens, maybe even hundreds, of billions of galaxies that stretch as far as human technology allows us to see, and that all the galaxies in their entirety form something human beings, call the Universe. One also has to understand that the Universe is very old, it's exact age is a mystery, but the approximate age is most likely over five billion years old. The Universe could in fact, be anything from around five billion, to around fifteen billion years old, however, there are also streams of thought that could place the Universe's age in terms of hundreds of billions of years old, and beyond, really, there is no known limit for how old the Universe could be.

One of the probabilities in relation to the evolution of the Universe, is that the Universe is like a tube. It is possible that the Universe actually has no theoretical end, energy and matter may enter the Universe at one end of a great tube, evolve into what we know as our galaxy, and may exist for billions of years; that matter may exist and evolve, until it reaches the end of the tube evolving into quasars and God only knows what, and then through some process human beings don't really understand, that matter and energy may be reinserted at the beginning of the tube again. And the whole process begins anew. The process of how the Universe comes into being may be essentially eternal. Human beings are simply at a point in spacetime that such a theory is unprovable, given our level of technology and science. Alternatively, the Universe may originate at a single point in spacetime, as the theory of the Big Band suggests and then evolves into the Universe we know it now, and expands until all the matter and energy in the Universe reaches a point at which it again begins to implode back onto itself, until it reaches the original point at which the Big Bang originated. Any age given, in relation to how old the Universe is, is nothing but theory and is hypothetical. However, five billion years to around fifteen billion years old is a decent lower limit for how old the Universe might be.

Now, armed with these two simple concepts of space and time, in relation to the size and age of the Universe; to understand Universalistic Perspectivism, one must be able to see oneself, in relation to the whole known Universe that human beings know of, and in relation to the billions of years the Universe has been in Existence for. The principle of Universalistic Perspectivism, is that over the entire course of a human life, if one subconsciously, or even quite consciously meditates upon this concept of Universalistic Perspectivism, the idea, is that this leads to a true degree of enlightenment about the entire nature of reality. The idea, is that Universalistic Perspectivism allows the human mind to better reflect upon and understand the reality of the Existence we live in. While the level of enlightenment that Universalistic Perspectivism gives a human being doesn't solve any of the truly great mysteries of Existence; or allow one to astrally project one's mind; or allow one to see the future; or teleport oneself around at will; or magically heal the sick; or any other insane claim human beings make about what enlightenment is; Universalistic Perspectivism certainly gives one an edge over a human being who doesn't understand Universalistic Perspectivism. Just for example, Universalistic Perspectivism, over time, changes you, it allows you to take everything one currently knows about one's current point in spacetime and it allows one to make, admittedly, inaccurate projections about all the possibilities inherent in Existence. As a more clear example, Universalistic Perpectivism allows one to take everything one knows about science and see what science will be capable of over the next million years or so. Universalistic Perspectivism doesn't allow one to see in any true detail what human science will be like in a million, or a billion years. But it does allow a person to see, however vaguely, how much control over matter, space and time and their own biological evolution human beings will gain over the reality in which they exist.

That particular rollercoaster ride of the mind alone, is worth the price of admission by learning what Universalistic Perspectivism is, within the context of the religion of Universalism. Universalistic Perspectivism in turn allows one to better understand the entirety of Existence as it relates to human beings, at whatever point of spacetime they exist in, therefore making one truly enlightened, at least to a very tiny, if significant, fraction of a degree. One has to understand Universalistic Perspectivism to understand anything I write, one has to understand Universalistic Perspectivism to be a Universalist. The very name of the religion, Universalism, that I have created, was originally derived from the principle of Universalistic Perspectivism.

Universalism as a religion began with Universalistic Perspectivism. It was the first thing I wrote about in the first page of my notebooks back when I actually used a pen, truly crazy times that they were. I don't know why I thought of Universalistic Perspectivism in the first place, it's just a particular quirk of the day to day religious experience I'm having that will most likely continue till I take my last breath on Earth, or preferably till I take my last freaken breath out amongst the stars where I truly want to be. I must admit though, Earth has a certain quant charm to it, but I'd prefer my last breath to be as absolutely far away from Earth as it's humanly possible to reach in my lifetime, but I'm guessing that's unlikely.

It took quite a number of years for Universalistic Perspectivism to sink into my mind and truly convert me into a Universalist. It took many years for Universalistic Perspectivism to enlighten my mind. However that’s the absolute power Universalism has to convert you. Universalism converts you by sheer force of fact and through sheer force of truth. One isn't converted into a Universalist by my charisma, or personal magnetism, that much is certain because I have little to no charisma or personal magnetism, most of the time. Universalism converts you through the sheer weight of it's almost, absolute, true reflection of the reality in which humans live. I know that is what has partially converted my wife to Universalism. She wasn't converted by my charisma, she was converted into a Universalist because the philosophy is so right, the philosophy is such a true reflection of the reality of human existence that it was impossible for her not to be, currently, at least partially, converted to it's most infinitely sublime ways. It's what converted me as well. My conversion to Universalism is, of course, absolute. I cannot be anything else in the Universe knowing what I know. I can only be a Universalist. Universalism has completely converted me to it's influence. I am absolutely powerless to resist the influence it has over me. And I am thankful that God, or whatever forces that be, have empowered my mind with Universalism.

I beg and plead with whatever powers that be, that whatever happens in my Existence throughout all of eternity, please if I can only ask for, and pray for, one thing in the entire of Existence, please do not take Universalism away from my mind. Take everything you need from me, throughout all of eternity, but please, God, the only thing I truly beg of you, please, never take Universalism away from my mind. It is the most beautiful and sublime thing I have ever seen through my mind.

6

Here is the essential and simplified equation, one of the true keys to enlightenment. This following passage is one of the most basic and fundamental philosophies of Universalism. This passage is the very foundation upon which Universalism is built. If it's an almost certain, inevitability, that human beings will continue to create religions, no matter how good or bad, and if every aspect of religion can be rendered in anyway possibly conceivable, by the human imagination onto the surface of the Universe, then the ultimate question remains. How should religion be done? A simple enough premise, yes? Yet this premise is infinitely complex in practice. The resulting philosophy from the proper practice of this premise as religion, is rocket science. The proper practice of this premise as religion is one of the most difficult things in the Universe to do. I could go so far as to say that the human brain isn't even fully capable yet of the proper practice of this premise as religion. The human brain however, is capable of "beginning" to properly practice this premise as true religion, worthy of Existence. Human beings, such as myself, can begin to lay down the first true "SOLID" foundations of the philosophy of a religion worthy of the gift of Existence... The human brain is capable of achieving that much at least, at this point in history. In Universalist philosophy there was a point in time, a specific point in time, that the human brain became ready to create religion. It was around the 1920's, when humanity first discovered galaxies and the full extent of their place in the universe. It was only as far back in human history as 1920, during "The Great Debate" that humans fully realized how large the Universe is, and how the whole Universe fit together, from our planet, to the sun, to the stars surrounding us, and how those stars fit together to form a galaxy and how, human beings are surrounded by hundreds of billions of galaxies that make up the entirety of the known Universe. It was only truly then that all the possibilities inherent in the Universe became apparent to the human mind and imagination. That was when the human brain became ready to create religion, in Universalism. That's part of the philosophy of Universalism, as it is written by me. I guess the first celebrational holiday of Universalism needs to be celebrated on the day of the year "The Great Debate" happened. That was the day it became possible for any human mind to create religion of the likes of Universalism, should they so choose to. Writing religion takes a certain amount of precision in how one structures the philosophy, one creates. To write religion of any quality, one needs to know a great deal of information about the Universe. However, it is not the amount of information alone, that one needs to write religion of quality. One needs to understand the information about the Universe one has collected in the right kind of a way. The right kind of information, one needs, to write religion didn't exist before the 20th century. And without the right kind of information, it only follows that it was impossible to understand the information one needs, to create quality religion. Basically all religion before the 20th century is pretty much almost completely worthless, aside from some basic salvage value. It has only truly become possible within the last few decades to truly begin to write religion of any value. That is quite a revelation in itself, if one understands enough of the philosophy of the religion of Universalism to comprehend what I am trying to get across in this particular passage. Writing religion comes down to two basic things. The religion one writes is how the author makes it, with their free will and the religion one writes is what the Universe, or in a sense what God makes of it. Now one of these things, the free will of a human being, is quantifiable however the influence that the Universe, or God, has on the religion one writes is not quantifiable. This is a very simple premise in principle but infinitely more complex in practice.

7

To understand enlightenment, one must first start with a reference point of some kind. A concept is a very strange thing, it is fluid, and two people can have a radically different understanding of the same concept; without a reference point, a concept is meaningless between two people; unless one creates a mutual understanding between those two people. So let us start with the highest form of enlightenment; to have total enlightenment, one must know every single thing about Existence. One must know how Existence came into being. One must know the entire history of Existence, and every single thing about Existence. Such may be the extent and age of Existence, that it may be impossible to know everything about it. One must start with the highest level of enlightenment and work our way down to the level attainable by human beings, to understand enlightenment. To be fully enlightened, one must know everything, about everything. One must completely understand every facet of Existence; how Existence came into being and every single thing that relates to everything in Existence. I know I'm repeating myself, but something as completely mind blowing, as defining what total, complete and absolute enlightenment would mean, is worth repeating certain things, a couple of times, at the very least. It is quite possible that even the forces which govern Existence, or, if you will indulge me, God, doesn't know every single thing about Existence. Existence may be so ancient and so complex, as to be beyond any human, or even divine, conception of time, space, matter, or mind. Existence may be so ancient, that much of the history of Existence, to all beings that know of Existence, as we know it, may be lost. What I am trying to say, of course, is that complete, absolute, and total enlightenment is no light matter, if you shalt once again indulge me. Full, absolute, and total, enlightenment, is well beyond the ability of a human being to understand, or attain. At least, as far as I, the author of these words, can tell. To understand enlightenment one must first appreciate the most extreme level of enlightenment that is, with the human mind, conceivably attainable; and that is our reference point. A human being can only attain a minuscule fraction, of a single degree, of enlightenment. Anything below full enlightenment is only a degree of enlightenment. Whether you have 20 degrees of enlightenment, or 359 degrees of enlightenment, as God may have, then that is still only a degree of enlightenment, compared to full enlightenment, a state of being that may simply be impossible, no matter what level of Existence one lives at. However, a degree of enlightenment is all one needs. Even in relation to the human condition, where only a fraction of a single degree of enlightenment is possible, a mere billionth? a trillionth? of a single degree of enlightenment on this scale leading up to full enlightenment; that billionth of a degree is still something worth striving for. Full, absolute and total enlightenment is our reference point. And that is what brings us around to the point in hand. A human can only attain a degree of enlightenment about Existence. Yet, that tiny fraction, of a degree of enlightenment, one can attain, is worth living for, fighting for, and it is worth dying for.

56

L.Ron.Hubbard is the perfect example of how to successfully create a religion. He is also the perfect example of how to write the philosophy of a religion that is as absolutely and completely insane as it is possible to write. I mean what a f***ing douchebag. I write religion, seriously he was a total and complete brilliant lunatic. I mean, come on, Scientology is stupid. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to work that out. It boggles the mind how so many successful and seemingly intelligent people can believe in such a foul and corrupt philosophy of a religion. For every talented and successful person who joins Scientology it is a victory for evil and chaos in the Universe and is a devastating blow to causality and for the future of humanity. I cannot truly ever, express the full extent of my perplexity, horror and disgust at the fact that people, can be fooled by the most hideously grotesque philosophy that L.Ron.Hubbard wrote and managed to successfully create into a fully functioning religion. If God truly is a joker then the joke is most certainly on the Scientologists. For any person of reason and of common sense is not laughing along with Scientologists, any true person of reason and common sense can only laugh at them until they simply explode from the madness that is Scientology.