Page 2 of 2 [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

andy1976uk
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Dec 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,122

21 Jan 2007, 9:51 pm

Unknown wrote:
andy1976uk wrote:
Unknown wrote:
MrMark wrote:
Unknown wrote:
Those are UBER old-school (except for far cry)

Quake 4
Deus Ex: Invisible War
Doom 3


Oh.

Crysis has great grafx and hopefully great gameplay.

Might get flight sim x,though it'll be a lag fest with even a 8600U or 8800GTS 320,unless dx 10 fixes it.



Yup, although if you're willing to make big compromises on the detail settings you can run FSX even on my rig at about 10 - 15 FPS. It still looks good, but nowhere near it's full potential. Would love to see FSX running in all it's glory at 60 FPS (Excuse me a minute while I borrow IBM's Bluegene Supercomputer). :D


Supercomputers aren't meant for gaming,so you'll get 15 FPS at best.


They should make them. I want my million-core game console.



RTSgamerFTW
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,410

21 Jan 2007, 10:07 pm

andy1976uk wrote:
Unknown wrote:
andy1976uk wrote:
Unknown wrote:
MrMark wrote:
Unknown wrote:
Those are UBER old-school (except for far cry)

Quake 4
Deus Ex: Invisible War
Doom 3


Oh.

Crysis has great grafx and hopefully great gameplay.

Might get flight sim x,though it'll be a lag fest with even a 8600U or 8800GTS 320,unless dx 10 fixes it.



Yup, although if you're willing to make big compromises on the detail settings you can run FSX even on my rig at about 10 - 15 FPS. It still looks good, but nowhere near it's full potential. Would love to see FSX running in all it's glory at 60 FPS (Excuse me a minute while I borrow IBM's Bluegene Supercomputer). :D


Supercomputers aren't meant for gaming,so you'll get 15 FPS at best.


They should make them. I want my million-core game console.


Only your great-great-great grandkids will see a 1,024,000-core console.


_________________
My sig pwns.


andy1976uk
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Dec 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,122

21 Jan 2007, 10:11 pm

It's likely we'll have 1000 core processors within 10 years, and that's pretty much a 250-fold increase over today's number, so at that rate we could see them in less than 30 years. 8O
How long the software takes to exploit that power is another matter entirely....



ahayes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Dec 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,506

22 Jan 2007, 12:11 am

I think we'll eventually figure out optical computing and be able to run them in the multiple hundred terahertz range.



andy1976uk
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Dec 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,122

22 Jan 2007, 12:17 am

ahayes wrote:
I think we'll eventually figure out optical computing and be able to run them in the multiple hundred terahertz range.


I like the idea of being able to build circuitry in 3 dimensions perhaps using carbon nanotubes, instead of the way photolithography currently limits us to just the 2 dimensions. With optical computing, quantum computing, nanotube-based solutions, DNA-computing; Moore's Law probably won't hit a brick wall for a very long time. Next several decades should prove to be very interesting indeed.



ahayes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Dec 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,506

22 Jan 2007, 12:22 am

andy1976uk wrote:
ahayes wrote:
I think we'll eventually figure out optical computing and be able to run them in the multiple hundred terahertz range.


I like the idea of being able to build circuitry in 3 dimensions perhaps using carbon nanotubes, instead of the way photolithography currently limits us to just the 2 dimensions. With optical computing, quantum computing, nanotube-based solutions, DNA-computing; Moore's Law probably won't hit a brick wall for a very long time. Next several decades should prove to be very interesting indeed.
The problem with digital computers now is propagation delay.



Quest_techie
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 380

22 Jan 2007, 6:56 am

I actually kind of want hardware homeostasis for home systems, not at this point, and not for a good deal of time <I want photo realistic graphics rendered in real time before that point> mostly because it would drive down the cost of in home systems, but also because the gaming industry could then reach some standards for compatibility which would allow a much higher quality of product and a much greater quantity also



ahayes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Dec 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,506

22 Jan 2007, 1:01 pm

We probably could get to photo realistic graphics in games if we focused on doing better job on the software side of things rather than relying on more advanced hardware.



Jeckel
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 30

30 Jan 2007, 5:53 pm

I love Civ4, its modablitity is just staggering and the use of python is great. :)

Right now I'm playing Neverwinter Nights I and II with some buddies on the lan I have set up.


I think the future of computing is going to be in light sensitve magnetic plastics. One kind of light makes them more magnetic and anther color makes them less magnetic. But whatever the method used, it is for sure that they will get a lot faster and smaller.


_________________
For Evil to succeed, Good Men need only do nothing.


ScratchMonkey
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 232

31 Jan 2007, 8:56 am

My 6-year-old team:

http://matureasskickers.net/

We started in Tribes 2, moved to Battlefield 1942, then 2, now 2142. We have a Guild Wars and WoW group (I mostly play WoW now). We're looking forward to Quake Wars and Team Fortress 2 later this year. We have little pockets of interest in other games. We have over 100 members.

One of the fabless chip places just came out with a new technology for stacking circuitry on the chip, which should increase density.

A bigger problem is heat. As you pack stuff tighter, the heat density goes up. Voltages are getting lower, which somewhat mitigates that.

Another problem is quantum effects. As things get tinier, uncertainty and randomness increases, and those are the enemy of deterministic (repeatable) logic.



sparkman
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 16 May 2005
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 202
Location: N Ireland

01 Feb 2007, 6:59 am

I play or have played

Operation Flashpoint
Operation Flashpoint Resistance
Armed assault

GTR
GTL
GPL
F1 Challenge

HL2
Farcry



TennisFanatic
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 426

02 Feb 2007, 10:35 pm

PC GAMING FTW!! !!

I first played Doom back in the early 1990's...teh "oldsk00l" DOS version!



ghostgurl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Nov 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,328
Location: Orange County, CA

03 Feb 2007, 3:30 am

I play adventure games mostly, but on occasion I play Sim games and RTS games.


_________________
Currently Reading: Survival by Juliet E. Czerneda
http://dazed-girl.livejournal.com/
Vote Kalister 2008


jimservo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,964
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs

03 Feb 2007, 11:21 am

I have been into PC gaming for maybe a dozen years. Every once in a while I will try a console but I have never been able to get into it that much. To be honest, I am not as much into it as I used to. Often I will buy games I never finish them. It's more a distraction then anything else now.

Games presently playing:

Out of the Park 2006
Heart of Iron Doomsday
Company of Heroes
Battlefield 1942+the expansions
Battlefield Vietnam
President Forever + Primaries
Basic Little Windows Games (Like Spider Solitaire and Jezzball)



Space
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,082

03 Feb 2007, 2:57 pm

PC games are great, it's just such an expensive hobby. If you want to play the latest games you have to upgrade every year or two.