Page 3 of 3 [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

08 Jan 2009, 11:57 pm

Are they still considered a promising research area, or is it felt that fusion has hit a brick wall?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

09 Jan 2009, 5:59 am

LKL wrote:
Are they still considered a promising research area, or is it felt that fusion has hit a brick wall?


It is like searching for the Fountain of Eternal Youth. The prospect is so attractive people will not give up, regardless of the difficulty. And we do know fusion is possible. That is what makes sunshine.

ruveyn



twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

09 Jan 2009, 4:33 pm

LKL wrote:
Are they still considered a promising research area, or is it felt that fusion has hit a brick wall?

Apparently yes, which is why possible designs for fusion reactors is an active research area, and there are a few in the works which seem to be inching closer to viability. Still, I don't think there's too much optimism that fusion is going to fix our energy problems any time soon, e.g. "I think it will be 100 years before we have commercially viable energy." here


_________________
* here for the nachos.


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

10 Jan 2009, 12:25 pm

twoshots wrote:
LKL wrote:
Are they still considered a promising research area, or is it felt that fusion has hit a brick wall?

Apparently yes, which is why possible designs for fusion reactors is an active research area, and there are a few in the works which seem to be inching closer to viability. Still, I don't think there's too much optimism that fusion is going to fix our energy problems any time soon, e.g. "I think it will be 100 years before we have commercially viable energy." here


A hundred years from now controlled nuclear fusion will still be thirty years in the future as it has been for the last 60 years

ruveyn



Woodpecker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2008
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,625
Location: Europe

10 Jan 2009, 1:02 pm

Why not just stick with fission, it is so much more easy to build a fission reactor.

If one has a supply of fissile matter then lots of simple and safe designs exist such as CANDU, BWR and some others.


_________________
Health is a state of physical, mental and social wellbeing and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity :alien: I am not a jigsaw, I am a free man !

Diagnosed under the DSM5 rules with autism spectrum disorder, under DSM4 psychologist said would have been AS (299.80) but I suspect that I am somewhere between 299.80 and 299.00 (Autism) under DSM4.