Page 1 of 1 [ 8 posts ] 

NateRiver
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 8 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 238

02 Dec 2012, 3:33 pm

A field is 50m in width and 110 m in length.

The width is given correct to the nearest 5 m.
The length is given correct to the nearest 10 m.

Find the maximum area of the field


AND


Pond A has a surface area of 150m^2 to an accuracy of 2 significant figures.
Pond B has a surface area of 90m^2 to an accuracy of 2 significant figures.
What is the lower bound of the difference between the surface areas of Pond A and B


Answers to the first and last one are,


6037.5 and 54.5



Trencher93
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 23 Jun 2008
Age: 124
Gender: Male
Posts: 464

02 Dec 2012, 3:52 pm

Looks like standard calculus max/min stuff to me.

http://www.math.uga.edu/~gootman/book.html

Barron's Calculus book is one of the best I've ever seen. There are a billion calculus books, since college students take it and want extra help, but Grootman's book is the best I've ever encountered. It doesn't have the breadth of a full textbook, but it covers the stuff you have to know to master everything else in good depth with clear explanations.



starkid
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,812
Location: California Bay Area

02 Dec 2012, 5:56 pm

Which course is this for?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

02 Dec 2012, 6:16 pm

NateRiver wrote:
A field is 50m in width and 110 m in length.

The width is given correct to the nearest 5 m.
The length is given correct to the nearest 10 m.

Find the maximum area of the field


AND


Pond A has a surface area of 150m^2 to an accuracy of 2 significant figures.
Pond B has a surface area of 90m^2 to an accuracy of 2 significant figures.
What is the lower bound of the difference between the surface areas of Pond A and B


Answers to the first and last one are,


6037.5 and 54.5


the first answer can't be right. Since the number are correct to the nearest 5 meter the dimensions can be as large as 55 x 115 which is large than the answer given.

ruveyn



eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

02 Dec 2012, 6:30 pm

ruveyn wrote:
NateRiver wrote:
A field is 50m in width and 110 m in length.

The width is given correct to the nearest 5 m.
The length is given correct to the nearest 10 m.

Find the maximum area of the field


AND


Pond A has a surface area of 150m^2 to an accuracy of 2 significant figures.
Pond B has a surface area of 90m^2 to an accuracy of 2 significant figures.
What is the lower bound of the difference between the surface areas of Pond A and B


Answers to the first and last one are,


6037.5 and 54.5


the first answer can't be right. Since the number are correct to the nearest 5 meter the dimensions can be as large as 55 x 115 which is large than the answer given.

ruveyn


Actually, if the field was 55x115, then it wouldn't be 50x110 to the nearest 5 m in width and 10 m in length.

To the nearest 5 m in width, it could be as large as 52.5 m. To the nearest 10 m in length, it could be 115 m long. Therefore the area is 52.5*115 or 6037.5 square meters.



rixxar12
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 125

02 Dec 2012, 6:35 pm

NateRiver wrote:
A field is 50m in width and 110 m in length.

The width is given correct to the nearest 5 m.
The length is given correct to the nearest 10 m.

Find the maximum area of the field


AND


Pond A has a surface area of 150m^2 to an accuracy of 2 significant figures.
Pond B has a surface area of 90m^2 to an accuracy of 2 significant figures.
What is the lower bound of the difference between the surface areas of Pond A and B


Answers to the first and last one are,


6037.5 and 54.5


The firts one

I think i has to do with measures lets see.

If our length has to go maximum.
And our width to.

We got


The width is given correct to the nearest 5 m.
The length is given correct to the nearest 10 m.

We took this as boundaries.

So we have.

50-2.5<length<50+2.5
110-5<width<110+5

Then you will have

47.5<length<52.5
105<width<115

The maxima are 52.5 and 115
And the area of a rectangle is xy=A

A=(52.5)(115)
A=6037.5



M
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 7 Apr 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 41
Location: London, UK

06 Dec 2012, 8:40 pm

If the field was 52.5m wide then it would be rounded up to 55m as the nearest 5m. So the widest the field could be for 50m to be the nearest 5m is 52.4(9)m long. Similarly the longest it could be is 114.(9)m long.

Of course with rounding 52.4(9) x 114.(9) is 6037.4(9)8 which does round up to 6037.5, but to be technically accurate it really would have to be the smallest possible value under that size.

The brackets, incidentally, are one of the ways to representing repeating sets in a decimal number.

The second question simply wants to know the smallest (lower bound) possible difference in size between the ponds based on their range of possible sizes based on those given having been rounded off to two significant figures.

Significant figures are those leftmost in a number, but only counting zeros if they occur between other figures, which can include decimals. The easiest way of working with them is to move the decimal point to after the required number of digits, round the number off, then move the decimal back.

With the larger pond given as 150m^2, by placing the decimal after two digits you get 15.0, reducing it by a factor of ten.

The range of values that round to 15.0 are 14.5 and 15.4(9), so by multiply those back by a factor of ten the pond could be between 145m^2 and 154.(9)m^2 in size.

As the size of 90m^2 for smaller pond has only two digits there is no need to move the decimal. As the range of numbers that round to 90 is from 89.5 to 90.4(9) then the pond must be between 89.5m^2 and 90.4(9)m^2.

So to find the the smallest difference in size you need to assume the smaller pond is as large as it can be, and the larger pond is as small as it can be.

145 - 90.4(9) = 54.5(0)1

So after rounding off the messy recurring decimal, this is how you get an answer of 54.5.



eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

06 Dec 2012, 8:47 pm

M wrote:
If the field was 52.5m wide then it would be rounded up to 55m as the nearest 5m. So the widest the field could be for 50m to be the nearest 5m is 52.4(9)m long. Similarly the longest it could be is 114.(9)m long.


Yes and no. You could look at the width, W, and the length, L in terms of limits as W -> 52.5 and L -> 115 meters from the lower side. Then, the area, A = L * W will approach 6037.5 square meters. As long as W and L are close to, but less than, 52.5 and 115.5 meters, respectively, they will be rounded down no matter how close they are to 52.5 and 115.5 meters.