The "retro 80's" is naturally nothing like the real 80's. The real 80's sucked, more or less.
I sincerely hope the person who said he missed Reagan was joking. But in case he wasn't:
Thanks to the Reagan admin, thousands of American citizens suffering with AIDS were ignored while the governement, civic leaders and the medical community were dangerously slow to even so much as acknowledge that AIDS was a national problem and not just a problem among those "fa***ts." So thanks to Reagan's "if we just ignore it, maybe it'll go away" attitude, we had a decade of paranoia, bigotry, misinformation and non-action about AIDS.
The Reagan admin also created a widing prosperity gap between the middle class and the upper class by handing so much control to big business, which is still going on today. According to economists, a middle class family in America today should be making an household income of over $150,000. Yet despite all the spin by conservative pundits and journalists who paint a prettier ecomonic picture, most middle class families are lucky if they manage $90,000 (with two income earners in the household). Meanwhile, America has never had so many billionaires in its history. So if you're just starting out in life, and find it's damn hard to make a decent living even with a college education and a suppsedly good job, thank Reagan.
Another thing we have to thank Reagan for - the intel problems between the FBI and CIA that culminated in neither agency being well informed prior to 9/11. You have Bush Sr. to thank for that too. You see, Reagan's peak hypocrisy was that, during his great "War on Drugs" in the 80's, his admin with former CIA cheif Bush's urging allowed the CIA to wristslap the FBI from getting involved whenever CIA "assets" (foreign person that the CIA worked with) brought drugs like cocaine and heroin into the country. As result of all the free rein "dumping" of drugs unto our streets, we had a crack epidemic while urban gang violence came to an all time peak. The Reagan admin, and later Bush admin, treated the gang problem like it was some local issue completely unrelated to their own corrupt federal workings, and most Americans still think that today.
Here's the legacy of all that: the by teh end of teh 80's and throughout the 90's, the time when our "War on Drugs"-indoctrinated youth was coming of age, we saw the highest rate of illegal drugs use among this nation's youth in history, with heroin in particular. Makes sense - thanks to this "War on Drugs" these kids were very aware of drugs, and thanks to the CIA, drugs were readily available on our streets. So that was a complete failure, and if you, like me, lost people you cared about to cocaine, heroin or other drugs during the late 80's or 90's, be sure to thank Reagan for that.
Also the extremely poor relationship between the FBI and CIA left by Reagan and Bush Sr. continued despite what was done during Clinton's time, and so critical pre-9/11 intel never got shared and lot of critical intel was de-prioritized because it simply didn't get to the right people This intel "blind spot" enabled the next Bush admin to blithy ignore the warnings of the Clinton admin about the dangers of bin Laden's group on more or less political reasons. So when we ask why didn't we have a contigency plan in place for attacks on 9/11 like we did when Clinton was in office, thank not just W and the CIA, but also Reagan and Bush Sr.
Sorry, but while you may not like hardcore punk, at least those punkers didn't royally screw this country's citizenry over like Reagan did.
Besides, Flipper rules, OK?