PG-13 Movies That Should Have Been Rated R

Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 

AnonymousAnonymous
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 74,022
Location: Portland, Oregon

07 May 2014, 6:46 pm

What movies that were rated PG-13 do you think should have better off rated R?


_________________
Silly NTs, I have Aspergers, and having Aspergers is gr-r-reat!


lostonearth35
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jan 2010
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,363
Location: Lost on Earth, waddya think?

07 May 2014, 7:56 pm

I can think of one PG-13 movie that was *nearly* rated R: Gremlins. I read on TV Tropes they were originally going to have Billy's mother decapitated by one of the Gremlins after she puree'd one in a blender and blew up another in a microwave, and Billy was to come home to see his mom's head rolling down the stairs. 8O
But they wanted to keep the movie at a PG-13 rating so they left that part out, but it's why you don't see much of her until near the end of the movie. You got to admit though, she was one tough mom for directly killing those other vicious Gremlins! :)



Dantac
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,672
Location: Florida

07 May 2014, 8:09 pm

Star Wars Clone Wars tv series (and 'animated movie') clearly have R rated stuff.

The clones are shown getting murdered nonstop, some in rather horrific and imaginative ways... and also the droid army is routinely seen executing wounded/on the ground clones.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,155
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

07 May 2014, 9:11 pm

I don't really agree with movie ratings...it depends on the person what movies/shows people can handle. I have seen R rated movies that seem perfectly appropriate for younger audiences and I've seen PG-13 movies that would probably disturb some 13 year olds. Ratings tend to be rather inaccurate, for instance violence is ok for PG 13 but bad language automatically gets an R rating....so half they time I don't get how they decide on the standards by which to rate things.


_________________
Metal never dies. \m/


mr_bigmouth_502
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Dec 2013
Age: 31
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 7,028
Location: Alberta, Canada

07 May 2014, 11:02 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
I don't really agree with movie ratings...it depends on the person what movies/shows people can handle. I have seen R rated movies that seem perfectly appropriate for younger audiences and I've seen PG-13 movies that would probably disturb some 13 year olds. Ratings tend to be rather inaccurate, for instance violence is ok for PG 13 but bad language automatically gets an R rating....so half they time I don't get how they decide on the standards by which to rate things.


I agree. Film ratings are stupid, mainly because of how they influence the way movies are made. A lot of R-rated films have actually had to be toned down in content just to avoid getting NC-17, so that more theaters will show them. Likewise, a lot of films that would have originally gotten G or PG ratings have had extra "mature" content added conspicuously just to move them up into the next rating bracket, to encourage ticket sales. The one trend that annoys me the most however, is how a lot of action movies and such are being toned down in content to get into the PG-13 "sweet spot", as PG-13 is the highest unrestricted rating in the MPAA system.

I liked it better back when filmmakers weren't pressured to make their films conform to certain ratings to ensure sales.

Anyway, back to the original topic, one PG-13 film that surprised me was Salt. That movie was crazy violent even compared to a lot of R-rated films I've seen. 8O Awesome movie, but damn. Another was Goldeneye. Granted, Goldeneye was probably typical for PG-13 films in the mid-90s, but I think it would come close to getting an R-rating today, depending on who's day it is to determine the ratings. :P