What's with the political signatures people have?

Post Reply New Topic

I thought this was against forum rules?

Which one?

I also don't get them.

Oh, I see. My first reaction is that different political positions are not necessarily associated with conflict. I see it as a hobby. But some people do think that political positions are not suitable for display, so I need to reflect on my understanding.

the idea of "what is political" is probably pretty subjective. What might be a trigger for one person may be something many others don't even notice.

If we shut down/ shout down
all comments others disagreed with, nobody would be bold enough to make any personal statements at all. ( my opinion) interchange of ideas is better to be encouraged, I think.

Would love to know which signatures folks have that are so offensive? I can't say I've noticed any at all?

In all fairness there is one person who DOES have a signature that reads "No for supporting Trump".

Is THAT what you're referring to?

Not sayin I object to it, but that IS one example of somewhat partisan political signature ...that someone might be offended by.

But that one is the only example I can think of.

Politics? Is that the thing that they use to keep us all distracted and divided while they make work slaves out of us, rob us blind and ravage the earth for their own personal gain?

I've turned my signatures off

I did the search you (the OP) suggested and saw the signatures you are referring to and in my opinion neither one of them comes close to anything "that purposely causes conflict with other members." Personally, I completely agree with both of the signatures in question, even though they appear to come from opposing viewpoints, because both are making simple factual statements. And even if someone interprets these signatures otherwise, they would be hard-pressed to say they were purposely intending to cause conflict.

I am presuming you mean: