goldfish21 wrote:
Who_Am_I wrote:
Because really, who the f**k would want to work with someone who is miserable and causes bad spirit?
This.
Although, I can relate to the OP's question... a few years back when I was a miserable as*hole, I could still be a productive worker and it irritated me that social status and like-ability trumped productivity and the bottom line. I've since come to realize that no one likes to be around a miserable as*hole & that money isn't everything - even to a business. It's much better for an employer to have a happier employee that others like to be around (whether coworkers or clients) who produces a little less than it is to have a miserable SOB who works his ass off. Over the long run, but business will be more successful and profitable with the less productive happy employee vs. the highly effective and efficient guy that no one can stand so others quit or take their business elsewhere.
Yeah, that's one thing that my VP was very clear on when she was interviewing. The main thing she wanted was someone who would get along with the team.
Their last worker had been standoffish and unfriendly and it made people hesitate to talk over the cube walls like normal, and also meant more people spent time away from their desks, trying to stay away from the unpleasantness.
Luckily, I had a consultant friend working here who attested that I was pleasant to work with (though he's a programming and database nerd, so he's likely biased). But, the people I work with are funny, but, low key, so, I don't stand out too much. There were two hires made after me and they've fit in as well. It's been good, people communicate a lot and well, so that's good. (as I've mentioned, it's a bit much for me, I might have preferred it when folks were leery of speaking
)