Daniel89 wrote:
Why is targeting the wealthy any different?
You're missing my point. I'm saying that it
isn't any different.
We live in a society which is increasingly teaching men not to rape and teaching white people to check their privilege. Neither of those things are bad, but we also need to teach the rich to stop being greedy pigs.
"Liberals" nowadays are hypocrites who think that men need to be taught not to rape, but
don't think that the rich deserve any sort of moral lecture. That's why I'm a socialist. Socialism, unlike plain old liberalism, is consistent. It hasn't been bought out by fatcats.
Quote:
Targeting corruption and theft is different thing.
Well ... we might as well call ourselves anti-rich because rich people and their "conservative" muppets start bitching about communism whenever anti-corruption legislation is discussed.
People are going to call you a socialist if you want anti-corruption legislation. You might as well embrace it.
Quote:
How is it greedy for the rich to want to keep their money but not greedy for wanting to take it away from them?
If you take wealth from one person and give it to someone else who needs that wealth in order to avoid starvation, that is heroism, not greed.
Socialism was never about envy. It has always been about survival.
_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre
READ THIS ->
https://represent.us/