GAO: Voter ID laws suppress voting, not fraud

Page 9 of 11 [ 166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

18 Oct 2014, 4:20 am

Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Wat dat?


http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/ ... rty-scheme

Quote:
A former official in the Oakland County Democratic Party in Michigan was sentenced to one year probation for his part in a scheme last fall to split the Republican vote by putting fake Tea Party candidates on the ballot.

In October, former chairman of the Oakland County Democrats Michael McGuinness pleaded no contest to the charges, which involved perjury and forgery. He was sentenced Wednesday to "one-year probation, 180 hours of community service and $1,965 in fines," according to the Detroit News.

"My sentence will pale in comparison to what you have done to yourself," Oakland Circuit Judge James M. Alexander told McGuinness, adding: "You were on the fast track for political office. ... It was all there for you, and you threw it all away."

The ex-operations director for the Oakland Dems, Jason Bauer, also pleaded no contest to the charges, and will be sentenced January 12.

The charges relate to a scheme to put several candidates on the ballot in November 2010, without the candidates' knowledge. The sham candidates, who were listed as members of the Michigan Tea Party, were designed to split the Republican vote. The two Democrats were charged with forging the supposed candidates' signatures and falsely swearing under oath to qualify them to enter the race.


This was just the most prominent case, it's gone on quite a bit.


Of course that's indefensible. The difference is, I admit what those jerks did was bad; but how many conservatives concede that voter ID laws are meant to disenfranchise people?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

18 Oct 2014, 4:25 am

Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
And the only reason why minorities, the poor, and college students would start voting Republican is if that party actually represented their concerns. So far, that's unlikely, outside the odd Uncle Tom or Young Republican.


So you think minorities all should think and act a certain way because they're minorities? I think there's a word for that...


No, but I think there is something wrong with a person who votes against his or her own economic or social interests for the sake of ideology, fear, or whatever. I would say the exact same thing about those white blue collar workers who vote Republican out of fear of bogeymen like gay marriage, instead of paying attention to stagnant wages, slashed benefits, and outsourcing.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

18 Oct 2014, 4:34 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
No, but I think there is something wrong with a person who votes against his or her own economic or social interests for the sake of ideology, fear, or whatever. I would say the exact same thing about those white blue collar workers who vote Republican out of fear of bogeymen like gay marriage, instead of paying attention to stagnant wages, slashed benefits, and outsourcing.


Maybe other people have differing opinions on their own best interests, and perhaps they know them better than you do? Don't you think it's just a tad condescending to infantalize so many people as being unable to think for themselves, simply because they've come to different conclusions than you?


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

18 Oct 2014, 5:13 am

Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
No, but I think there is something wrong with a person who votes against his or her own economic or social interests for the sake of ideology, fear, or whatever. I would say the exact same thing about those white blue collar workers who vote Republican out of fear of bogeymen like gay marriage, instead of paying attention to stagnant wages, slashed benefits, and outsourcing.


Maybe other people have differing opinions on their own best interests, and perhaps they know them better than you do? Don't you think it's just a tad condescending to infantalize so many people as being unable to think for themselves, simply because they've come to different conclusions than you?


Sure, someone is entitled to believe banning gay marriage is more important than civil or labor rights, but it flies in the face of common sense. So if you think I'm being condescending, then fine, but putting "hot button" ideas ahead of one's legitimate self interest for the sake of fear or prejudice is nonsensical as far as I'm concerned.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

18 Oct 2014, 5:49 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
Sure, someone is entitled to believe banning gay marriage is more important than civil or labor rights, but it flies in the face of common sense. So if you think I'm being condescending, then fine, but putting "hot button" ideas ahead of one's legitimate self interest for the sake of fear or prejudice is nonsensical as far as I'm concerned.


You're still assuming that you know best and that everyone who thinks otherwise must be brainwashed or acting on some kind of religious nuttery, as opposed to having legitimately come to their beliefs. Take me, I support a lot of things that you'd think would be against my interests, but I've come to a different conclusion based on evidence and logic; do you really think you know my interests better than I do? Or, to put a finer point on it, do you think you're smarter and better informed than I am, and have a better grasp of what is and is not in my best interest?


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

18 Oct 2014, 6:10 am

Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Sure, someone is entitled to believe banning gay marriage is more important than civil or labor rights, but it flies in the face of common sense. So if you think I'm being condescending, then fine, but putting "hot button" ideas ahead of one's legitimate self interest for the sake of fear or prejudice is nonsensical as far as I'm concerned.


You're still assuming that you know best and that everyone who thinks otherwise must be brainwashed or acting on some kind of religious nuttery, as opposed to having legitimately come to their beliefs. Take me, I support a lot of things that you'd think would be against my interests, but I've come to a different conclusion based on evidence and logic; do you really think you know my interests better than I do? Or, to put a finer point on it, do you think you're smarter and better informed than I am, and have a better grasp of what is and is not in my best interest?


If we're talking about people who are swayed to vote against their own economic and social interests when the "evils" of gay marriage and other distractions are jangled in front of them, then yes, I have to question their intelligence, and their priorities. If that makes me an arrogant assh*le who questions what they think is best for them in your eyes, then there's nothing I can do to dissuade you.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

18 Oct 2014, 11:46 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Sure, someone is entitled to believe banning gay marriage is more important than civil or labor rights, but it flies in the face of common sense. So if you think I'm being condescending, then fine, but putting "hot button" ideas ahead of one's legitimate self interest for the sake of fear or prejudice is nonsensical as far as I'm concerned.


You're still assuming that you know best and that everyone who thinks otherwise must be brainwashed or acting on some kind of religious nuttery, as opposed to having legitimately come to their beliefs. Take me, I support a lot of things that you'd think would be against my interests, but I've come to a different conclusion based on evidence and logic; do you really think you know my interests better than I do? Or, to put a finer point on it, do you think you're smarter and better informed than I am, and have a better grasp of what is and is not in my best interest?


If we're talking about people who are swayed to vote against their own economic and social interests when the "evils" of gay marriage and other distractions are jangled in front of them, then yes, I have to question their intelligence, and their priorities. If that makes me an arrogant assh*le who questions what they think is best for them in your eyes, then there's nothing I can do to dissuade you.


And the right thinks the left is voting against their own economic and social interests.
That's why there is a right and a left.
Do you even believe in a two party system?


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

18 Oct 2014, 11:51 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
It certainly does disenfranchise people in low income areas when local licensing offices are closed, making people travel miles for said ID - making it harder if they don't have their own cars, and the office isn't open every day.

I sincerely wonder if the local licensing offices were close due to vandalism or burglary ; both very common occurrences in said low income areas. I can't blame them for closing offices that are being vandalised more than what could be considered normal.


Blaming it on poor people, now? From what I understand, no.


Wut?
Oh, so you're saying that low income areas aren't fraught with vandalism and burglary to name few crimes?
On what planet do you live?

BTW: You're missing a good pissing contest in the current events forum (it should have been started here). It's about the republican governor of S. Carolina sucking up to CEO's and marginalising minorities over the confederate flag. Make sure you start from the very beginning. :D


I'm saying vandalism was not the reason why any licensing offices were shut down - rather, the lame excuse of budget cuts was used. As those budget cuts were only in poor areas, I have to think something smells like bullsh*t.

So you're saying that the "lower income" areas are not vandalism heavy and the voter registration offices and/or voting polls were shut down just out of the spite that all of us conservatives carry in our evil and hard little hearts? :roll:


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

18 Oct 2014, 3:05 pm

Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
It certainly does disenfranchise people in low income areas when local licensing offices are closed, making people travel miles for said ID - making it harder if they don't have their own cars, and the office isn't open every day.

I sincerely wonder if the local licensing offices were close due to vandalism or burglary ; both very common occurrences in said low income areas. I can't blame them for closing offices that are being vandalised more than what could be considered normal.


Blaming it on poor people, now? From what I understand, no.


Wut?
Oh, so you're saying that low income areas aren't fraught with vandalism and burglary to name few crimes?
On what planet do you live?

BTW: You're missing a good pissing contest in the current events forum (it should have been started here). It's about the republican governor of S. Carolina sucking up to CEO's and marginalising minorities over the confederate flag. Make sure you start from the very beginning. :D


I'm saying vandalism was not the reason why any licensing offices were shut down - rather, the lame excuse of budget cuts was used. As those budget cuts were only in poor areas, I have to think something smells like bullsh*t.

So you're saying that the "lower income" areas are not vandalism heavy and the voter registration offices and/or voting polls were shut down just out of the spite that all of us conservatives carry in our evil and hard little hearts? :roll:


Again, there were no reports of vandalism. The offices were shut down specifically to keep ID's out of enough people's hands in order to sway the next election in favor of conservative candidates.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

18 Oct 2014, 3:11 pm

Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Sure, someone is entitled to believe banning gay marriage is more important than civil or labor rights, but it flies in the face of common sense. So if you think I'm being condescending, then fine, but putting "hot button" ideas ahead of one's legitimate self interest for the sake of fear or prejudice is nonsensical as far as I'm concerned.


You're still assuming that you know best and that everyone who thinks otherwise must be brainwashed or acting on some kind of religious nuttery, as opposed to having legitimately come to their beliefs. Take me, I support a lot of things that you'd think would be against my interests, but I've come to a different conclusion based on evidence and logic; do you really think you know my interests better than I do? Or, to put a finer point on it, do you think you're smarter and better informed than I am, and have a better grasp of what is and is not in my best interest?


If we're talking about people who are swayed to vote against their own economic and social interests when the "evils" of gay marriage and other distractions are jangled in front of them, then yes, I have to question their intelligence, and their priorities. If that makes me an arrogant assh*le who questions what they think is best for them in your eyes, then there's nothing I can do to dissuade you.


And the right thinks the left is voting against their own economic and social interests.
That's why there is a right and a left.
Do you even believe in a two party system?


How, by supporting LGBT rights, which is the new civil rights struggle, or by voting for candidates that oppose organized labor, raising the minimum wage, or oppose outsourcing? They can believe that all they want, but that only proves they probably act out of strict ideology, or are ignorant and fearful, or are possibly even insane.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

19 Oct 2014, 11:05 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
How, by supporting LGBT rights, which is the new civil rights struggle,

It's not everyone's forte so not everyone has a dog in that fight. Besides, it doesnt even matter what the left or right want because what's coming can't be stopped.

Quote:
or by voting for candidates that oppose organized labor,

If it was up to the left even fast food establishments would be union. Of course then they'd be the first to b***h about the high prices as a result. :roll:

Quote:
raising the minimum wage,

A very temporary fix to a bigger problem.

Quote:
or oppose outsourcing?

Are you aware of how many foreign owned companies are outsourcing to the US?
For the sake of brevity I'll give you just a few examples: Toyota, Nissan, BMW, Rolls Royce, Honda, Thyssen Krupp, Siemens, BASF, Daimler, etc....

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/05/15/foreign-manufacturers-bringing-jobs-to-us/2070327/

We outsource, they outsource, and in this global economy it could easily be considered progress (hmm....who have I heard use that term recently? :chin: ) but since it's not part of the liberal narrative I guess it's not real progress, eh..... :roll:

Quote:
They can believe that all they want, but that only proves they probably act out of strict ideology, or are ignorant and fearful, or are possibly even insane.

Ah, there it is; we're ignorant, fearful, and insane.
You just answered my question about whether or not you believe in a two party system.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

19 Oct 2014, 4:37 pm

Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
How, by supporting LGBT rights, which is the new civil rights struggle,

It's not everyone's forte so not everyone has a dog in that fight. Besides, it doesnt even matter what the left or right want because what's coming can't be stopped.

Quote:
or by voting for candidates that oppose organized labor,

If it was up to the left even fast food establishments would be union. Of course then they'd be the first to b***h about the high prices as a result. :roll:

Quote:
raising the minimum wage,

A very temporary fix to a bigger problem.

Quote:
or oppose outsourcing?

Are you aware of how many foreign owned companies are outsourcing to the US?
For the sake of brevity I'll give you just a few examples: Toyota, Nissan, BMW, Rolls Royce, Honda, Thyssen Krupp, Siemens, BASF, Daimler, etc....

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/05/15/foreign-manufacturers-bringing-jobs-to-us/2070327/

We outsource, they outsource, and in this global economy it could easily be considered progress (hmm....who have I heard use that term recently? :chin: ) but since it's not part of the liberal narrative I guess it's not real progress, eh..... :roll:

Quote:
They can believe that all they want, but that only proves they probably act out of strict ideology, or are ignorant and fearful, or are possibly even insane.

Ah, there it is; we're ignorant, fearful, and insane.
You just answered my question about whether or not you believe in a two party system.


The rights of our fellow citizens should be reason for everyone to have a dog in the fight.
As for unionizing fast food - as plenty of people depend on such employment probably as permanent income rather than just as a stepping stone to bigger and better things, it's only right that the workers get a living wage.
Sure, there is outsourcing from other countries, but how many of those companies leave not only individual workers but also whole communities economically devastated because said companies hadn't just started new factories, but had relocated said workplaces at the expense of workers? Big business in Germany and Japan in fact show more caring for their workers than the bastards CEO's over here.
And yes, I believe in the two party system, even if I'm not always charitable to the opposition. Are conservatives the only ones who have the right to be critical of their political opponents?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

19 Oct 2014, 6:20 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
The rights of our fellow citizens should be reason for everyone to have a dog in the fight.

Except, of course, for the rights you think are passé.

Quote:
As for unionizing fast food - as plenty of people depend on such employment probably as permanent income rather than just as a stepping stone to bigger and better things, it's only right that the workers get a living wage.

What's a living wage?
What's living?
What about when that "living wage" drives prices up to where stores are closed down and people end up unemployed? So much for the living wage then.

Quote:
Sure, there is outsourcing from other countries, but how many of those companies leave not only individual workers but also whole communities economically devastated because said companies hadn't just started new factories, but had relocated said workplaces at the expense of workers? Big business in Germany and Japan in fact show more caring for their workers than the bastards CEO's over here.

Some of our work goes over there, some of their work comes over here. Money IS the bottom line in business because that's why they are in business. If you people could just wrap your collective little minds around that...... :roll:

Quote:
And yes, I believe in the two party system, even if I'm not always charitable to the opposition. Are conservatives the only ones who have the right to be critical of their political opponents?
It doesn't show...........


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

19 Oct 2014, 7:46 pm

Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
The rights of our fellow citizens should be reason for everyone to have a dog in the fight.

Except, of course, for the rights you think are passé.

Quote:
As for unionizing fast food - as plenty of people depend on such employment probably as permanent income rather than just as a stepping stone to bigger and better things, it's only right that the workers get a living wage.

What's a living wage?
What's living?
What about when that "living wage" drives prices up to where stores are closed down and people end up unemployed? So much for the living wage then.

Quote:
Sure, there is outsourcing from other countries, but how many of those companies leave not only individual workers but also whole communities economically devastated because said companies hadn't just started new factories, but had relocated said workplaces at the expense of workers? Big business in Germany and Japan in fact show more caring for their workers than the bastards CEO's over here.

Some of our work goes over there, some of their work comes over here. Money IS the bottom line in business because that's why they are in business. If you people could just wrap your collective little minds around that...... :roll:

Quote:
And yes, I believe in the two party system, even if I'm not always charitable to the opposition. Are conservatives the only ones who have the right to be critical of their political opponents?
It doesn't show...........

What rights do I think are passe'?
And raising wages would give people more money in their pockets, thus more buying power, putting said money back into the economy, which grows. Provide medical benefits, and workers have more dispensable income available to spend, making the economy grow even more. Instead of being detrimental, those wage increases should be seen as investments into the economy. I thought you conservatives were constantly telling us that capitalism would make us all happy and wealthy, but so far your plans for the captains of industry reaping the benefits while keeping wages low for the sake of low prices only keeps the economy stagnant for most of us. That's why most of us no longer have any faith in the free market system anymore.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

19 Oct 2014, 8:38 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
What rights do I think are passe'?

Namely, the one I'm reluctant to name since that would spiral into the usual abyss. Aside from that, you all seem to have an issue with freedom of speech and expression for anything you decree as "hate" or "hate speech" to the point of wanting to suppress it or see people punished for it.
'
Quote:
And raising wages would give people more money in their pockets, thus more buying power, putting said money back into the economy, which grows. Provide medical benefits, and workers have more dispensable income available to spend, making the economy grow even more. Instead of being detrimental, those wage increases should be seen as investments into the economy.
It aint gonna happen for fast food. Fast food employment is only until something better comes along or if one moves up to management.
If Burger King goes union and Wendy's doesnt, guess who will get more business.

Quote:
I thought you conservatives were constantly telling us that capitalism would make us all happy and wealthy, but so far your plans for the captains of industry reaping the benefits while keeping wages low for the sake of low prices only keeps the economy stagnant for most of us. That's why most of us no longer have any faith in the free market system anymore.

We conservatives, evil and heartless as we are, are pragmatists whereas you liberals believe in some kind of worker's utopia that never was and never can be.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,241
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

19 Oct 2014, 9:05 pm

Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
What rights do I think are passe'?

Namely, the one I'm reluctant to name since that would spiral into the usual abyss. Aside from that, you all seem to have an issue with freedom of speech and expression for anything you decree as "hate" or "hate speech" to the point of wanting to suppress it or see people punished for it.
'
Quote:
And raising wages would give people more money in their pockets, thus more buying power, putting said money back into the economy, which grows. Provide medical benefits, and workers have more dispensable income available to spend, making the economy grow even more. Instead of being detrimental, those wage increases should be seen as investments into the economy.
It aint gonna happen for fast food. Fast food employment is only until something better comes along or if one moves up to management.
If Burger King goes union and Wendy's doesnt, guess who will get more business.

Quote:
I thought you conservatives were constantly telling us that capitalism would make us all happy and wealthy, but so far your plans for the captains of industry reaping the benefits while keeping wages low for the sake of low prices only keeps the economy stagnant for most of us. That's why most of us no longer have any faith in the free market system anymore.

We conservatives, evil and heartless as we are, are pragmatists whereas you liberals believe in some kind of worker's utopia that never was and never can be.


I have never wanted to suppress anyone's ideas, I just insist on the right to counter them with my own ideas.
As far as McDonald's going union, but Wendy's doesn't - you make two moves ahead to unionize both, and any others before the corporate bosses can respond.
And regarding a worker's paradise - as a matter of fact, from the end of WWII and before the nightmare of trickle down economics, America might as well have been a worker's paradise. A working guy like my dad was able to buy a house with the wages he made, my mom was able to stay at home to raise me, and we enjoyed a happy, middle class existence. If that wasn't a worker's paradise, I have no idea what is.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer