It Had To Happen Sooner or Later - Gun Firing Drones!!

Page 2 of 5 [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 43
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,452
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

22 Jul 2015, 8:49 am

Image



Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,484
Location: Aux Arcs

22 Jul 2015, 9:50 am

Drones that shoot back??Hell yeah,target practice just got even more challenging.lol


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


AspieUtah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Brigham City, Utah

22 Jul 2015, 10:01 am

Misslizard wrote:
Drones that shoot back??Hell yeah,target practice just got even more challenging.lol

"Pull!"


_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

22 Jul 2015, 10:39 am

I watched the video. The thing looks as useless as tits on a bull as it is now. It needs an aiming and stabilization to be at all effective. He was an idiot for posting it online where the feds could see it in the first place. I would have kept it to myself while doing more work on it.....


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

22 Jul 2015, 10:50 am

Raptor wrote:
I watched the video. The thing looks as useless as tits on a bull as it is now. It needs an aiming and stabilization to be at all effective. He was an idiot for posting it online where the feds could see it in the first place. I would have kept it to myself while doing more work on it.....



Actually it looks dangerous as hell, like it could easily accidentally shoot someone. Agreed, they aren't going to program it to go on a mission any time soon but it does look reckless. It just keeps shooting and shooting. What a bad idea.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

22 Jul 2015, 10:58 am

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Raptor wrote:
I watched the video. The thing looks as useless as tits on a bull as it is now. It needs an aiming and stabilization to be at all effective. He was an idiot for posting it online where the feds could see it in the first place. I would have kept it to myself while doing more work on it.....



Actually it looks dangerous as hell, like it could easily accidentally shoot someone. Agreed, they aren't going to program it to go on a mission any time soon but it does look reckless. It just keeps shooting and shooting. What a bad idea.


No, a big enough and fast enough RC airplane with a live view camera where the user can kamakazi it into someone is more dangerous and also commercially off the shelf available. You're an anti is what's driving you to be a'feerd of a drone with a pistol on it. The fact that it's unstable and can't be aimed be damned.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

22 Jul 2015, 11:11 am

Raptor wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Raptor wrote:
I watched the video. The thing looks as useless as tits on a bull as it is now. It needs an aiming and stabilization to be at all effective. He was an idiot for posting it online where the feds could see it in the first place. I would have kept it to myself while doing more work on it.....



Actually it looks dangerous as hell, like it could easily accidentally shoot someone. Agreed, they aren't going to program it to go on a mission any time soon but it does look reckless. It just keeps shooting and shooting. What a bad idea.


No, a big enough and fast enough RC airplane with a live view camera where the user can kamakazi it into someone is more dangerous and also commercially off the shelf available. You're an anti is what's driving you to be a'feerd of a drone with a pistol on it. The fact that it's unstable and can't be aimed be damned.



That's the worst kind of scenario for an accident!

I am not an anti, I am a Responsi which means I support RESPONSIBLE gun ownership not this sort of crap.



Spiderpig
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,893

22 Jul 2015, 11:37 am

Murdering your neighbor, easier than ever. Sounds great.


_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.


ZenDen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2013
Age: 82
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,730
Location: On top of the world

22 Jul 2015, 11:38 am

Can CAREFULLY designed and organized "dog fights" be far behind? Airborne Battle-bots?



Spiderpig
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,893

22 Jul 2015, 11:40 am

Complete with collateral damage, for the sake of realism.


_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.


Campin_Cat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 63
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

22 Jul 2015, 11:50 am

AspieUtah wrote:
Misslizard wrote:
Drones that shoot back??Hell yeah,target practice just got even more challenging.lol

"Pull!"

LOLOL EXCELLENT quick wit----BOTH of yous!!







_________________
White female; age 59; diagnosed Aspie.
I use caps for emphasis----I'm NOT angry or shouting. I use caps like others use italics, underline, or bold.
"What we know is a drop; what we don't know, is an ocean." (Sir Isaac Newton)


BuyerBeware
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,476
Location: PA, USA

22 Jul 2015, 1:57 pm

I'm NOT an "anti." I have often been accused of being a rabid "pro."

I'm not interested in disagreeing with that accusation.

And I don't like the idea of ANYONE (official military, terrorist, hobbyist, survivalist, civilian, or otherwise) being able to kill by what amounts to remote control. I am not OK with the idea or the fact of actual killing resembling a video game. That's making it TOO DAMN EASY to pull the trigger without ever actually realizing that those targets are people.

"Fifty thousand feet and the sky's a brilliant blue. You fly for a while in that stillness, then you take a reading, press a button, drop your load. I'm a really lucky guy. If I couldn't fly, I wouldn't touch this war."

Nobody gets to be a bombardier without seeing the human results of dropping those bombs.

And nobody gets to kill on a monitor screen.

If it's not worth the risk of one's own life, not worth the risk of fully and agonizingly knowing you're a killer, and not worth dancing with PTSD, then it's not worth war. Sometimes it is worth those things. But we're known for abusing military action, and turning combat into Call of Duty just makes it TOO DAMN EASY.


_________________
"Alas, our dried voices when we whisper together are quiet and meaningless, as wind in dry grass, or rats' feet over broken glass in our dry cellar." --TS Eliot, "The Hollow Men"


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

22 Jul 2015, 2:39 pm

Spiderpig wrote:
Murdering your neighbor, easier than ever. Sounds great.


Why think so small? There are tons of deserving judges, prosecutors, politicians, etc out there who suddenly got a lot more vulnerable, especially if you swapped that unwieldy pistol out for an inline .22 with integrated suppressor, the kind that's easily made up on a manual metal lathe.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,484
Location: Aux Arcs

22 Jul 2015, 3:38 pm

Wonder if that drone will be featured in the next issue of Garden&Gun??I have some pesky raccoons eating blackberries in my garden.That would be handy,then there was the neighbor that was beating a drum all day......


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


Fugu
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Dec 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,074
Location: Dallas

22 Jul 2015, 5:44 pm

Dox47 wrote:
Spiderpig wrote:
Murdering your neighbor, easier than ever. Sounds great.


Why think so small? There are tons of deserving judges, prosecutors, politicians, etc out there who suddenly got a lot more vulnerable, especially if you swapped that unwieldy pistol out for an inline .22 with integrated suppressor, the kind that's easily made up on a manual metal lathe.
the utility of a pistol-wielding drone would be sharply curtailed by RF noise emitters being deployed. that's assuming the drones are not spotted on radar.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

23 Jul 2015, 10:18 am

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Raptor wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Raptor wrote:
I watched the video. The thing looks as useless as tits on a bull as it is now. It needs an aiming and stabilization to be at all effective. He was an idiot for posting it online where the feds could see it in the first place. I would have kept it to myself while doing more work on it.....



Actually it looks dangerous as hell, like it could easily accidentally shoot someone. Agreed, they aren't going to program it to go on a mission any time soon but it does look reckless. It just keeps shooting and shooting. What a bad idea.


No, a big enough and fast enough RC airplane with a live view camera where the user can kamakazi it into someone is more dangerous and also commercially off the shelf available. You're an anti is what's driving you to be a'feerd of a drone with a pistol on it. The fact that it's unstable and can't be aimed be damned.



That's the worst kind of scenario for an accident!

I am not an anti, I am a Responsi which means I support RESPONSIBLE gun ownership not this sort of crap.

You're an anti. I can go back and pick out plenty enough evidence supporting this. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck.....


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson