I'm NOT an "anti." I have often been accused of being a rabid "pro."
I'm not interested in disagreeing with that accusation.
And I don't like the idea of ANYONE (official military, terrorist, hobbyist, survivalist, civilian, or otherwise) being able to kill by what amounts to remote control. I am not OK with the idea or the fact of actual killing resembling a video game. That's making it TOO DAMN EASY to pull the trigger without ever actually realizing that those targets are people.
"Fifty thousand feet and the sky's a brilliant blue. You fly for a while in that stillness, then you take a reading, press a button, drop your load. I'm a really lucky guy. If I couldn't fly, I wouldn't touch this war."
Nobody gets to be a bombardier without seeing the human results of dropping those bombs.
And nobody gets to kill on a monitor screen.
If it's not worth the risk of one's own life, not worth the risk of fully and agonizingly knowing you're a killer, and not worth dancing with PTSD, then it's not worth war. Sometimes it is worth those things. But we're known for abusing military action, and turning combat into Call of Duty just makes it TOO DAMN EASY.
_________________
"Alas, our dried voices when we whisper together are quiet and meaningless, as wind in dry grass, or rats' feet over broken glass in our dry cellar." --TS Eliot, "The Hollow Men"