Page 3 of 5 [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

27 Aug 2009, 8:00 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Sand wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
skafather84 wrote:

I'm pretty sure it stopped being a small price in the 40's.


How many nukes have been used in anger since 1945?

Did you know more people died in Ted Kennedy's car than died from nuclear bombing since 1946.

ruveyn


Thousands of people have died producing the radioactive material for bombs. See http://www.deseretnews.com/article/1,51 ... 91,00.html


the same is true of other chemicals that have no radioactive components.

ruveyn


That's irrelevant.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

27 Aug 2009, 8:10 pm

Orwell wrote:
Not to mention from the incompetent use of peaceful nuclear technology at Chernobyl.
.


That does not count. That is Soviet incompetence in action. Our "Chernobyl", namely Three Mile Island killed few people than died in Ted Kennedy's car in 1969. Some party aparachik greased up with Vodka did the Chernobyl thing. The Soviets were terrible at quality control. Their nuclear power stations were worse than their automobile.

ruveyn



greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

27 Aug 2009, 8:31 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Don't hold your breath. Time travel will always be in the future. If time travel is possible where are the time travelers? Have we seen any?

I am, and I know until when you are gonna make it.

Ok, forgetting that I am a time traveler, there is the idea that traveling to the past could not be possible before the invention of the time machine, or to put it better, according to said hypothesis, it would not be possible to go before the point in time when the machine starts to function for the first time.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

27 Aug 2009, 10:28 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Not to mention from the incompetent use of peaceful nuclear technology at Chernobyl.
.


That does not count. That is Soviet incompetence in action. Our "Chernobyl", namely Three Mile Island killed few people than died in Ted Kennedy's car in 1969. Some party aparachik greased up with Vodka did the Chernobyl thing. The Soviets were terrible at quality control. Their nuclear power stations were worse than their automobile.

ruveyn

No one died at Three Mile Island, I thought. And yes, it was Soviet incompetence. Still, I said "incompetent" to begin with. If you do it wrong, you can screw up most anything.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

27 Aug 2009, 11:30 pm

Orwell wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Not to mention from the incompetent use of peaceful nuclear technology at Chernobyl.
.


That does not count. That is Soviet incompetence in action. Our "Chernobyl", namely Three Mile Island killed few people than died in Ted Kennedy's car in 1969. Some party aparachik greased up with Vodka did the Chernobyl thing. The Soviets were terrible at quality control. Their nuclear power stations were worse than their automobile.

ruveyn

No one died at Three Mile Island, I thought. And yes, it was Soviet incompetence. Still, I said "incompetent" to begin with. If you do it wrong, you can screw up most anything.


See this at casualties at Three Mile Island.

http://www.counterpunch.org/wasserman03242009.html



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

27 Aug 2009, 11:57 pm

Sand wrote:
See this at casualties at Three Mile Island.

http://www.counterpunch.org/wasserman03242009.html

A completely ridiculous article on many counts, to the point that it's not even worth debunking. The author obviously has an extreme bias and apparently did not feel the need to bother with fact-checking.

Nice conspiracy theory, though. You can always trust a compulsive tree-hugger to find a shadowy government/corporate plot that's giving all of us cancer while suppressing free energy.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

28 Aug 2009, 12:04 am

Orwell wrote:
Sand wrote:
See this at casualties at Three Mile Island.

http://www.counterpunch.org/wasserman03242009.html

A completely ridiculous article on many counts, to the point that it's not even worth debunking. The author obviously has an extreme bias and apparently did not feel the need to bother with fact-checking.

Nice conspiracy theory, though. You can always trust a compulsive tree-hugger to find a shadowy government/corporate plot that's giving all of us cancer while suppressing free energy.


An emotional response to the facts presented indicates they cannot be debunked so you might as well merely scream "foul" and hope it will go away.



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

28 Aug 2009, 8:31 am

Sand wrote:
An emotional response to the facts presented indicates they cannot be debunked so you might as well merely scream "foul" and hope it will go away.

Um, no. First, there is no documentation or evidence provided for any of the "facts." Second, many claims are just outright false on the face of it. (As just one example, the claim that the Chernobyl plant was state-of-the-art) Of course, the comparisons between TMI and Chernobyl do not apply because of the many differences in design, and are nothing better than ignorant fear-mongering. Finally, to lend the claims made any credence you must postulate a conspiracy among all known reputable sources of information about the TMI incident and instead trust the words of an obvious anti-nuclear fanatic who has a clear interest in discrediting nuclear power regardless of what the facts are.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

28 Aug 2009, 8:41 am

Sand wrote:
No one died at Three Mile Island, I thought. And yes, it was Soviet incompetence. Still, I said "incompetent" to begin with. If you do it wrong, you can screw up most anything.


See this at casualties at Three Mile Island.

http://www.counterpunch.org/wasserman03242009.html[/quote]

As I said (or attempted to say) fewer people died at TMI from the Incident than died in Senator Kennedy's car in 1969. One died in the Senator's car. Zero died at TMI.

ruveyn



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

28 Aug 2009, 8:47 am

parts wrote:
Well

Image


The only way for the "Christian Dark Age" not to have happened is that the Roman Empire actually survive and function. The Romans were among the most anti-intellectual nations that ever existed. Zero progress in mathematics and science happened in the Roman Empire. The Romans were the first to burn the library at Alexandria (later on the Muslims burned what the Romans did not burn). Had Rome survived there would have been virtually no scientific progress in the West.

With the collapse of the Roman empire an intellectual vacuum happened, filled in part, by the Greek scholars in Byzantium and later by Muslim and Jewish scholars. This lead to the re-emergence of Greek philosophy in Europe (something that most likely would not have happened if Rome remained intact). This in turn lead to the Renaissance and the rest, as is often said, is history.

The Christian Dark Age appeared to be a necessary step to the rebirth of Greek and Hellenic thought in Europe. Had Rome survived we would be little advanced beyond the Rome of the the Pax Romana.

ruveyn



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

28 Aug 2009, 10:07 am

ruveyn wrote:
parts wrote:
Well

Image


The only way for the "Christian Dark Age" not to have happened is that the Roman Empire actually survive and function. The Romans were among the most anti-intellectual nations that ever existed. Zero progress in mathematics and science happened in the Roman Empire. The Romans were the first to burn the library at Alexandria (later on the Muslims burned what the Romans did not burn). Had Rome survived there would have been virtually no scientific progress in the West.

With the collapse of the Roman empire an intellectual vacuum happened, filled in part, by the Greek scholars in Byzantium and later by Muslim and Jewish scholars. This lead to the re-emergence of Greek philosophy in Europe (something that most likely would not have happened if Rome remained intact). This in turn lead to the Renaissance and the rest, as is often said, is history.

The Christian Dark Age appeared to be a necessary step to the rebirth of Greek and Hellenic thought in Europe. Had Rome survived we would be little advanced beyond the Rome of the the Pax Romana.

ruveyn


You nor anyone else can say what might have happened had Rome survived.



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

28 Aug 2009, 11:31 am

Orwell wrote:
Sand wrote:
An emotional response to the facts presented indicates they cannot be debunked so you might as well merely scream "foul" and hope it will go away.

Um, no. First, there is no documentation or evidence provided for any of the "facts." Second, many claims are just outright false on the face of it. (As just one example, the claim that the Chernobyl plant was state-of-the-art) Of course, the comparisons between TMI and Chernobyl do not apply because of the many differences in design, and are nothing better than ignorant fear-mongering. Finally, to lend the claims made any credence you must postulate a conspiracy among all known reputable sources of information about the TMI incident and instead trust the words of an obvious anti-nuclear fanatic who has a clear interest in discrediting nuclear power regardless of what the facts are.


Here is another analysis of the damages and how they were officially swept under the rug.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-ke ... 79955.html



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

28 Aug 2009, 2:25 pm

What's with the constant, sheep-like repetition of the mantra "There is no such thing as a safe dose of radiation" that I keep hearing in these articles? We're constantly bombarded with radiation. Without radiation from the sun, we would be dead.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Henriksson
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Nov 2008
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,534
Location: Sweden

28 Aug 2009, 2:32 pm

ruveyn wrote:
parts wrote:
Well

Image


The only way for the "Christian Dark Age" not to have happened is that the Roman Empire actually survive and function. The Romans were among the most anti-intellectual nations that ever existed. Zero progress in mathematics and science happened in the Roman Empire. The Romans were the first to burn the library at Alexandria (later on the Muslims burned what the Romans did not burn). Had Rome survived there would have been virtually no scientific progress in the West.

With the collapse of the Roman empire an intellectual vacuum happened, filled in part, by the Greek scholars in Byzantium and later by Muslim and Jewish scholars. This lead to the re-emergence of Greek philosophy in Europe (something that most likely would not have happened if Rome remained intact). This in turn lead to the Renaissance and the rest, as is often said, is history.

The Christian Dark Age appeared to be a necessary step to the rebirth of Greek and Hellenic thought in Europe. Had Rome survived we would be little advanced beyond the Rome of the the Pax Romana.

ruveyn

The Romans built this:

Image

People who lived there after the fall of the Roman Empire had no idea how the heck they built it. It turned out to be something rediscovered many hundred years later - concrete.

It was the Muslims who kept Greek and Hellenic thought alive, BTW, not the Christians.


_________________
"Purity is for drinking water, not people" - Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.


Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

28 Aug 2009, 2:33 pm

Orwell wrote:
What's with the constant, sheep-like repetition of the mantra "There is no such thing as a safe dose of radiation" that I keep hearing in these articles? We're constantly bombarded with radiation. Without radiation from the sun, we would be dead.


And here I thought you had some scientific knowhow. Don't you know the difference between gamma radiation and infra red?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

28 Aug 2009, 3:07 pm

Sand wrote:
Orwell wrote:
What's with the constant, sheep-like repetition of the mantra "There is no such thing as a safe dose of radiation" that I keep hearing in these articles? We're constantly bombarded with radiation. Without radiation from the sun, we would be dead.


And here I thought you had some scientific knowhow. Don't you know the difference between gamma radiation and infra red?


We also get ultra violet and some gamma radiation from the sun. Fortunately most of the radiant energy is in the green to yellow part of the visible spectrum and most of the short wavelength (high energy stuff) is stopped by atmosphere. However people who fly above 20,000 ft. m.s.l. receive ionizing radiation from the sun. We also get a certain amount of ionizing radiation from cosmic rays. The earth and its atmosphere are constantly bombarded by charged particles which travel at nearly the speed of light. When they colide with the atmosphere (those that make it through the Van Allen Belt) there is ionizing Compton radiation.

In addition we receive doses of ionizing radiation from the earth itself. All the magma spewed by volcanoes have a portion of radioactive heavy elements.

Piles of coal ash and tailings also are loaded with radioactive polonium and radioactive thorium.

ruveyn