5 Ridiculous Gun Myths Everyone Believes (Thanks to Movies)

Page 3 of 5 [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

HerrGrimm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 987
Location: United States

13 May 2011, 9:30 pm

RedHanrahan wrote:
My points have more to do with Politics, Philosophy and Religion than this entire thread, perhaps I am re-railing it, or at least steering it into this forum


EDIT: Read 'flame bait', then fell for it. Edited to minimize damage.


_________________
"You just like to go around rebuking people with your ravenous wolf face and snarling commentary." - Ragtime


RedHanrahan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Sep 2007
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,204
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand

13 May 2011, 9:38 pm

HerrGrimm wrote:
RedHanrahan wrote:
My points have more to do with Politics, Philosophy and Religion than this entire thread, perhaps I am re-railing it, or at least steering it into this forums parameters, are there not dozens of testosterone pumped forums for right wing reactionarys and gun nuts?


Maybe I would believe your views on America, you know, IF YOU ACTUALLY WERE AMERICAN. I would be filthy rich every time I hear some foreigner who has never set foot in the country (or something like that) flame us. Keep to your own soil. If you actually read a textbook or do some Internet searching in between being in the pasture herding sheep, you would realize that MAYBE you are wrong. And I know that for a fact, I am not flaming at all, just admit it, all New Zealanders live on a farm with sheep. Just as plausible as what you say about us. Shut up.


please elaborate?

As for my right to comment on the US I do have that right, in fact everyone has the right to comment on anything anywhere if they have information and opinion, if they didn't then the tyrants and murderers, the theives and rapists of the world would go unstopped. I see US citizens comment on things outside the US all the time often based on pathetic levels of information, they have that right and others have the right to challenge it.
If you personally cannot handle that then it is your issue, probably tied to your rabid xenophobia/nationalism, I would suggest you get over it and accept that the other 6.7 billion of us are out here and we have just the same rights as you.


_________________
Just because we can does not mean we should.

What vision is left? And is anyone asking?

Have a great day!


HerrGrimm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 987
Location: United States

13 May 2011, 9:43 pm

RedHanrahan wrote:
HerrGrimm wrote:
RedHanrahan wrote:
My points have more to do with Politics, Philosophy and Religion than this entire thread, perhaps I am re-railing it, or at least steering it into this forums parameters, are there not dozens of testosterone pumped forums for right wing reactionarys and gun nuts?


Maybe I would believe your views on America, you know, IF YOU ACTUALLY WERE AMERICAN. I would be filthy rich every time I hear some foreigner who has never set foot in the country (or something like that) flame us. Keep to your own soil. If you actually read a textbook or do some Internet searching in between being in the pasture herding sheep, you would realize that MAYBE you are wrong. And I know that for a fact, I am not flaming at all, just admit it, all New Zealanders live on a farm with sheep. Just as plausible as what you say about us. Shut up.


please elaborate?

As for my right to comment on the US I do have that right, in fact everyone has the right to comment on anything anywhere if they have information and opinion, if they didn't then the tyrants and murderers, the theives and rapists of the world would go unstopped. I see US citizens comment on things outside the US all the time often based on pathetic levels of information, they have that right and others have the right to challenge it.
If you personally cannot handle that then it is your issue, probably tied to your rabid xenophobia/nationalism, I would suggest you get over it and accept that the other 6.7 billion of us are out here and we have just the same rights as you.


Added to sig. You proved my point nicely.


_________________
"You just like to go around rebuking people with your ravenous wolf face and snarling commentary." - Ragtime


RedHanrahan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Sep 2007
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,204
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand

13 May 2011, 9:49 pm

HerrGrimm wrote:
RedHanrahan wrote:
HerrGrimm wrote:
RedHanrahan wrote:
My points have more to do with Politics, Philosophy and Religion than this entire thread, perhaps I am re-railing it, or at least steering it into this forums parameters, are there not dozens of testosterone pumped forums for right wing reactionarys and gun nuts?


Maybe I would believe your views on America, you know, IF YOU ACTUALLY WERE AMERICAN. I would be filthy rich every time I hear some foreigner who has never set foot in the country (or something like that) flame us. Keep to your own soil. If you actually read a textbook or do some Internet searching in between being in the pasture herding sheep, you would realize that MAYBE you are wrong. And I know that for a fact, I am not flaming at all, just admit it, all New Zealanders live on a farm with sheep. Just as plausible as what you say about us. Shut up.


please elaborate?

As for my right to comment on the US I do have that right, in fact everyone has the right to comment on anything anywhere if they have information and opinion, if they didn't then the tyrants and murderers, the theives and rapists of the world would go unstopped. I see US citizens comment on things outside the US all the time often based on pathetic levels of information, they have that right and others have the right to challenge it.
If you personally cannot handle that then it is your issue, probably tied to your rabid xenophobia/nationalism, I would suggest you get over it and accept that the other 6.7 billion of us are out here and we have just the same rights as you.


Added to sig. You proved my point nicely.


Again, please elaborate? In what way have I proven your point, have you not made posts that betray a rabid xenophobia, did not your response to my post display xenophobic tendencies - your refusal to let foreigners pass comment is typical of a xenophobe, your resorting to an out of date cultural cliche in an attempt to insult me and undermine my argument betrayed that you think in nationalistic terms as have other posts by you. Please show some intelligence and reason or perhaps it is you that should hold his counsel.


_________________
Just because we can does not mean we should.

What vision is left? And is anyone asking?

Have a great day!


AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

13 May 2011, 10:24 pm

Raptor wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
Raptor wrote:
“The AK-47 is the best assault rifle”.

Very good for what it is but by no means the best.
Where it shines and why you see so many of them in world news are for these reasons to name a few.
1. As firearm manufacturing goes AK-47’s (and their variants; AK-74, RPK, etc..) are easy and inexpensive to manufacture.
2. Very reliable in and robust in their design and construction. Very adept to use in harsh environments.
3. Relatively simple, easy to operate ( not to be mistaken for proficiency), and maintain which makes them a good choice for those that don't have and will never receive much in the way of training.
Yeah saying it's the best assault rifle is like saying a hammer is better than a screwdriver. I'd personally take an AR-15 over an AK-47. Its in line stock, DI system which gives it lighter weight + better accuracy + smoother recoil, and the fact that the upper receiver completely separates from the lower receiver trumps the AK's reliability to me. You can use a 7.62x39mm upper, which is really cool since you have the same calibre as the AK plus the perks of the AR-15. I'd be fine with 5.56x45/.223 though as long as I'm using a 20 inch barrel.


I'm an AR fan, too, for pretty much all the same reasons. I've got a ton of $$$ tied up in my Bushmaster M4 to get it where I want it to be.
The AR is an awesome platform.
Definitely. I really wish the AR-15 was unrestricted up here. All I could do with a restricted licence is shoot it at a range and that's it. The stupid thing is that it is restricted merely by name. No, not by criteria since it fits barrel regulations, overall length, and is semi auto. But by name since its political incorrect appearance somehow makes it more lethal. That's how stupid our gun laws are.

Raptor wrote:
RedHanrahan wrote:
Over one million US citizens killed by other citizens since 1962 using guns and they won't regulate, Just over 3000 US citizens killed by Islamic terrorism [probably with the colusion of US citizens] and they start two illegal wars - thats some dumb monkeys.

peace j

Quote:
Don't get me started. I'll bring facts to the table whenever you're ready.

This one will be boringly easy to shoot down. :roll:
Yeah this one's laughable, but I'm sure he's got some more myths to bring to the table so if he wants to try harder than that then I'll be more than happy to address whatever comes up, despite the fact that he's obviously trolling.

Cmon red, at least give me a challenge:
Image
http://www.gunmyths.com/2009/01/05/myth ... -to-crime/

And please explain these numbers:
Quote:
Advocates of gun control want us to believe that banning private gun ownership will reduce violent crime. In 1996, in the wake of a mass shooting, the Australian government seized more than 640,000 guns from its citizens. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, in the next two years, armed robbery rose by 73%, unarmed robbery by 28%, kidnaping by 38%, assault by 17% and manslaughter by 29%.

Quote:
Another rate that will strike terror in the heart of every woman is the rate of hot burglaries, which are burglaries that take place when people are home. I think one of my worst nightmares would be to wake up in the dead of night to find an intruder in my room. Yet, most criminals in this country know that breaking in with people home is a good way to get shot. In fact, if someone were to break into my home when we are home, that is exactly what will happen. The hot burglary rate in the U.S. is 13%. However, in countries with strict gun control, such as England and Canada, the hot burglary rate is closer to 50%. The criminals know that their victims, having been rendered helpless by their governments, cannot defend themselves.

http://www.discerningtoday.org/members/ ... 20Work.htm

And of course I saved the best for last...
Quote:
"Violent crime rates are highest overall in states with laws severely limiting or prohibiting the carrying of concealed firearms for self-defense". (FBI Uniform Crime Reports, 1992)



John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

13 May 2011, 11:46 pm

[quote="RedHanrahan"Over one million US citizens killed by other citizens since 1962 using guns and they won't regulate, Just over 3000 US citizens killed by Islamic terrorism [probably with the colusion of US citizens] and they start two illegal wars - thats some dumb monkeys.[/quote]

Can you please show where those statistics are coming from, and who is included in them?


_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud


John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

13 May 2011, 11:50 pm

Raptor wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
Raptor wrote:
“The AK-47 is the best assault rifle”.

Very good for what it is but by no means the best.
Where it shines and why you see so many of them in world news are for these reasons to name a few.
1. As firearm manufacturing goes AK-47’s (and their variants; AK-74, RPK, etc..) are easy and inexpensive to manufacture.
2. Very reliable in and robust in their design and construction. Very adept to use in harsh environments.
3. Relatively simple, easy to operate ( not to be mistaken for proficiency), and maintain which makes them a good choice for those that don't have and will never receive much in the way of training.
Yeah saying it's the best assault rifle is like saying a hammer is better than a screwdriver. I'd personally take an AR-15 over an AK-47. Its in line stock, DI system which gives it lighter weight + better accuracy + smoother recoil, and the fact that the upper receiver completely separates from the lower receiver trumps the AK's reliability to me. You can use a 7.62x39mm upper, which is really cool since you have the same calibre as the AK plus the perks of the AR-15. I'd be fine with 5.56x45/.223 though as long as I'm using a 20 inch barrel.


I'm an AR fan, too, for pretty much all the same reasons. I've got a ton of $$$ tied up in my Bushmaster M4 to get it where I want it to be.
The AR is an awesome platform.

I love my SKS, though my AR (A2) is far more accurate and has minimal recoil. I'll report back once my AK is finished.


_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud


blunnet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,053

14 May 2011, 2:02 am

Interesting, I would imagine some of that would be Myth Busters' material.

Now, that apparently, gun control is being also discussed, I just have one question: "How come kids (from the youtube videos) are allowed to handle those weapons and not allowed to drink?"



DeaconBlues
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,661
Location: Earth, mostly

14 May 2011, 2:04 am

The point in that article I take issue with is using the gunfight in one of the Matrix movies to illustrate the Hollywood delusion that shooting a car will make it blow up. Any other film where that happens, sure, use that as an example - and it's not like there's any shortage of them. In those movies, however, it's established early on in the franchise that anyone who realizes the nature of the Matrix can manipulate the code to do impossible things (cf Trinity's leap between buildings and through a window that may have been smaller than she was while fleeing an Agent). Thus, it's quite possible that Morpheus made the bullet explode when it hit the car, then accelerated the explosion in the car itself further, by screwing with the Matrix itself.

OTOH, when that happens in Bad Boys, the only possible excuse is Rule of Cool...

Red, take a thorazine or something. You're starting to foam at the mouth, man.


_________________
Sodium is a metal that reacts explosively when exposed to water. Chlorine is a gas that'll kill you dead in moments. Together they make my fries taste good.


John_Browning
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range

14 May 2011, 2:13 am

Vigilans wrote:
Raptor wrote:
HerrGrimm wrote:
The biggest myth for me is that you can actually hold a pistol sideways while shooting.


You can but it makes you look like a 'tard.
Accuracy suffers, too..............


Yeah really... I've wondered as well, if its possible to get hit by your own spent casing if firing in that manner (say if its held at a ret*d enough 'gangsta angle'). I assume this is the right place to ask :lol:

Yes. It is also possible to get hit with your own spent casing if you are using good technique depending on which direction you are shooting relative to the direction of the wind.


_________________
"Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars."
- Unknown

"A fear of weapons is a sign of ret*d sexual and emotional maturity."
-Sigmund Freud


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

14 May 2011, 3:09 am

John_Browning wrote:
Raptor wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
Raptor wrote:
“The AK-47 is the best assault rifle”.

Very good for what it is but by no means the best.
Where it shines and why you see so many of them in world news are for these reasons to name a few.
1. As firearm manufacturing goes AK-47’s (and their variants; AK-74, RPK, etc..) are easy and inexpensive to manufacture.
2. Very reliable in and robust in their design and construction. Very adept to use in harsh environments.
3. Relatively simple, easy to operate ( not to be mistaken for proficiency), and maintain which makes them a good choice for those that don't have and will never receive much in the way of training.
Yeah saying it's the best assault rifle is like saying a hammer is better than a screwdriver. I'd personally take an AR-15 over an AK-47. Its in line stock, DI system which gives it lighter weight + better accuracy + smoother recoil, and the fact that the upper receiver completely separates from the lower receiver trumps the AK's reliability to me. You can use a 7.62x39mm upper, which is really cool since you have the same calibre as the AK plus the perks of the AR-15. I'd be fine with 5.56x45/.223 though as long as I'm using a 20 inch barrel.


I'm an AR fan, too, for pretty much all the same reasons. I've got a ton of $$$ tied up in my Bushmaster M4 to get it where I want it to be.
The AR is an awesome platform.

I love my SKS, though my AR (A2) is far more accurate and has minimal recoil. I'll report back once my AK is finished.


I kinda would like to get a Tavor TAR 21,

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0N7X0pvhQ4w[/youtube]



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

14 May 2011, 3:57 am

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
I kinda would like to get a Tavor TAR 21,


Cool gun, sadly not likely to show up on the US civilian market anytime soon since it doesn't meet our import requirements for sporting purposes and I don't think IMI or Rafael has any plans to open a domestic US plant. I'm also not sure that it meets the barrel length requirement to not be considered a short barreled rifle, thought that bullpup design can be deceiving as to the actual barrel length. I'd be particularly curious to get a good look at the trigger mechanism, getting a good trigger pull in a bullpup configuration is notoriously difficult, and I'd like to see if the Israelis managed to solve that issue.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

14 May 2011, 4:20 am

I'll add exaggerations on the availability and effectiveness of armor piercing bullets to the list of ridiculous myths; I particularly like the scene in Lethal Weapon 3 where Danny Glover shoots through a steel bulldozer blade using a .380 MAC11 loaded with "cop killer" bullets... :roll: I'd laugh, but then voters and politicians watch these movies and legislate based on them, giving us such laws as the ban on said imaginary "cop killer" bullets, a product which has never existed outside of Hollywood and thus necessarily requires laws that are vague and burdensome in application.

People being blown off their feet by gunfire is another prolific mistake, a weapon that powerful would be required by Newtonian physics to impart similar force to the firer, and guns just aren't that powerful. Getting hit by a car imparts much more force to a body, even powerful handguns only get into the hundreds of foot-pounds (some hunting calibers do break into the low thousands), which isn't nearly enough to fling someone across a room.

Exploding bullets, mercury tipped or otherwise are also largely mythical, not to mention dead useless even if they were available. Cutting notches in the tip just creates a crude hollowpoint, and rubbing garlic on them doesn't cause blood poisoning either. A Teflon coating does not make a bullet armor piercing, it was only used on some hard alloy bullets to protect the gun's bore from damage during firing; it does not allow the bullet to "slip through" Kevlar.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Last edited by Dox47 on 14 May 2011, 3:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

14 May 2011, 7:42 am

RedHanrahan wrote:

Quote:
Please show some intelligence and reason or perhaps it is you that should hold his counsel.


“Over one million US citizens killed by other citizens since 1962 using guns and they won't regulate, Just over 3000 US citizens killed by Islamic terrorism [probably with the colusion of US citizens] and they start two illegal wars - thats some dumb monkeys.”

How is that intelligent??
You imply that we’re monkeys and that we’ve started two illegal wars so that’s two insults right there.
You imply that the lost lives of 3000 Americans by terrorism aren’t worthy of some payback.
You don’t even specify what it is we’re supposed to be regulating, people or guns.
Both?



AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

14 May 2011, 8:20 am

Dox47 wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
I kinda would like to get a Tavor TAR 21,


Cool gun, sadly not likely to show up on the US civilian market anytime soon since it doesn't meet our import requirements for sporting purposes and I don't think IMI or Rafael has any plans to open a domestic US plant. I'm also not sure that it meets the barrel length requirement to not be considered a short barreled rifle, thought that bullpup design can be deceiving as to the actual barrel length. I'd be particularly curious to get a good look at the trigger mechanism, getting a good trigger pull in a bullpup configuration is notoriously difficult, and I'd like to see if the Israelis managed to solve that issue.
We can get TAR-21's up here, but they cost 3k 8O. It's a goddamn shame since they're non-restricted unlike AR-15's.



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,670
Location: Seattle-ish

14 May 2011, 3:16 pm

RedHanrahan wrote:
Over one million US citizens killed by other citizens since 1962 using guns and they won't regulate ...


For the record, their are over 22,000 laws on the books in the US regulating firearms. Interesting side note; violent crime dropped to historic lows during the same period that we really started to reform our gun laws to allow fewer restrictions, especially on concealed carry. I'm not going to argue a causal relationship, but I sure as hell will argue that allowing more people to carry guns didn't result in the wild west bloodbath that anti-gun organizations claimed would occur, quite the opposite in fact.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez