It seems being pro-life is correlated with being petty

Post Reply New Topic

A pro-lifer will never give up his money to provide welfare for pregnant women.

I only support abortion if both chicks are hot.

Choice is a powerful thing. Nobody should willingly give it away. Especially when it's not theirs to begin with.

In many ways, this is quite accurate.

Superior? Hardly. It's always interesting when someone thinks they know how I feel.

Irritating, really.

You've just proved my point. Thank you.

He's quoting XKCD.

Guys, this thread is for the most part rational enough that it has restored some portion of my faith in humanity. Thank you all.

I know.

Is that really giving a woman a choice when a social worker tells her that they are going to cut off her welfare if she has any more kids?

If having more kids impedes her ability to find work then she can choose to live on the street with all her children or she can choose to stop birthing more and raise the ones she has in a more comfortable setting. The right to choose comes with accountability for the repercusions of that decision.

Spoken like someone who is heavily invested in vitriol.

Good job, you've just proven both of our points and insulted your own intelligence.

is this really something that happens in the us of a?

I've heard of women deliberately having more kids in order to get a bigger welfare check (usually a claim made by right-wingers), but I don't know if that actually happens. I've never heard of someone's welfare getting cut off for having a kid.

Not a very helpful answer, sorry.

I am not letting you stay in your high horse when you were the one that actually brought insults to the thread in order to gloat about how superior you are for not getting involved in the discussion. For once it is such hypocrisy, you come so heavily invested in vitriol that puke your observations in a thread that was not originally intended to be a discussion about the legality of abortion and brag about how you are not invested in the discussion, really?

It is very telling actually. We were all having a discussion about a very lame site and its definitions of abortion. cw10 would try to derail it into an abortion discussion but he was civil at that (although the arguments were silly). In fact, the thread was quite peaceful until you had the need to accuse everyone of slinging s**t at each other. Really? And you come to tell me that you are the civil one? Hah. Perhaps the moral of the story is that it is good to release that negativity in good paragraphs insisting on terminology rather than keeping resentment for ages and then let it explode in a burst of insults in a random thread and trying to look civil in the process like you are doing. Either way, I hope that you gain some self-awareness from this whole anecdote.



On the other hand, you would like to pretend that this discussion is not important, well, it is. We are talking about the most basic freedom, freedom to do with your body what you feel is convenient. And idiots feel they can get government to mandate that freedom. No, I won't ever feel ashamed for taking this topic strongly, I would be ashamed if I bragged about how little I cared about this. And I would be ashamed if you could get away with saying that the other side has "perfectly rational points" without any opposition, not as long as I am able to post.

Since your points are utter BS, no, no one has proven them.


Haha, you can pretend otherwise but it is very transparent when you go through the problem of crashing some thread to mention how you are not getting involved in the discussion.

The same arguments for abortion can be made to justify infanticide.