Is "Stand your ground" helpful or dangerous?

Page 3 of 4 [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Tollorin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,178
Location: Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

23 Jul 2013, 10:50 am

With Stand Your Ground there is a rise of "justified" killing of black from white.

Image

http://io9.com/disturbing-chart-shows-rise-in-justified-killings-of-773490798



vermontsavant
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,110
Location: Left WP forever

23 Jul 2013, 10:55 am

Tollorin wrote:
With Stand Your Ground there is a rise of "justified" killing of black from white.

Image

http://io9.com/disturbing-chart-shows-rise-in-justified-killings-of-773490798
prfound social injustice and bigotry make some people more likely to commit crime.obviously there will be an increase in criminals being shot by citizens in states with stand your ground and or castle laws.

this not not definative proof that SYG laws are bigoted on face value


_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined


neilson_wheels
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,404
Location: London, Capital of the Un-United Kingdom

23 Jul 2013, 11:04 am

Tollorin - Have you read the original paper on this?

A quick read of the Frontline article shows that the 'White on Black' statistics are based on only 25 cases.

I don't have time to check the original to find the proportion of the 5000 homicides that are involved here.

It would be normal to include those figures with the chart.



0bey1sh1n0b1
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2013
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 138
Location: DMV Area

23 Jul 2013, 11:22 am

vermontsavant wrote:
Quote:

So you see my point. I may get some heat for this but I think gun ownership needs a little more education than just gun handling and background checks. If people are so determined to use guns as a defense then I think it is only fair that they be tested on the understanding of self defense law, understand their limits and options before owning a gun






all states require a gun safety course to buy a hand gun and most people who buy rifles are hunters which requires a hunters safety course.

i scored 100% on the hunters education coarse.whether or not that is sufficiant i am not sure.however as someone knows many gun owners, gun nuts and fanatics rarely or never hurt people with guns and most people who do hurt people with guns usualy dont like guns at all.they just use guns when it suites there purposes.people who use guns in crime buy guns on the street before they need them and when done destroy them.the search of the person or residence of a gun criminal usualy fails to turn up a gun


No I am not talking about training in gun handling I am talking about training of how to properly identify a threat and proper procedures to handle and if need be disable a possible threat.

Tollorin wrote:
With Stand Your Ground there is a rise of "justified" killing of black from white.

Image

http://io9.com/disturbing-chart-shows-rise-in-justified-killings-of-773490798


This is counter productive talk and very bias. If you are going to contribute you need to talk about SYG and not involve race. This isn't a debate on are Americans racist. I created this thread to span an intellectual topic that excludes all the moronic talks of race and racism. It is obvious that most of the people even talking about racism have not been on the other end nor have a clue what it is about which is why you post these opinionate statistics.



Geekonychus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2012
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,660

23 Jul 2013, 11:28 am

redriverronin wrote:
Inventor wrote:
b. Met force with like force.

By the story, gun pulled and fired from inches away, where a poke in the ribs would have ended the fight.

The right to defend yourself has to do with where you are. In your home, car, yes, but not standing on the Interstate shooting cars coming toward you.

As The Onion advised Black teens, live naked and fall to your knees and pray, making it hard for anyone to claim you are a threat. It also advised that they did not go out in public, staying home is best.

Now if the Banditos went into a Hells Angels bar, wearing colors, they could claim their lives were in danger, if would be a hard fact to refute. The Angels could make the same claim.

A lot of Black on Black crime is self defense. They never use the defense, they just vanish. That was a, him or me, situation.

The concept of anywhere anytime, and using deadly force against that unarmed girl who slapped you, is pushing reason, even if a martial arts master could kill with a slap.

All you did was tell her she had nice tits and to get in your car and do you a favor. That is not against the law.

The Police who do wander around, mostly wear uniforms, carry guns openly, wear hats, and identify themselves as The Police, for the benefit of blind people. Even in the worst of situations, they yell Police!

Now Zimmerman was not even wearing a hat. Neighborhood Watch is to watch, and call the Police. In Public Places the Police have an exclusive.

Second, I can recall no case where Neighborhood Watch killed an unarmed person for walking down their street. Not even an armed one.

Well, in Texas someone did shoot two burglers who were robbing the house next door. He was not Neighborhood Watch, just Texan. They did not live there and were carrying the TV out. He did call the police, then shot them. They were doing crime.

Zimmerman chased a teen around at night, by car, then on foot, and off the sidewalk, No doubt, this guy is after you, in the dark. That it turned out as it did, if it had been a real burgler, he would have been dead.

Stalking, menencing, are not mentioned in the Neighborhood Watch stuff, except to say, dont do it. When the Police do arrive, they do not park out front, two come from behind, and some guy standing in the backyard with a gun can wind up dead.

Martin had a reason to be there, Zimmerman did not. Martin was returning from the 7/11, and a hundred paces from his door.

I cannot see Martin turning and coming back to the man who has been following him. More likely, Zimmerman charged, closed the distance between them, and a surprised Martin punched him.

The story supports Martin withdrawing from conflict, and Zimmerman advancing.

Pictures from the night show Zimmerman with a gangbanger beard, casual clothes, and looking like someone defending his drug selling turf.

If stand your ground can be transferred out to the public space, and cover situations that you had more than a little to do with causing, it becomes legal murder.

Your home, your car, is your space, chasing a stranger down the side walk you lose the right to space.

I am old, it is hot, I go walking after dark. I take this personally.

My whole relationship with public space just changed, and my response to anyone who stalks me. Where ever I am, I will treat it like being in my home.


So you didn't see the case just what the media said and now you think that things happened exactly the opposite of what was shown during the trial. Where Zimmerman called the cops chased a sneak thief 20 feet then was told to stop and did went back to his truck and was then sucker punched and jumped. Me ive been stalked in public places and its not guys like Zimmerman that are the problem its guys like martin that are a problem to deal with people like Zimmerman you act calm and courteous let them know why you are there what you are doing. If martin had done that he would be alive but he did the exact opposite of that he blindsided a person. Why because that is what criminals like him do they don't think just act on the most greedy an ignorant thoughts they have lucky for us and Zimmerman we still have a system that can sometimes see through biased agendas and give us real justice. Ive learned to deal with people like Zimmerman my whole life they are hot headed and decent people who don't like to leave everything to cops who rarely do anything about crime. So he was watching over his and his neighbors property saw a potential criminal and did what anybody who has a dick and balls would do. If this changes your whole relationship with public space and the people in it then it was a good thing not a bad thing. There is no use in being blind in this world there are lots of guys like Trayvon Martin down in Louisiana so keep that in the back of you head.
Had nothing to do with his genitals. He never would have gone to confront the kid if he didn't have a pistol to offset his penis envy. A gun can make someone brave enough to do really stupid s**t.

Here you are blatantly arguing for vigilanty justice as if Martin deserved to die.......for doing what exactly? It's one thing to believe in Zimmerman's aquital. It's a whole other level of sociopathy to not see this death as a tragedy and even celebrate it.



albedo
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jul 2013
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 293

23 Jul 2013, 11:33 am

I think the problem is the law can't reflect the true reality of self defense situations. I train ii self defense regularly, and know that it is messy and uncertain it is. You have enough to focus on besides theoretical legal ideals.

Regarding 'stand your ground' it depend what it actually means in the jurisdiction. My understanding as a foreigner, is it don't relate to this case anyway. The case was never brought on that basis.

Regarding Zimmerman, I do think he felt threatened for his life.

However people wrongly assume Zimmerman's innocence implies Martin's guilt.

It is quite probable and the jury did reflect on this that Martin reaction was because he was threatened. How appropriate his reaction was is debatable, but he was not on trial.

There are criticism of both, in the even leading up to the shooting. However there is a difference from those mistakes, and in the moment self defense. You might say someone contributed to their situation, but everyone should have the right to take legal action in the moment.

The Jury rightly said this isn't a crime but a tragedy.



Last edited by albedo on 23 Jul 2013, 11:36 am, edited 3 times in total.

neilson_wheels
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,404
Location: London, Capital of the Un-United Kingdom

23 Jul 2013, 11:33 am

0bey1sh1n0b1 wrote:
vermontsavant wrote:
.they just use guns when it suites there purposes.people who use guns in crime buy guns on the street before they need them and when done destroy them.the search of the person or residence of a gun criminal usualy fails to turn up a gun


No I am not talking about training in gun handling I am talking about training of how to properly identify a threat and proper procedures to handle and if need be disable a possible threat.


I don't believe that your law enforcement officers receive full combat firearm training let alone threat identification and magic ninja tricks. All a bit fantasy I'm afraid.

Vermontservant - A lot of criminals will have a 'stash' spot for weapons that are known by a few individuals. The guns are far too valuable a tool for them to be destroyed.



Last edited by neilson_wheels on 23 Jul 2013, 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

0bey1sh1n0b1
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2013
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 138
Location: DMV Area

23 Jul 2013, 11:36 am

Geekonychus wrote:
redriverronin wrote:
Inventor wrote:
b. Met force with like force.

By the story, gun pulled and fired from inches away, where a poke in the ribs would have ended the fight.

The right to defend yourself has to do with where you are. In your home, car, yes, but not standing on the Interstate shooting cars coming toward you.

As The Onion advised Black teens, live naked and fall to your knees and pray, making it hard for anyone to claim you are a threat. It also advised that they did not go out in public, staying home is best.

Now if the Banditos went into a Hells Angels bar, wearing colors, they could claim their lives were in danger, if would be a hard fact to refute. The Angels could make the same claim.

A lot of Black on Black crime is self defense. They never use the defense, they just vanish. That was a, him or me, situation.

The concept of anywhere anytime, and using deadly force against that unarmed girl who slapped you, is pushing reason, even if a martial arts master could kill with a slap.

All you did was tell her she had nice tits and to get in your car and do you a favor. That is not against the law.

The Police who do wander around, mostly wear uniforms, carry guns openly, wear hats, and identify themselves as The Police, for the benefit of blind people. Even in the worst of situations, they yell Police!

Now Zimmerman was not even wearing a hat. Neighborhood Watch is to watch, and call the Police. In Public Places the Police have an exclusive.

Second, I can recall no case where Neighborhood Watch killed an unarmed person for walking down their street. Not even an armed one.

Well, in Texas someone did shoot two burglers who were robbing the house next door. He was not Neighborhood Watch, just Texan. They did not live there and were carrying the TV out. He did call the police, then shot them. They were doing crime.

Zimmerman chased a teen around at night, by car, then on foot, and off the sidewalk, No doubt, this guy is after you, in the dark. That it turned out as it did, if it had been a real burgler, he would have been dead.

Stalking, menencing, are not mentioned in the Neighborhood Watch stuff, except to say, dont do it. When the Police do arrive, they do not park out front, two come from behind, and some guy standing in the backyard with a gun can wind up dead.

Martin had a reason to be there, Zimmerman did not. Martin was returning from the 7/11, and a hundred paces from his door.

I cannot see Martin turning and coming back to the man who has been following him. More likely, Zimmerman charged, closed the distance between them, and a surprised Martin punched him.

The story supports Martin withdrawing from conflict, and Zimmerman advancing.

Pictures from the night show Zimmerman with a gangbanger beard, casual clothes, and looking like someone defending his drug selling turf.

If stand your ground can be transferred out to the public space, and cover situations that you had more than a little to do with causing, it becomes legal murder.

Your home, your car, is your space, chasing a stranger down the side walk you lose the right to space.

I am old, it is hot, I go walking after dark. I take this personally.

My whole relationship with public space just changed, and my response to anyone who stalks me. Where ever I am, I will treat it like being in my home.


So you didn't see the case just what the media said and now you think that things happened exactly the opposite of what was shown during the trial. Where Zimmerman called the cops chased a sneak thief 20 feet then was told to stop and did went back to his truck and was then sucker punched and jumped. Me ive been stalked in public places and its not guys like Zimmerman that are the problem its guys like martin that are a problem to deal with people like Zimmerman you act calm and courteous let them know why you are there what you are doing. If martin had done that he would be alive but he did the exact opposite of that he blindsided a person. Why because that is what criminals like him do they don't think just act on the most greedy an ignorant thoughts they have lucky for us and Zimmerman we still have a system that can sometimes see through biased agendas and give us real justice. Ive learned to deal with people like Zimmerman my whole life they are hot headed and decent people who don't like to leave everything to cops who rarely do anything about crime. So he was watching over his and his neighbors property saw a potential criminal and did what anybody who has a dick and balls would do. If this changes your whole relationship with public space and the people in it then it was a good thing not a bad thing. There is no use in being blind in this world there are lots of guys like Trayvon Martin down in Louisiana so keep that in the back of you head.
Had nothing to do with his genitals. He never would have gone to confront the kid if he didn't have a pistol to offset his penis envy. A gun can make someone brave enough to do really stupid sh**.

Here you are blatantly arguing for vigilanty justice as if Martin deserved to die.......for doing what exactly? It's one thing to believe in Zimmerman's aquital. It's a whole other level of sociopathy to not see this death as a tragedy and even celebrate it.


Here is the argument. Maybe giving him a gun gave him extra courage. Is that a bad thing? In some areas people live in fear of criminals and do nothing about it. Cops have their hands full and if they do get arrested lawyers will argue that they did nothing wrong. Now the criminals are back out on the streets and want revenge. The threats are real and we shouldn't sit hear and pretend that they aren't just because they don't happen in our own backyards.



0bey1sh1n0b1
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2013
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 138
Location: DMV Area

23 Jul 2013, 11:38 am

neilson_wheels wrote:
0bey1sh1n0b1 wrote:
vermontsavant wrote:
.they just use guns when it suites there purposes.people who use guns in crime buy guns on the street before they need them and when done destroy them.the search of the person or residence of a gun criminal usualy fails to turn up a gun


No I am not talking about training in gun handling I am talking about training of how to properly identify a threat and proper procedures to handle and if need be disable a possible threat.


I don't believe that your law enforcement officers receive full combat firearm training let alone threat identification and magic ninja tricks. All a bit fantasy I'm afraid.

Vermontservant - A lot of criminals will have a 'stash' spot for weapons that are known by a few individuals. The guns are far to valuable a tool to them to be destroyed.


Our law enforcement do. I'm not sure how they do it in the UK but our law enforcement are practically ready for war.



neilson_wheels
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,404
Location: London, Capital of the Un-United Kingdom

23 Jul 2013, 11:42 am

0bey1sh1n0b1 wrote:
Our law enforcement do. I'm not sure how they do it in the UK but our law enforcement are practically ready for war.


Well after discussion with a number of people who are knowledgeable on the subject I would have to say you are deluded.

Enthusiasm can sometimes over power experience.



0bey1sh1n0b1
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2013
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 138
Location: DMV Area

23 Jul 2013, 11:50 am

neilson_wheels wrote:
0bey1sh1n0b1 wrote:
Our law enforcement do. I'm not sure how they do it in the UK but our law enforcement are practically ready for war.


Well after discussion with a number of people who are knowledgeable on the subject I would have to say you are deluded.


I know people in law enforcement here. I know what they are capable of. You can even go on YouTube and look at some of our law enforcement training. Threat identification and how to properly disable a suspect are training procedures. If you can't identify a threat (if you don't know your enemy) how do you expect to properly take them down. Violence level here in the US is high so our police force need to be trained to deal with it. I'm not delusional these are facts and it's all over the web.

Point is and going back to what I was saying about giving people the privileges to carry guns is that if police get this training maybe it would be a good idea for civilians to have this training and not just some watered down can you point a gun away from you training.



neilson_wheels
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,404
Location: London, Capital of the Un-United Kingdom

23 Jul 2013, 12:03 pm

0bey1sh1n0b1 wrote:
I know people in law enforcement here. I know what they are capable of.


So you know some people, good stories, eh...... :wink:

Quote:
You can even go on YouTube and look at some of our law enforcement training.


So you see some 'premium' training on YT, every US law enforcement officer receives that training?

Quote:
Threat identification and how to properly disable a suspect are training procedures. If you can't identify a threat (if you don't know your enemy) how do you expect to properly take them down. Violence level here in the US is high so our police force need to be trained to deal with it. I'm not delusional these are facts and it's all over the web.


And cops never suffer injury or death while on duty due to failure to identify threat or unsuccessful application of classroom techniques?
Cops are human too, not robots.

Quote:
Point is and going back to what I was saying about giving people the privileges to carry guns is that if police get this training maybe it would be a good idea for civilians to have this training and not just some watered down can you point a gun away from you training.


I thought your point was to define and simplify the real life application of SYG law.



0bey1sh1n0b1
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2013
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 138
Location: DMV Area

23 Jul 2013, 12:14 pm

Quote:
And cops never suffer injury or death while on duty due to failure to identify threat or unsuccessful application of classroom techniques?
Cops are human too, not robots.


Never said they were robots. You said they didn't receive the training. I am saying that they do.

Quote:
I thought your point was to define and simplify the real life application of SYG law.


I never said simplify the application of SYG. If we wanted a simple solution then we'd ban guns all together and tell no one to have guns. No I seek to find best practices to compliment the SYG's efforts. If people who have privileges to conceal weapons are better trained. They can efficiently neutralize a target instead of killing them and have a better chance of proving self defense. Now I'm not an idiot I know that this isn't a full proof plan. But it's better than showing someone how to use a gun and then later learn the hard way that defending yourself is a lot harder than it looks.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

23 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm

Schneekugel wrote:
Raptor wrote:
I do not live in a gated community but we do call the cops on suspicious people snooping around and will continue to.


But I think thats what you cant compare. You call the cops: Trained people, that have routine in such situations, normally are able to keep calm in sterss situations and that are simply the cops. They dont need to follow you for minutes without an uniform, making you moer and more afraid of a criminal following you. Because of them being cops, they have a right to ask you, what you are doing here, and for your documents.

I dont mind anyone calling cops, if he thinks I am suspicious. They are professionals and trained to deal wth such situations in the best way. Thats what they do 9 hours a day, for years.

From my oppinion, that cant be compared with someone instead thinking to play "Wild West Sheriff" himself, following me as a stranger without any non-criminal cause, making me afraid and in the end, as it happened, causing without purpose an needless incident, that one of the involved costs his life. I dont blame him for being a murder, according to my countries laws. But we also have laws against causing someones death, without purpose, by simply acting really dumb and without thinking. Thats not seen as murder, and its absolutly not sentenced as hard as being a murder, its used for typical: "Idiot forget to use handbrake at the car and leaves car, and car starts to roll for itself and kills someone." So its not purpose but a deadly, needless accident, that could easily have been avoided.

And following someone like a criminal would do, causing the person I follow to be afraid, which in the end leaded to a needless confrontation, is for me such a thing. No planed murder, but a needless life gone, out of an dumb action. If it happened that way, sure it was dumb from the victim to hide and try to attack the "criminal" following him, himself, instead calling the police. But playing "Wild West Sheriff" and following a "suspicious" person instead of simply calling the police, as Raptor tells himself, was the first dumb, needless action, starting the series of dumb, needless actions.

That incident was in a gated community that had recently had multiple burglaries.

Quote:
For me as an outsider it is simply not to understand. A man was shot, it is proofen, who had the weapon in its hand and whenever it is about weapon laws its about "Its not the gun that kills people, but the human." So a human killed another one, and it is proofen. And I simply dont get it why there is absolutly no sentence for it, not even for that accidental killing by dumb action, as we have it. And I think, that causing someones death, because of the wish to play Sheriff himself as an not trained, unprofessional person, instead of simply calling the people that are professionally trained to do so, is a quiet dumb, really stupid action. Its hard to understand from outside, why there is absolute no jail, not even for "unpropper weapon use" or however it is called in your country.

Zimmerman was found not guilty by the jury. Not guilty means just that, nothing more and nothing less. Doesn't mean he was right or wrong or good or bad but simply not guilty based on the evidence and testimony presented before the jury.

Quote:
It makes people afraid of your laws and country. In the end, if I understood that "Stand your ground" right, if I walk without purpose into the wrong house, I can be shot and noone will ever ask. Maybe for you knowing that, it is hardly to imagine to walk into a foreign house, because of that laws you will look four times, before going into one. But as a foreigner, you dont think of such laws existing, so if you think you are right, and if you are not you think people inside will simply laugh, and give you the right direction. To think of that someone simply will shoot out of fun on me, only because of me walking into a wrong house, and not even be sentenced for that, is really weird as an outsider and makes someone afraid.

I've never been anywhere, USA or other countries, where people simply walked into stranger's homes. SYG applies to being out of your home but in a place you have a right to be and doing what you have a right to do.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


neilson_wheels
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,404
Location: London, Capital of the Un-United Kingdom

23 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm

0bey1sh1n0b1 wrote:
You said they didn't receive the training. I am saying that they do.


You are misreading again. I said most do not receive FULL COMBAT FIREARM TRAINING, that's not saying they don't go to the range or receive any training.

0bey1sh1n0b1 wrote:
I never said simplify the application of SYG.


If people do not understand when the SYG law applies how are they able to act within their rights?

I'm not going to be drawn on the US gun debate. I have much more firearm experience than the average person in the UK, is that relevant to the situation in the US? No.



Last edited by neilson_wheels on 23 Jul 2013, 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

23 Jul 2013, 1:09 pm

I almost didnt see you back there. :D

ScrewyWabbit wrote:
My answer is that of course these laws are dangerous. Situations should be defused whenever possible, not escalated or allowed to simmer unti, someone ends up dead, regardless of who is in the right and who is in the wrong. Unless however that you think someone ending up dead is any way a positive outcome, and unfortunately it seems that there are people out there who think exactly that.

Yeah, the law is dangerous to the would be murderer and rapist. Situations that can be defused normally are defused or we’d be hearing more about shootings. And, yes, my attacker ending up dead is better than me ending up dead but I can’t very well expect you to understand that.

Quote:
People for that reason should need to make a reasonable attempt to retreat. That doesn't mean turning around to get shot in the back, but if you're cornered or can't outrun the other person or can't safely retreat from the situation then that's one thing, otherwise you should try to get some distance between you and the other person. It's just common sense it seems to me.

Yes, well the law was enacted to help the innocent citizen instead of their would-be killer. If you knew anything about the laws regarding self defense you’d know SYG it’s not a get out of jail free card to be utilized to facilitate vigilantism or settle personal vendettas with. You can, in fact, wind up in prison over an unjustifiable shooting regardless of your self defense claim.

Quote:
On the other hand the gun lobby needs these laws. What's the point of owning a gun if you'll probably never get to use it for real? Of course for the self-defense minded they hope they'll never need to use it for real, but there's another group of people out there who want something to do with their toy and they at least think that these sorts of laws empower them to do exactly that. If the victims of such actions happen to fall into a category of person that these sorts of people can in their own good conscious classify as something less than quite human or otherwise undeserving of living, then in their minds there's little if any harm.

Ah yes; *hoplophobia, paranoia, and the obligatory accusation of racism all neatly rolled into one paragraph. I could feast on this all day, sentence by sentence, and write a mini-dissertation shredding it if I had the time and the inclination.

*Hoplophobia : Irrational, morbid fear of guns. May cause sweating, faintness, discomfort, rapid pulse, nausea, sleeplessness, more, at mere thought of guns.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson