Is "Stand your ground" helpful or dangerous?
Tollorin
Veteran

Joined: 14 Jun 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,178
Location: Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
With Stand Your Ground there is a rise of "justified" killing of black from white.
http://io9.com/disturbing-chart-shows-rise-in-justified-killings-of-773490798

http://io9.com/disturbing-chart-shows-rise-in-justified-killings-of-773490798
this not not definative proof that SYG laws are bigoted on face value
_________________
Forever gone
Sorry I ever joined
neilson_wheels
Veteran

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,404
Location: London, Capital of the Un-United Kingdom
Tollorin - Have you read the original paper on this?
A quick read of the Frontline article shows that the 'White on Black' statistics are based on only 25 cases.
I don't have time to check the original to find the proportion of the 5000 homicides that are involved here.
It would be normal to include those figures with the chart.
So you see my point. I may get some heat for this but I think gun ownership needs a little more education than just gun handling and background checks. If people are so determined to use guns as a defense then I think it is only fair that they be tested on the understanding of self defense law, understand their limits and options before owning a gun
all states require a gun safety course to buy a hand gun and most people who buy rifles are hunters which requires a hunters safety course.
i scored 100% on the hunters education coarse.whether or not that is sufficiant i am not sure.however as someone knows many gun owners, gun nuts and fanatics rarely or never hurt people with guns and most people who do hurt people with guns usualy dont like guns at all.they just use guns when it suites there purposes.people who use guns in crime buy guns on the street before they need them and when done destroy them.the search of the person or residence of a gun criminal usualy fails to turn up a gun
No I am not talking about training in gun handling I am talking about training of how to properly identify a threat and proper procedures to handle and if need be disable a possible threat.

http://io9.com/disturbing-chart-shows-rise-in-justified-killings-of-773490798
This is counter productive talk and very bias. If you are going to contribute you need to talk about SYG and not involve race. This isn't a debate on are Americans racist. I created this thread to span an intellectual topic that excludes all the moronic talks of race and racism. It is obvious that most of the people even talking about racism have not been on the other end nor have a clue what it is about which is why you post these opinionate statistics.
By the story, gun pulled and fired from inches away, where a poke in the ribs would have ended the fight.
The right to defend yourself has to do with where you are. In your home, car, yes, but not standing on the Interstate shooting cars coming toward you.
As The Onion advised Black teens, live naked and fall to your knees and pray, making it hard for anyone to claim you are a threat. It also advised that they did not go out in public, staying home is best.
Now if the Banditos went into a Hells Angels bar, wearing colors, they could claim their lives were in danger, if would be a hard fact to refute. The Angels could make the same claim.
A lot of Black on Black crime is self defense. They never use the defense, they just vanish. That was a, him or me, situation.
The concept of anywhere anytime, and using deadly force against that unarmed girl who slapped you, is pushing reason, even if a martial arts master could kill with a slap.
All you did was tell her she had nice tits and to get in your car and do you a favor. That is not against the law.
The Police who do wander around, mostly wear uniforms, carry guns openly, wear hats, and identify themselves as The Police, for the benefit of blind people. Even in the worst of situations, they yell Police!
Now Zimmerman was not even wearing a hat. Neighborhood Watch is to watch, and call the Police. In Public Places the Police have an exclusive.
Second, I can recall no case where Neighborhood Watch killed an unarmed person for walking down their street. Not even an armed one.
Well, in Texas someone did shoot two burglers who were robbing the house next door. He was not Neighborhood Watch, just Texan. They did not live there and were carrying the TV out. He did call the police, then shot them. They were doing crime.
Zimmerman chased a teen around at night, by car, then on foot, and off the sidewalk, No doubt, this guy is after you, in the dark. That it turned out as it did, if it had been a real burgler, he would have been dead.
Stalking, menencing, are not mentioned in the Neighborhood Watch stuff, except to say, dont do it. When the Police do arrive, they do not park out front, two come from behind, and some guy standing in the backyard with a gun can wind up dead.
Martin had a reason to be there, Zimmerman did not. Martin was returning from the 7/11, and a hundred paces from his door.
I cannot see Martin turning and coming back to the man who has been following him. More likely, Zimmerman charged, closed the distance between them, and a surprised Martin punched him.
The story supports Martin withdrawing from conflict, and Zimmerman advancing.
Pictures from the night show Zimmerman with a gangbanger beard, casual clothes, and looking like someone defending his drug selling turf.
If stand your ground can be transferred out to the public space, and cover situations that you had more than a little to do with causing, it becomes legal murder.
Your home, your car, is your space, chasing a stranger down the side walk you lose the right to space.
I am old, it is hot, I go walking after dark. I take this personally.
My whole relationship with public space just changed, and my response to anyone who stalks me. Where ever I am, I will treat it like being in my home.
So you didn't see the case just what the media said and now you think that things happened exactly the opposite of what was shown during the trial. Where Zimmerman called the cops chased a sneak thief 20 feet then was told to stop and did went back to his truck and was then sucker punched and jumped. Me ive been stalked in public places and its not guys like Zimmerman that are the problem its guys like martin that are a problem to deal with people like Zimmerman you act calm and courteous let them know why you are there what you are doing. If martin had done that he would be alive but he did the exact opposite of that he blindsided a person. Why because that is what criminals like him do they don't think just act on the most greedy an ignorant thoughts they have lucky for us and Zimmerman we still have a system that can sometimes see through biased agendas and give us real justice. Ive learned to deal with people like Zimmerman my whole life they are hot headed and decent people who don't like to leave everything to cops who rarely do anything about crime. So he was watching over his and his neighbors property saw a potential criminal and did what anybody who has a dick and balls would do. If this changes your whole relationship with public space and the people in it then it was a good thing not a bad thing. There is no use in being blind in this world there are lots of guys like Trayvon Martin down in Louisiana so keep that in the back of you head.
Here you are blatantly arguing for vigilanty justice as if Martin deserved to die.......for doing what exactly? It's one thing to believe in Zimmerman's aquital. It's a whole other level of sociopathy to not see this death as a tragedy and even celebrate it.
I think the problem is the law can't reflect the true reality of self defense situations. I train ii self defense regularly, and know that it is messy and uncertain it is. You have enough to focus on besides theoretical legal ideals.
Regarding 'stand your ground' it depend what it actually means in the jurisdiction. My understanding as a foreigner, is it don't relate to this case anyway. The case was never brought on that basis.
Regarding Zimmerman, I do think he felt threatened for his life.
However people wrongly assume Zimmerman's innocence implies Martin's guilt.
It is quite probable and the jury did reflect on this that Martin reaction was because he was threatened. How appropriate his reaction was is debatable, but he was not on trial.
There are criticism of both, in the even leading up to the shooting. However there is a difference from those mistakes, and in the moment self defense. You might say someone contributed to their situation, but everyone should have the right to take legal action in the moment.
The Jury rightly said this isn't a crime but a tragedy.
Last edited by albedo on 23 Jul 2013, 11:36 am, edited 3 times in total.
neilson_wheels
Veteran

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,404
Location: London, Capital of the Un-United Kingdom
No I am not talking about training in gun handling I am talking about training of how to properly identify a threat and proper procedures to handle and if need be disable a possible threat.
I don't believe that your law enforcement officers receive full combat firearm training let alone threat identification and magic ninja tricks. All a bit fantasy I'm afraid.
Vermontservant - A lot of criminals will have a 'stash' spot for weapons that are known by a few individuals. The guns are far too valuable a tool for them to be destroyed.
Last edited by neilson_wheels on 23 Jul 2013, 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
By the story, gun pulled and fired from inches away, where a poke in the ribs would have ended the fight.
The right to defend yourself has to do with where you are. In your home, car, yes, but not standing on the Interstate shooting cars coming toward you.
As The Onion advised Black teens, live naked and fall to your knees and pray, making it hard for anyone to claim you are a threat. It also advised that they did not go out in public, staying home is best.
Now if the Banditos went into a Hells Angels bar, wearing colors, they could claim their lives were in danger, if would be a hard fact to refute. The Angels could make the same claim.
A lot of Black on Black crime is self defense. They never use the defense, they just vanish. That was a, him or me, situation.
The concept of anywhere anytime, and using deadly force against that unarmed girl who slapped you, is pushing reason, even if a martial arts master could kill with a slap.
All you did was tell her she had nice tits and to get in your car and do you a favor. That is not against the law.
The Police who do wander around, mostly wear uniforms, carry guns openly, wear hats, and identify themselves as The Police, for the benefit of blind people. Even in the worst of situations, they yell Police!
Now Zimmerman was not even wearing a hat. Neighborhood Watch is to watch, and call the Police. In Public Places the Police have an exclusive.
Second, I can recall no case where Neighborhood Watch killed an unarmed person for walking down their street. Not even an armed one.
Well, in Texas someone did shoot two burglers who were robbing the house next door. He was not Neighborhood Watch, just Texan. They did not live there and were carrying the TV out. He did call the police, then shot them. They were doing crime.
Zimmerman chased a teen around at night, by car, then on foot, and off the sidewalk, No doubt, this guy is after you, in the dark. That it turned out as it did, if it had been a real burgler, he would have been dead.
Stalking, menencing, are not mentioned in the Neighborhood Watch stuff, except to say, dont do it. When the Police do arrive, they do not park out front, two come from behind, and some guy standing in the backyard with a gun can wind up dead.
Martin had a reason to be there, Zimmerman did not. Martin was returning from the 7/11, and a hundred paces from his door.
I cannot see Martin turning and coming back to the man who has been following him. More likely, Zimmerman charged, closed the distance between them, and a surprised Martin punched him.
The story supports Martin withdrawing from conflict, and Zimmerman advancing.
Pictures from the night show Zimmerman with a gangbanger beard, casual clothes, and looking like someone defending his drug selling turf.
If stand your ground can be transferred out to the public space, and cover situations that you had more than a little to do with causing, it becomes legal murder.
Your home, your car, is your space, chasing a stranger down the side walk you lose the right to space.
I am old, it is hot, I go walking after dark. I take this personally.
My whole relationship with public space just changed, and my response to anyone who stalks me. Where ever I am, I will treat it like being in my home.
So you didn't see the case just what the media said and now you think that things happened exactly the opposite of what was shown during the trial. Where Zimmerman called the cops chased a sneak thief 20 feet then was told to stop and did went back to his truck and was then sucker punched and jumped. Me ive been stalked in public places and its not guys like Zimmerman that are the problem its guys like martin that are a problem to deal with people like Zimmerman you act calm and courteous let them know why you are there what you are doing. If martin had done that he would be alive but he did the exact opposite of that he blindsided a person. Why because that is what criminals like him do they don't think just act on the most greedy an ignorant thoughts they have lucky for us and Zimmerman we still have a system that can sometimes see through biased agendas and give us real justice. Ive learned to deal with people like Zimmerman my whole life they are hot headed and decent people who don't like to leave everything to cops who rarely do anything about crime. So he was watching over his and his neighbors property saw a potential criminal and did what anybody who has a dick and balls would do. If this changes your whole relationship with public space and the people in it then it was a good thing not a bad thing. There is no use in being blind in this world there are lots of guys like Trayvon Martin down in Louisiana so keep that in the back of you head.
Here you are blatantly arguing for vigilanty justice as if Martin deserved to die.......for doing what exactly? It's one thing to believe in Zimmerman's aquital. It's a whole other level of sociopathy to not see this death as a tragedy and even celebrate it.
Here is the argument. Maybe giving him a gun gave him extra courage. Is that a bad thing? In some areas people live in fear of criminals and do nothing about it. Cops have their hands full and if they do get arrested lawyers will argue that they did nothing wrong. Now the criminals are back out on the streets and want revenge. The threats are real and we shouldn't sit hear and pretend that they aren't just because they don't happen in our own backyards.
No I am not talking about training in gun handling I am talking about training of how to properly identify a threat and proper procedures to handle and if need be disable a possible threat.
I don't believe that your law enforcement officers receive full combat firearm training let alone threat identification and magic ninja tricks. All a bit fantasy I'm afraid.
Vermontservant - A lot of criminals will have a 'stash' spot for weapons that are known by a few individuals. The guns are far to valuable a tool to them to be destroyed.
Our law enforcement do. I'm not sure how they do it in the UK but our law enforcement are practically ready for war.
neilson_wheels
Veteran

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,404
Location: London, Capital of the Un-United Kingdom
Well after discussion with a number of people who are knowledgeable on the subject I would have to say you are deluded.
Enthusiasm can sometimes over power experience.
Well after discussion with a number of people who are knowledgeable on the subject I would have to say you are deluded.
I know people in law enforcement here. I know what they are capable of. You can even go on YouTube and look at some of our law enforcement training. Threat identification and how to properly disable a suspect are training procedures. If you can't identify a threat (if you don't know your enemy) how do you expect to properly take them down. Violence level here in the US is high so our police force need to be trained to deal with it. I'm not delusional these are facts and it's all over the web.
Point is and going back to what I was saying about giving people the privileges to carry guns is that if police get this training maybe it would be a good idea for civilians to have this training and not just some watered down can you point a gun away from you training.
neilson_wheels
Veteran

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,404
Location: London, Capital of the Un-United Kingdom
So you know some people, good stories, eh......

So you see some 'premium' training on YT, every US law enforcement officer receives that training?
And cops never suffer injury or death while on duty due to failure to identify threat or unsuccessful application of classroom techniques?
Cops are human too, not robots.
I thought your point was to define and simplify the real life application of SYG law.
Cops are human too, not robots.
Never said they were robots. You said they didn't receive the training. I am saying that they do.
I never said simplify the application of SYG. If we wanted a simple solution then we'd ban guns all together and tell no one to have guns. No I seek to find best practices to compliment the SYG's efforts. If people who have privileges to conceal weapons are better trained. They can efficiently neutralize a target instead of killing them and have a better chance of proving self defense. Now I'm not an idiot I know that this isn't a full proof plan. But it's better than showing someone how to use a gun and then later learn the hard way that defending yourself is a lot harder than it looks.
But I think thats what you cant compare. You call the cops: Trained people, that have routine in such situations, normally are able to keep calm in sterss situations and that are simply the cops. They dont need to follow you for minutes without an uniform, making you moer and more afraid of a criminal following you. Because of them being cops, they have a right to ask you, what you are doing here, and for your documents.
I dont mind anyone calling cops, if he thinks I am suspicious. They are professionals and trained to deal wth such situations in the best way. Thats what they do 9 hours a day, for years.
From my oppinion, that cant be compared with someone instead thinking to play "Wild West Sheriff" himself, following me as a stranger without any non-criminal cause, making me afraid and in the end, as it happened, causing without purpose an needless incident, that one of the involved costs his life. I dont blame him for being a murder, according to my countries laws. But we also have laws against causing someones death, without purpose, by simply acting really dumb and without thinking. Thats not seen as murder, and its absolutly not sentenced as hard as being a murder, its used for typical: "Idiot forget to use handbrake at the car and leaves car, and car starts to roll for itself and kills someone." So its not purpose but a deadly, needless accident, that could easily have been avoided.
And following someone like a criminal would do, causing the person I follow to be afraid, which in the end leaded to a needless confrontation, is for me such a thing. No planed murder, but a needless life gone, out of an dumb action. If it happened that way, sure it was dumb from the victim to hide and try to attack the "criminal" following him, himself, instead calling the police. But playing "Wild West Sheriff" and following a "suspicious" person instead of simply calling the police, as Raptor tells himself, was the first dumb, needless action, starting the series of dumb, needless actions.
That incident was in a gated community that had recently had multiple burglaries.
Zimmerman was found not guilty by the jury. Not guilty means just that, nothing more and nothing less. Doesn't mean he was right or wrong or good or bad but simply not guilty based on the evidence and testimony presented before the jury.
I've never been anywhere, USA or other countries, where people simply walked into stranger's homes. SYG applies to being out of your home but in a place you have a right to be and doing what you have a right to do.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
neilson_wheels
Veteran

Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,404
Location: London, Capital of the Un-United Kingdom
You are misreading again. I said most do not receive FULL COMBAT FIREARM TRAINING, that's not saying they don't go to the range or receive any training.
If people do not understand when the SYG law applies how are they able to act within their rights?
I'm not going to be drawn on the US gun debate. I have much more firearm experience than the average person in the UK, is that relevant to the situation in the US? No.
Last edited by neilson_wheels on 23 Jul 2013, 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I almost didnt see you back there.
Yeah, the law is dangerous to the would be murderer and rapist. Situations that can be defused normally are defused or we’d be hearing more about shootings. And, yes, my attacker ending up dead is better than me ending up dead but I can’t very well expect you to understand that.
Yes, well the law was enacted to help the innocent citizen instead of their would-be killer. If you knew anything about the laws regarding self defense you’d know SYG it’s not a get out of jail free card to be utilized to facilitate vigilantism or settle personal vendettas with. You can, in fact, wind up in prison over an unjustifiable shooting regardless of your self defense claim.
Ah yes; *hoplophobia, paranoia, and the obligatory accusation of racism all neatly rolled into one paragraph. I could feast on this all day, sentence by sentence, and write a mini-dissertation shredding it if I had the time and the inclination.
*Hoplophobia : Irrational, morbid fear of guns. May cause sweating, faintness, discomfort, rapid pulse, nausea, sleeplessness, more, at mere thought of guns.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson