Kurgan wrote:
True. However, since CDs are digital, the digital signal is not a perfect, continuous capture, but a discrete approximation with ones and zeros—and thus, some (usually insignificant) infirmation will be lost. A vinyl isn't bottlenecked by bit depth and sampling rate.
I like vinyl, but it's a lot like a brand new car. It begins depreciating in value as soon as it's purchased. Vinyl, you see, requires more physical handling than a CD, which slowly but surely damages the medium. Also, the whole mechanism by which it is played -- a needle cutting into plastic -- is more destructive to quality than a laser light hitting a CD.
That said, CDs themselves have gone down in quality. A CD made of MP3 files is not as hi-fi as a professionally mastered disc using the raw Redbook or WAV standards. I've heard a lot of commercial CDs nowadays just use MP3 files converted to Redbook, rather than raw masters recorder directly to CD.