heavenlyabyss wrote:
It was meant to be an idealistic post, perhaps with the secondary intention of provocation.
So, your usual hit and run, with some
light trolling thrown in then?
heavenlyabyss wrote:
I do not have an irrational fear of guns. Where I live, gun homicides and suicides and accidents are actually pretty rare (I am lucky to live where I do). So when I walk around the neighborhood I am not afraid to be shot to death or anything like that. If I lived in a worse neighborhood I would probably be even more anti-gun than I am now.
So, you're basing your opinion on
what again? You've just said that you have very little chance of encountering a gun day to day, which is an admission that they're not negatively effecting you, and then declared that you'd not change your mind in different circumstances, without really knowing how you'd feel under such circumstances. Raptor and I can both regale you with stories of anti-gun people who changed their tunes when they needed a gun and didn't have one, so I wouldn't be so quick to write it off.
heavenlyabyss wrote:
My point was simply that the majority of the population doesn't have to hunt and gather for their own food.
Hunting for food is the only use for firearms? Wow, the things I learn day to day, you'd think I didn't have a degree in gunsmithing and over a decade of firearms experience...
heavenlyabyss wrote:
It just seems very strange to me how humans like guns so much. Animals don't shoot guns.
Do I even need to mock you for this? Highlighting it is probably enough.
heavenlyabyss wrote:
Guns and weapons are an example of human innovation gone wrong.
Really now, the tools that allowed us to hunt larger game than we could have brought down with our natural equipment, thus laying the bedrock for civilization as we know it, are "innovation gone wrong"? Or, to talk about firearms specifically, the tool that made it possible for us to get out from under the tyranny of a martial class riding roughshod over the peons, as was the case when being a soldier was a lifetime commitment and armored knights (or samurai, etc) were virtually invincible due to their arms and training? Perhaps you should actually learn about things before deciding you're against them, just a crazy suggestion.
heavenlyabyss wrote:
Again, I am not talking about how things are at this very moment in time. Some people do in fact need guns to protect themselves. My post was meant to be an idealistic comment on how things should be, not how they are.
"How things should be" as decided by someone who knows nothing about the things in question... Great plan.
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez