funeralxempire wrote:
MatchboxVagabond wrote:
funeralxempire wrote:
You're just telling us you're ignorant about Project 2025 without realizing it.
Your telling us you're ignorant about every other plan without realizing it. You don't honestly think that the current SCOTUS situation just happened, go you?
Go on, tell us how much of Project 2025 is recycled from earlier elections/GOP platforms.
You seem very confident in this claim so I'm sure you can inform us with some specifics instead of just broad statements like you've made so far. Clearly you understand this issue much better than every pundit and talking head who's been making the case that it's an existential crisis so now's your opportunity to shine.
Just gonna leave this here:
https://static.project2025.org/2025_Man ... p_FULL.pdfI'm not seeing anything here that's particularly new or particularly more alarming than the stuff they've been doing and saying for decades. And it's not every pundit that thinks this is new stuff. Compared with packing SCOTUS, the extensive gerrymandering and literally rigging of elections, this stuff isn't that bad. We've effectively already lost our democracy, letting the fear morning over things that aren't appreciably worse than what they've already been saying it loud to scare people out of demanding and alternative is just stupid.
I'll also remind you that these pundits that are apparently so smart didn't see Biden's dementia, rigging of primaries, court packing, HRC's loss or the continual throwing off elections by the Democrats as serious problems.
If they really thought that a plan being distributed in public to literally everybody that cared to pick up a copy was as big of a deal as you're claiming they do, they would be demanding that the party give us a real candidate with real support. Which they haven't done. They were fine with a senile candidate and they're fine with one that has a terrible track record as well. At the end of the day, they don't really care, they make money on people watching and being outraged, not in keeping people informed. At any rate, the while thing is rather moot as there will be a project 2029 if this fails because they've been putting these sorts of papers out since the '80s and these same pundits mostly haven't cared. Even Norquist getting politicians to sign fealty oaths out him rather than the country wasn't an issue for them.