Is it WRONG to own guns, rifles, swords, knives, etc.?

Page 3 of 33 [ 523 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 33  Next


Is it wrong to bear arms?
Yes 19%  19%  [ 15 ]
No 81%  81%  [ 66 ]
Total votes : 81

Macbeth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,984
Location: UK Doncaster

13 Sep 2007, 1:51 pm

They banned all handguns in the UK a few years ago, after a particularly nasty school shooting, performed by someone who should have been institutionalised, but wasnt. Did gun crime drop?

NO.

All the ban did was criminalise our olympic shooting team.

As for sword and knives and such.. everyone everywhere, has a huge battery of knives in their kitchen, many of which are much longer than the "legal blade length", and a damn sight sharper. FFS they sell them on the basis you can cut metal with them. You could kill someone with ANY of them.. so where is the point in banning display level weaponry? Half of that is badly made bollocks that would snap if you looked at it, and goes blunt when you touch it with a cushion wrapped in kittens. Likewise, what exactly is the point of banning craft knives, or hunting/survival knives? What are we supposed to cut plastic with? Harsh language? Knives are too broad a spectrum to be bannable.

Theres no point even starting me on axes, for much the same reason. Whilst ever people need to eat, there will be knives, and stabbings.


_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]


greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

13 Sep 2007, 1:53 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
greenblue wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
The_Chosen_One wrote:
Hey, maybe one way to solve it would be if those idiots turned those guns around 180 degrees and blew their own f*cking heads off. Thin the herds that way, and it would save the expense of taking these imbeciles to court.


Quatermass, are you paying attention?

Paying attention to what? you shouldn't feel offended everytime someone disagrees with you, if that's the case.

I think he has a good point. I agree with it.


Class action lawsuit. Suggestion of mass suicide of an entire set of people, by The_Chosen_One.

Do you think he was actually saying to people here to kill themselves?
He was talking in figure of speech you know.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


MysteryFan3
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jun 2007
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,156
Location: Indiana

13 Sep 2007, 3:04 pm

a**holes were murdering other people with rocks and clubs before firearms were invented. People have been murdered with screwdrivers, hammers, wrenches, etc. If a**holes want to murder someone with the least risk to themselves, they will find a way. It isn't bearing arms legally that's causing the problem, it's using them illegally.

While you're banning them why not also ban the above-mentioned tools, nails, boards, saws, all rocks (even decorative), metal rules (especially retractable tape rules), drain cleaners, bleach, tweezers, scissors, pliers, mop/broom handles, plastic bags, large books, electricity, fire, any appliance that one person can lift and carry (and drop on someone), chisels, punches, pencils, pens, bicycle parts, car parts, gasoline, diesel fuel, fertilizer, spray products, wire, rope, string, pest control chemicals, hypodermic needles, water, bottles made of any hard material, ET f*****g CETERA.

Regarding farmers: There aren't enough police to protect every farm 24/7 from roving criminals. They need firearms for self-protection. Yes, some farmers are killed before they can get their weapons while others scare/fight off intruders and survive. I don't know which number is bigger. Enlighten me and back it up with a neutral reference.

Banning obvious weapons is the easy sound bite the politicians latch onto. The real problems are the criminals and what causes them. Hard problems that need hard answers. The pols don't like that. There's no quick glory for re-election in long-term solutions to anything, so we get media blitzed into easy answers until we're brainwashed. Think the answers are obvious? Obvious answers for over ten thousand years are why the human race is knocking on death's door now.

Leave the weapons debate alone and focus on what can be done to properly raise children currently in danger of becoming part of the criminal culture. It will mean compromising some parental rights instead of weapons ownership rights. Refine the definition of conditions hazardous to raising children to add criminal parents. If we need to take kids away from unfit parents and sterilize the parents, do it. If we need more jails, build them. It will cost less to house and feed criminals than to let them wander around and rob and kill. Meanwhile, they can't reproduce and their population declines. Or is breeding out criminals considered genocide? Make a national unfit parents registry and don't let them adopt or reproduce.

I can't name any politician anywhere with the guts to stand up for long-term solutions. I can't name any nation with a population sensible enough to demand long-term solutions. The overall maturity of people in the world is at 13 years old and holding. Go ahead and ban guns. That way, it'll be safer for someone with an illegal gun to kill you.


_________________
To eliminate poverty, you have to eliminate at least three things: time, the bell curve and the Pauli Exclusion Principle. Have fun.


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

13 Sep 2007, 3:08 pm

greenblue wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
greenblue wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
The_Chosen_One wrote:
Hey, maybe one way to solve it would be if those idiots turned those guns around 180 degrees and blew their own f*cking heads off. Thin the herds that way, and it would save the expense of taking these imbeciles to court.


Quatermass, are you paying attention?

Paying attention to what? you shouldn't feel offended everytime someone disagrees with you, if that's the case.

I think he has a good point. I agree with it.


Class action lawsuit. Suggestion of mass suicide of an entire set of people, by The_Chosen_One.

Do you think he was actually saying to people here to kill themselves?
He was talking in figure of speech you know.


For such "figures of speech" people can lose their jobs.



The_Chosen_One
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,357
Location: Looking down on humanity

13 Sep 2007, 5:35 pm

parakeet: that's the kind of BS thinking that has made you rely on that stupid amendment in the first place, and why your nation needs to grow up and stop this bully-boy mentality. FFS, can anybody give me a serious reason why, in 2007, they should need a weapon while walking down to the local milk-bar to get a can of Coke? If your society has become so screwed up that this has to happen, then maybe a mass suicide campaign wouldn't be too far from being a reality. Because technically what you are doing by carrying these weapons is guaranteeing that you WILL be killed, suicide by proxy, so to speak. And for what? Because some outdated piece of legislation allows you to do this? F*cking pathetic. OK, if you all want to carry these stupid weapons and be absolute tosspots, thinning the herds looks like the best option. Oh, and just remember, you can't sue anyone for pointing out the f*cking obvious.


_________________
Pagans are people too, not just victims of a religious cleansing program. Universal harmony for all!!

Karma decides what must happen, and that includes everyone.


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

13 Sep 2007, 5:40 pm

The_Chosen_One wrote:
parakeet: that's the kind of BS thinking that has made you rely on that stupid amendment in the first place, and why your nation needs to grow up and stop this bully-boy mentality. FFS, can anybody give me a serious reason why, in 2007, they should need a weapon while walking down to the local milk-bar to get a can of Coke? If your society has become so screwed up that this has to happen, then maybe a mass suicide campaign wouldn't be too far from being a reality. Because technically what you are doing by carrying these weapons is guaranteeing that you WILL be killed, suicide by proxy, so to speak. And for what? Because some outdated piece of legislation allows you to do this? F*cking pathetic. OK, if you all want to carry these stupid weapons and be absolute tosspots, thinning the herds looks like the best option. Oh, and just remember, you can't sue anyone for pointing out the f*cking obvious.



username88
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,820

13 Sep 2007, 5:46 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
The_Chosen_One wrote:
Hey, maybe one way to solve it would be if those idiots turned those guns around 180 degrees and blew their own f*cking heads off. Thin the herds that way, and it would save the expense of taking these imbeciles to court.


Quatermass, are you paying attention?

Oh give me a break :roll:



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

13 Sep 2007, 5:48 pm

Annoying flamers... :?



The_Chosen_One
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,357
Location: Looking down on humanity

13 Sep 2007, 5:50 pm

Calm down you and stop being so silly, and stop shouting. I have not said anything about mass genocide, or nuking you family or whatever, so get off your soapbox. Quatermass is more than likely going to tell you to pull your head in.


_________________
Pagans are people too, not just victims of a religious cleansing program. Universal harmony for all!!

Karma decides what must happen, and that includes everyone.


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

13 Sep 2007, 5:58 pm

I just reposted what you wrote in case you decide to edit your meaning away. Ad hoc dismissals of vile attacks cannot change what you meant.



snake321
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,135

13 Sep 2007, 5:59 pm

The_Chosen_One wrote:
That second amendment should have been flushed along with the rest of the dunny paper and crap that forms your Constitution. Jesus, will you look at yourselves, everyone running around blowing each others heads off because they are armed, and then the neighbours get bigger guns, then the street gangs get Uzis and rob petrol stations and bottle shops because they have the firepower.... Where will it end? Anyone who thinks that owning a weapon makes them safer should go and visit their nearest mental hospital and book themselves in for an extended stay, because it's the THREAT of these weapons that causes the problem. The only ones that should bear arms are the armed forces and the police, and even the police go too f*cking far. It seems to me that it all hails back to the Wild West days of Jesse James and Billy the Kid. Well, it's 2007 now and those days of 'shoot first and ask questions later' have gone. If Britain and Australia can do without the right to bear arms, then surely you could join the rest of us in the 21st century as well.


Your neglecting to realise that the government DOES have these arms, the 2nd ammendment is about protection from the government going bad. One of the 1st things most dictators do when they come into power is strip the citizens of their arms, rendering them defenseless.



greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

13 Sep 2007, 6:00 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
The_Chosen_One wrote:
parakeet: that's .......

That's very mature of you.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

13 Sep 2007, 6:03 pm

snake321 wrote:
The_Chosen_One wrote:
That second amendment should have been flushed along with the rest of the dunny paper and crap that forms your Constitution. Jesus, will you look at yourselves, everyone running around blowing each others heads off because they are armed, and then the neighbours get bigger guns, then the street gangs get Uzis and rob petrol stations and bottle shops because they have the firepower.... Where will it end? Anyone who thinks that owning a weapon makes them safer should go and visit their nearest mental hospital and book themselves in for an extended stay, because it's the THREAT of these weapons that causes the problem. The only ones that should bear arms are the armed forces and the police, and even the police go too f*cking far. It seems to me that it all hails back to the Wild West days of Jesse James and Billy the Kid. Well, it's 2007 now and those days of 'shoot first and ask questions later' have gone. If Britain and Australia can do without the right to bear arms, then surely you could join the rest of us in the 21st century as well.


Your neglecting to realise that the government DOES have these arms, the 2nd ammendment is about protection from the government going bad. One of the 1st things most dictators do when they come into power is strip the citizens of their arms, rendering them defenseless.


Not to say Australia has bad interest for her people.. yet... :twisted:



username88
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,820

13 Sep 2007, 6:04 pm

I can think of a couple people here being immature, but its not the funny kind its the annoying kind.



snake321
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,135

13 Sep 2007, 6:07 pm

Giving up the 2nd ammendment is basically like telling the government "hey, you can have my rights". Without the right to carry a firearm, you have no means of protecting the other rights. What the hell are you gonna do with your hands, or with a baseball bat, against an organized military complete with guns, choppers, tanks, and mortars?
Yes you COULD argue that even then your out-gunned, but at least it would give you a somewhat fighting chance. I'd rather die fighting than live as a prisoner to an oppressive system.



The_Chosen_One
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,357
Location: Looking down on humanity

13 Sep 2007, 6:19 pm

snake: the protection against bad governing is for EVERYONE to vote at the next election and make sure you get the government you want. What are you going to do with all these weapons if you say that they are for that reason? Start a revolution? OK, while we sit back laughing at how stupid that is, all you private citizens will be waging war on your own government, which just happens to have an army to back it up, and there you go.. pfffffft.

Irresponsible people carrying weapons that are designed to KILL is an accident waiting to happen. Something that is even obvious to Blind Freddie. Also obvious is the mindset that the American people have toward violence; it's a 'kill or be killed' philosophy that should have died when Custer took his last breath, but generations of people have upheld this mindset, and that's why America is in so much trouble. Relying on old laws in modern day society should be done away with, and the Constitution should be rewritten to reflect how society has changed. And if you feel you need the protection of a weapon under that amendment, then obviously you can't have much going for you.

Join the army or the police if you want to bear arms, because really, they should be the only groups entitled to do so.


_________________
Pagans are people too, not just victims of a religious cleansing program. Universal harmony for all!!

Karma decides what must happen, and that includes everyone.