Page 3 of 7 [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next


Are you in favour of the death penalty?
Yes in all cases of murder 9%  9%  [ 5 ]
Yes but only in brutal murder cases 11%  11%  [ 6 ]
Yes but only if a murder is pre-meditated 5%  5%  [ 3 ]
Hang em all, don't need any expensive prisons then 9%  9%  [ 5 ]
No because sometimes the innocent are killed 14%  14%  [ 8 ]
Never. There is no place for it in a civilised society 44%  44%  [ 25 ]
Other? Explain. 9%  9%  [ 5 ]
Total votes : 57

slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

31 Jan 2009, 12:09 am

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Nonsense. I'm a determinist, so I deny that people can be morally responsible for their actions.

But not a universalist? Interesting, so does this mean that people go to hell under your religion for no reason?


Determinism is a philosophy, I think. I wonder what it means ... :chin:



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

31 Jan 2009, 12:09 am

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Nonsense. I'm a determinist, so I deny that people can be morally responsible for their actions.

But not a universalist? Interesting, so does this mean that people go to hell under your religion for no reason?

Have I ever explicitly denied universalism? I remain agnostic on that question, and I think I've expressed that several times in the past.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

31 Jan 2009, 12:11 am

slowmutant wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Nonsense. I'm a determinist, so I deny that people can be morally responsible for their actions.

But not a universalist? Interesting, so does this mean that people go to hell under your religion for no reason?


Determinism is a philosophy, I think. I wonder what it means ... :chin:

Determinism is the denial of free will. Free will lacks a mechanism, and it also lacks a usable definition. Determinism holds that human action is based on a combination of genetic predisposition, internalized beliefs and prior experience (which would be contingent on the environment) as well as potentially some random influences.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

31 Jan 2009, 12:12 am

Quote:
Determinism is the denial of free will.


Then it's also the denial of life itself.



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

31 Jan 2009, 12:26 am

slowmutant wrote:
Then it's also the denial of life itself.

No, that's Cotard's syndrome.



DentArthurDent
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia

31 Jan 2009, 12:49 am

slowmutant wrote:
DentArthurDent wrote:
slowmutant wrote:
I am for the death penalty, but with provisions.

1) It must be a heinous crime that shocks the conscience.
2) The accused displays no remorse.
3) The accused is able to distinguish right from wrong.


Not trying to be snide but doesn't the death penalty go against the teachings of christ and therefore christianity


Separation of Church & State, remember?


I am talking about your and other christians views on the death penalty.


_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams

"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx


history_of_psychiatry
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,105
Location: X

31 Jan 2009, 12:57 am

I voted other because I agree with the death penalty but disagree with how it is handled. I think you should get put to death the EXACT way you kill your victims. I know there would be loopholes but that is justice IMO.


_________________
X


DentArthurDent
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia

31 Jan 2009, 1:16 am

history_of_psychiatry wrote:
I voted other because I agree with the death penalty but disagree with how it is handled. I think you should get put to death the EXACT way you kill your victims. I know there would be loopholes but that is justice IMO.


That makes you exactly as wrong as the person you are murdering


_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams

"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

31 Jan 2009, 2:25 am

DentArthurDent wrote:
history_of_psychiatry wrote:
I voted other because I agree with the death penalty but disagree with how it is handled. I think you should get put to death the EXACT way you kill your victims. I know there would be loopholes but that is justice IMO.


That makes you exactly as wrong as the person you are murdering


Lethal execution is homicide, but it is not murder. Lethal execution is sanction by law and it is bound in its application by a trial procedure with rules of evidence. Unfortunately no system is perfect and occasionally an innocent person is put to death. Which is why I favor penal colonies, rather than terminal execution.

ruveyn



Eggman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,676

31 Jan 2009, 2:54 am

keep aklive for their organs?


_________________
Pwning the threads with my mad 1337 skillz.


Dussel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,788
Location: London (UK)

31 Jan 2009, 2:54 am

I think the whole concept "penalty", "guild", "justice" etc. is wrong totally wrong and based on nothing else than false emotions and cultural tradition.

We had to see "crime" as an accident, with a human how did behave in a way that she/he caused intolerable harm to others; so the question must be not "Who to punish?", but "How to avoid?" or even "How to repair?".

Capital punishment (like the most parts of our justice system) does not work here. Therefore I am against and think we shall find also instead of prisons a more intelligent way of dealing with such problems.



Averick
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,709
Location: My tower upon the crag. Yes, mwahahaha!

31 Jan 2009, 3:05 am

I could never support an imperfect system.



DentArthurDent
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia

31 Jan 2009, 3:34 am

Dussel wrote:
.
Capital punishment (like the most parts of our justice system) does not work here. Therefore I am against and think we shall find also instead of prisons a more intelligent way of dealing with such problems.


Prison should only house those that cannot safely remain at large in the community, and should not be used as a form of punishment, there are far more effective ways to punish people and keep them productive.


_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams

"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

31 Jan 2009, 3:56 am

Averick wrote:
I could never support an imperfect system.


That means you cannot support any system.

ruveyn



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

31 Jan 2009, 8:45 am

Dussel wrote:
We had to see "crime" as an accident, with a human how did behave in a way that she/he caused intolerable harm to others; so the question must be not "Who to punish?", but "How to avoid?" or even "How to repair?".

YES. Instead of just killing people who cause problems, we should try to figure out what's wrong and see if we can fix it.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

31 Jan 2009, 9:11 am

Orwell wrote:
Dussel wrote:
We had to see "crime" as an accident, with a human how did behave in a way that she/he caused intolerable harm to others; so the question must be not "Who to punish?", but "How to avoid?" or even "How to repair?".

YES. Instead of just killing people who cause problems, we should try to figure out what's wrong and see if we can fix it.


I totally agree with your sentiment but the whole criminal system where isolating a group of people in a violently anti-social culture only intensifies their hatred of society and killing them is a solution that somehow gets rid of the problem for a few of them and satisfies the sentiment of revenge that is one of the elements of what is deemed justice. Unfortunately death sentences are very expensive but so far society seems to feel it is worth the price.