Nation Once Again Comes Under Sway Of Pink-Faced Half-Wit

Page 4 of 9 [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9  Next

LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

15 Sep 2010, 7:55 pm

The fact that all WASPs are not affluent and in power does not contradict the hypothesis that most of the people who were affluent and in power have historically been WASPs.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

16 Sep 2010, 12:24 am

LKL wrote:
The fact that all WASPs are not affluent and in power does not contradict the hypothesis that most of the people who were affluent and in power have historically been WASPs.


Where?



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

16 Sep 2010, 3:03 am

go back and read the entire thread up 'till this point.



Meadow
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Dec 2009
Age: 65
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,067

16 Sep 2010, 3:25 am

LKL wrote:
go back and read the entire thread up 'till this point.


My God, you are annoying!



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

16 Sep 2010, 3:43 am

why? 'Keet has been following this thread; if he can't figure out the place the discussion has been about up to this point, then he needs to re-read the thread. I don't owe him an explanation for a lack of understanding that is based on his own lack of reading comprehension.

On the other hand, if he (or you) mean something other than exactly what you say (especially in threads that are have been serious up to the point that you post), you need to keep in mind that this is a forum for Aspies and we expect people to say what they mean. If you are being metaphorical or generalizing or being sarcastic, simple tags like, ''in general," or "examples include, but are not limited to, x," or pseudo-html tags like "{sarcasm}...{/sarcasm}" can go a long way.



kxmode
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,613
Location: In your neighborhood, knocking on your door. :)

16 Sep 2010, 9:39 am

skafather84 wrote:
Image


More like:

Image

8O


_________________
A Proud Witness of Jehovah God (JW.org)
Revelation 21:4 "And [God] will wipe out every tear from their eyes,
and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore.
The former things have passed away."


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

16 Sep 2010, 11:39 am

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
LKL wrote:
The fact that all WASPs are not affluent and in power does not contradict the hypothesis that most of the people who were affluent and in power have historically been WASPs.


Where?

You're kidding? 43.5/44 US Presidents so far have been white. 43/44 have been at least nominally Protestant (perhaps 42 if you want to exclude Jefferson whose religious status is questionable) and 44/44 have been Christian. The overwhelming majority of governors, senators, and congressmen are, and have historically been, white anglo-Saxon Protestants. Virtually all high-paid corporate executives are white. Franky, claiming that WASPs are not in control in America is nothing short of delusional. You are simply numerically wrong.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

16 Sep 2010, 12:23 pm

Orwell wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
LKL wrote:
The fact that all WASPs are not affluent and in power does not contradict the hypothesis that most of the people who were affluent and in power have historically been WASPs.


Where?

You're kidding? 43.5/44 US Presidents so far have been white. 43/44 have been at least nominally Protestant (perhaps 42 if you want to exclude Jefferson whose religious status is questionable) and 44/44 have been Christian. The overwhelming majority of governors, senators, and congressmen are, and have historically been, white anglo-Saxon Protestants. Virtually all high-paid corporate executives are white. Franky, claiming that WASPs are not in control in America is nothing short of delusional. You are simply numerically wrong.


Ah, so it's only America you all are talking about? So what of the all other nations in the world throughout actual recorded history? Were they also the All Despised White Anglo Saxon Protestants that everyone keeps going on to a sickening degree about how such people are inherently evil?



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

16 Sep 2010, 12:51 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Orwell wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
LKL wrote:
The fact that all WASPs are not affluent and in power does not contradict the hypothesis that most of the people who were affluent and in power have historically been WASPs.


Where?

You're kidding? 43.5/44 US Presidents so far have been white. 43/44 have been at least nominally Protestant (perhaps 42 if you want to exclude Jefferson whose religious status is questionable) and 44/44 have been Christian. The overwhelming majority of governors, senators, and congressmen are, and have historically been, white anglo-Saxon Protestants. Virtually all high-paid corporate executives are white. Franky, claiming that WASPs are not in control in America is nothing short of delusional. You are simply numerically wrong.


Ah, so it's only America you all are talking about? So what of the all other nations in the world throughout actual recorded history? Were they also the All Despised White Anglo Saxon Protestants that everyone keeps going on to a sickening degree about how such people are inherently evil?

You somehow missed the fact that this whole thread has been specifically about America?

All of modern history (about 1200AD onwards) has been dominated by white Europeans. And where are you getting this ridiculous notion that whites are despised or inherently evil?


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

16 Sep 2010, 12:56 pm

Orwell wrote:
And where are you getting this ridiculous notion that whites are despised or inherently evil?


Race card. Whenever such things about the WASP's are pointed out, the major defense is essentially a kind of racist reductio ad absurdum. "Oh, so all white people are evil and should feel guilty for oppressing everyone else?"


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

16 Sep 2010, 1:02 pm

skafather84 wrote:
Orwell wrote:
And where are you getting this ridiculous notion that whites are despised or inherently evil?


Race card. Whenever such things about the WASP's are pointed out, the major defense is essentially a kind of racist reductio ad absurdum. "Oh, so all white people are evil and should feel guilty for oppressing everyone else?"


Well, such is no different from what other people do. A race card is often played out by others in this nation in particular who use it to claim discrimination against them when none was intended. White Anglo Saxon Protestants ought to have the freedom to play the race card just as much as anyone else who keeps bringing up years that have long gone by as a means of demanding attention. Oh, and for the record, I'm not Anglo-Saxon, but primarily Franco-Celtic with some amount of American Indian and a goodly variety of other tribes of humankind.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

16 Sep 2010, 1:04 pm

Orwell wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Orwell wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
LKL wrote:
The fact that all WASPs are not affluent and in power does not contradict the hypothesis that most of the people who were affluent and in power have historically been WASPs.


Where?

You're kidding? 43.5/44 US Presidents so far have been white. 43/44 have been at least nominally Protestant (perhaps 42 if you want to exclude Jefferson whose religious status is questionable) and 44/44 have been Christian. The overwhelming majority of governors, senators, and congressmen are, and have historically been, white anglo-Saxon Protestants. Virtually all high-paid corporate executives are white. Franky, claiming that WASPs are not in control in America is nothing short of delusional. You are simply numerically wrong.


Ah, so it's only America you all are talking about? So what of the all other nations in the world throughout actual recorded history? Were they also the All Despised White Anglo Saxon Protestants that everyone keeps going on to a sickening degree about how such people are inherently evil?

You somehow missed the fact that this whole thread has been specifically about America?

All of modern history (about 1200AD onwards) has been dominated by white Europeans. And where are you getting this ridiculous notion that whites are despised or inherently evil?


This thread, yes, the onion quote has to do with this nation in particular. How about prior to 1200 AD? As long as proponents of racism against WASPs keep dragging up the past, lets drag it all up and make generalizations from everywhere so that all grudges of the past may continue ad infinitum.



codarac
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2006
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 780
Location: UK

16 Sep 2010, 1:52 pm

Orwell wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
LKL wrote:
The fact that all WASPs are not affluent and in power does not contradict the hypothesis that most of the people who were affluent and in power have historically been WASPs.


Where?

You're kidding? 43.5/44 US Presidents so far have been white. 43/44 have been at least nominally Protestant (perhaps 42 if you want to exclude Jefferson whose religious status is questionable) and 44/44 have been Christian. The overwhelming majority of governors, senators, and congressmen are, and have historically been, white anglo-Saxon Protestants. Virtually all high-paid corporate executives are white. Franky, claiming that WASPs are not in control in America is nothing short of delusional. You are simply numerically wrong.


Part of your post focuses on WASPS and part just on “whites” (which in the US can include Hispanics, Arabs, Jews and Persians). I’m tempted to ask you to name “all high-paid corporate executives” so we can have a closer look.

What does it mean to say WASPs are in control in America? What are those WASPs who do have power doing to maintain “WASP power”? George Bush was an enthusiastic supporter of Hispanic immigration. Bill Gates has given a large part of his fortune towards helping Africans. Where are the WASP versions of Al Sharpton and Abe Foxman? It should be quite clear that WASP power is generally in decline and has been for some time.

Here is an article celebrating the decline of the WASP:

Quote:
The Triumphant Decline of the WASP
By NOAH FELDMAN
Published: June 27, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/28/opini ... ldman.html

FIVE years ago, the Supreme Court, like the United States, had a plurality of white Protestants. If Elena Kagan — whose confirmation hearings begin today — is confirmed, that number will be reduced to zero, and the court will consist of six Catholics and three Jews.
It is cause for celebration that no one much cares about the nominee’s religion. We are fortunate to have left behind the days when there was a so-called “Catholic seat” on the court, or when prominent Jews (including the publisher of this newspaper) urged President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1939 not to nominate Felix Frankfurter because they worried that having “too many” Jews on the court might fuel anti-Semitism.

But satisfaction with our national progress should not make us forget its authors: the very Protestant elite that founded and long dominated our nation’s institutions of higher education and government, including the Supreme Court. Unlike almost every other dominant ethnic, racial or religious group in world history, white Protestants have ceded their socioeconomic power by hewing voluntarily to the values of merit and inclusion, values now shared broadly by Americans of different backgrounds. The decline of the Protestant elite is actually its greatest triumph.


Here’s another article in a similar vein: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 14574.html

Or there is the book “The Rise and Fall of Anglo-America” by Eric Kaufmann. Here are some reviews:

Quote:
Illuminating...Mr. Kaufmann shows how the culture of 'white Anglo-Saxon protestants,' or Wasps, was constructed and, from the early 20th century, gradually dismantled.
--Christopher Caldwell (Financial Times )

[A] compelling study...Kaufmann writes with admirable detachment and objectivity, and reveals the mechanism by which the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant founders of the U.S. lost their political and cultural dominance. Kaufmann shows how a longstanding cosmopolitan element within Wasp ideology shifted from a symbolic role to the core of national life, and the Wasp population recast their own role accordingly. In other words, they did it to themselves...It is so refreshing to read a generous, open and positive book on this subject--what a pity that it is Huntington who has attracted the attention.
--Nicholas Cull (Times Higher Education Supplement )


And as to the question of whose power has been increasing as WASP power has been declining ...

Quote:

Jewish Power dominates at Vanity Fair
by Nathan Burstien
The Jerusalem Post October 12 2007
http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/Jewish ... x?id=78121

"It's a list of "the world's most powerful people," 100 of the bankers and media moguls, publishers and image makers who shape the lives of billions. It's an exclusive, insular club, one whose influence stretches around the globe but is concentrated strategically in the highest corridors of power.
More than half its members, at least by one count, are Jewish."


Since it is clearly fine to discuss WASP power, I trust I can quote the above article without having to answer to jests about reptilians and such.



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

16 Sep 2010, 2:01 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
This thread, yes, the onion quote has to do with this nation in particular. How about prior to 1200 AD? As long as proponents of racism against WASPs keep dragging up the past, lets drag it all up and make generalizations from everywhere so that all grudges of the past may continue ad infinitum.

Prior to 1200 AD, the Chinese, the Arabs, and the Romans (I guess technically they might be considered white today) were dominant at various times. But I don't really see your point. The claim "Whites are dominant in America" was a rebuttal to your nonsense claim that whites are somehow being oppressed in this country. Whites are in power in almost all major governmental and private offices and we are the majority. How can you claim we're being oppressed? And who's advocating racism against WASPs? Seriously, who out there is in a position to make that kind of threat against the dominant demographic?

I'm sick of your shifting yardsticks and transparent rhetorical ploys. I know I can't expect you to be honest (you would have to admit you're wrong, which you will never do) but you should at least construct better dodges.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

16 Sep 2010, 2:05 pm

codarac wrote:
Part of your post focuses on WASPS and part just on “whites” (which in the US can include Hispanics, Arabs, Jews and Persians). I’m tempted to ask you to name “all high-paid corporate executives” so we can have a closer look.

In this context, "whites" means "Europeans." You can either count or exclude Jews if you want, it doesn't change the overall conclusion.

Quote:
What does it mean to say WASPs are in control in America?

That they dominate our public political life and control the lion's share of the economy. As I already said, 43.5/44 US Presidents to date have been white.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

16 Sep 2010, 5:13 pm

Orwell wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
This thread, yes, the onion quote has to do with this nation in particular. How about prior to 1200 AD? As long as proponents of racism against WASPs keep dragging up the past, lets drag it all up and make generalizations from everywhere so that all grudges of the past may continue ad infinitum.

Prior to 1200 AD, the Chinese, the Arabs, and the Romans (I guess technically they might be considered white today) were dominant at various times. But I don't really see your point. The claim "Whites are dominant in America" was a rebuttal to your nonsense claim that whites are somehow being oppressed in this country. Whites are in power in almost all major governmental and private offices and we are the majority. How can you claim we're being oppressed? And who's advocating racism against WASPs? Seriously, who out there is in a position to make that kind of threat against the dominant demographic?

I'm sick of your shifting yardsticks and transparent rhetorical ploys. I know I can't expect you to be honest (you would have to admit you're wrong, which you will never do) but you should at least construct better dodges.


I'm not claiming that we're "being oppressed", however racism comes in many forms and one of them is the demonizing of one particular set of people. Another is the glorification of another set of people. And yet another is the constant claiming of oppression, which you somehow imagine that I am claiming, so that those making the claim may seek benefits on the basis of otherwise irrelevant criteria.