Page 36 of 100 [ 1585 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 ... 100  Next

DC
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,477

22 Mar 2012, 4:57 pm

puddingmouse wrote:
Even the idea that PIV (penis in vagina) is** sex and that you can't have sex without PIV reflects a patriarchal culture.


Isn't that more of a biological reality to ensure the continuation of the species?

We evolved sex for that reason after all, not as a recreational activity.



puddingmouse
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,777
Location: Cottonopolis

22 Mar 2012, 5:03 pm

DC wrote:
puddingmouse wrote:
Even the idea that PIV (penis in vagina) is** sex and that you can't have sex without PIV reflects a patriarchal culture.


Isn't that more of a biological reality to ensure the continuation of the species?

We evolved sex for that reason after all, not as a recreational activity.


Yeah, but now that sex is a recreational activity most of the time, isn't it time that we went beyond that and included more sources of pleasure? Female sexuality is little understood and that traditional view of sex is the reason why.


_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.


puddingmouse
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,777
Location: Cottonopolis

22 Mar 2012, 5:07 pm

Jono wrote:
puddingmouse wrote:
I did not elaborate enough, by italicising is, I meant 'the idea that PIV is sex and nothing else is sex'. Of course, penis in anus was always included in that definition but that form of sex was taboo in Western cultures until recently (and still sort of is).

That idea is the one that has led to the attitude that lesbians can't have sex because no penis is involved. The penis is taken as the defining attribute of sex. That is phallocentrism.


That really falls under LGBT rights, not women's rights. Also, you've neglected the fact that gay male sex isn't traditionally accepted either (probably even less so).


It falls under women's rights because most women don't have penises. In the traditional view of sex, their pleasures centres are not as important and in some cases ignored altogether.

I'm not neglecting gay male sex in my views on LGBT rights, that is an important issue. It's just not relevant to this particular discussion.


_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.


22 Mar 2012, 5:16 pm

puddingmouse wrote:
Female sexuality is little understood and that traditional view of sex is the reason why.



Female sexuality was little understood. But now it's out in the open since it's no longer taboo for women to admit that they want sex(and enjoy it sometimes).


I suppose though some conservative traditionalists might argue that lesbian sex isn't actual intercourse; just mutual masturbation....But that was before strap-on's were invented. :lol:



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

22 Mar 2012, 5:20 pm

AspieRogue wrote:
But that was before strap-on's were invented. :lol:


It's still not physical sex, though - it's just strap-on dildos being used. So they could still claim that (and no doubt some do).



puddingmouse
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,777
Location: Cottonopolis

22 Mar 2012, 5:23 pm

AspieRogue wrote:
puddingmouse wrote:
Female sexuality is little understood and that traditional view of sex is the reason why.



Female sexuality was little understood. But now it's out in the open since it's no longer taboo for women to admit that they want sex(and enjoy it sometimes).


I suppose though some conservative traditionalists might argue that lesbian sex isn't actual intercourse; just mutual masturbation....But that was before strap-on's were invented. :lol:


I still think it is little understood. We're only really starting to come away from that traditional sexual culture I was talking about.

Some people don't see strap-ons as any different to a dildo, which has masturbatory purposes. So even with a strap-on they still think of it as mutual masturbation. That's because some people still think that sex needs a dick, and they're not just conservatives, but men and women of all stripes. I think intercourse and sex are different things. Sex includes intercourse but isn't limited to it.

Now I want to not move this thread to the Adult forum.


_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.


androbot2084
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,447

22 Mar 2012, 5:52 pm

In the future love and sexuality will be removed from human reproduction because all babies will be hatched in artificial incubators. When this happens society will have to redefine the purpose of sexuality. Although this could open the door to casual sex it could just as well mean the end of casual sex as we know it for sex will have no other purpose than for love.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

22 Mar 2012, 5:58 pm

androbot2084 wrote:
Although this could open the door to casual sex it could just as well mean the end of casual sex as we know it for sex will have no other purpose than for love.


People will do it because it's pleasurable. It will always be pleasurable.



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

22 Mar 2012, 6:04 pm

Tequila wrote:
androbot2084 wrote:
Although this could open the door to casual sex it could just as well mean the end of casual sex as we know it for sex will have no other purpose than for love.


People will do it because it's pleasurable. It will always be pleasurable.


True it is pleasurable but I perfer to have sex with a person rather then my hand :lol:



DC
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,477

22 Mar 2012, 6:05 pm

puddingmouse wrote:
DC wrote:
puddingmouse wrote:
Even the idea that PIV (penis in vagina) is** sex and that you can't have sex without PIV reflects a patriarchal culture.


Isn't that more of a biological reality to ensure the continuation of the species?

We evolved sex for that reason after all, not as a recreational activity.


Yeah, but now that sex is a recreational activity most of the time, isn't it time that we went beyond that and included more sources of pleasure? Female sexuality is little understood and that traditional view of sex is the reason why.


I thought we already had?

Where about in the world are you PM?

Perhaps it is a culture difference that explains why I struggle to get my head around claims that we still live in patriarchal society, where men don't know women have orgasms.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

22 Mar 2012, 6:14 pm

Joker wrote:
True it is pleasurable but I perfer to have sex with a person rather then my hand :lol:


I was talking about sexual activity with other people.



androbot2084
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,447

22 Mar 2012, 6:15 pm

But by eliminating childbirth you are eliminating a painful consequence of sex and this will lower inhibitions and cause society to behave with more promiscuity. So the question remains will the new relationships be based on love or just casual sex?



Joker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)

22 Mar 2012, 6:15 pm

Tequila wrote:
Joker wrote:
True it is pleasurable but I perfer to have sex with a person rather then my hand :lol:


I was talking about sexual activity with other people.


Gosh silly me haha cool yeah sexual activity with other people is great :wink:



puddingmouse
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,777
Location: Cottonopolis

22 Mar 2012, 7:00 pm

DC wrote:

I thought we already had?

Where about in the world are you PM?

Perhaps it is a culture difference that explains why I struggle to get my head around claims that we still live in patriarchal society, where men don't know women have orgasms.


I'm in the UK, but old habits die hard. There's even still a taboo about female masturbation in this country.

I am white British, as well. A lot of men know women have orgasms, but don't seem to care (before some men jump up with, 'well I'm not like that' -good for you, but I know this from my own experience and that of my female friends). It can be just too much work and women who have been conditioned to hate their bodies find it difficult to even achieve orgasm on their own.


_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.


DC
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,477

22 Mar 2012, 7:16 pm

puddingmouse wrote:

I'm in the UK, but old habits die hard. There's even still a taboo about female masturbation in this country.


Really?

Channel 5 has run entire series dedicated to the female orgasm.

Loose women, a long running all women lunchtime show seems to talk about little else.

There are regular news & magazine articles about it.
Research on it, books about it etc etc

Ann Summers grew spectacularly wealthy growing a whole business empire dedicated to it, you are free to order as many sex toys off the internet as you wish in this country.

So I'm struggling to see how female masturbation is 'taboo'.

If it was a taboo subject, surely it wouldn't feature in the national media?

If it was taboo, surely angry mobs should be burning down sex shops that sell vibrators?


Why exactly do you get the impression female masturbation is a taboo subject in this country, I am a genuine loss trying to find the slightest evidence to support this claim.



puddingmouse
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,777
Location: Cottonopolis

22 Mar 2012, 7:28 pm

^

Ask women if they masturbate,. Most of them say 'no'. You might say that's just embarrassment, but what have they got to be embarrassed about?

I don't watch much tv, so I wouldn't know about that.

Also, most sex articles in women's magazines are about 'how to please your man', or if they do feature any method of pleasing yourself, it's usually just technique and doesn't focus on the real source of female sexual dissatisfaction: hatred of one's own body. So on one hand, the media tells women that they can and should be having orgasms, but at the same time guilt trips us into a life of dieting, beauty treatments and even cosmetic surgery before we can feel 'worthy' of to perform this basic biological function. I know from reading those sex articles that the advice they give is superficial, and whilst some of the techniques might achieve a physical reaction, you won't find any real satisfaction from yet another Cosmo article that says 'use ice', or whatever. The media doesn't understand female sexuality, it just sells more by talking about it.

That kind of carrot and stick manipulation is a perfect marketing strategy, really. 'Hey, you might be an ugly b***h right now, but if get a Brazilian, a boob job and a personal trainer, then you can pay for a Rampant Rabbit, so you can have an orgasm like those women on telly do'. Sorry, I know I'm exaggerating a lot there. :lol:

So maybe it's not taboo, just poorly understood and the media isn't actually helping all that much. The real barriers are a culture that promotes a poor self image amongst women (the main issue) and also the residual phallocentric attitudes towards sex (part of the reason why most porn is shot from the penis's POV).


_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.