(Please note that this issue gets into some mild sexual issues. Nothing too severe, but, I do want people to be informed and self-exclude as necessary)
Onanism is a term for things such as coitus interruptus, but also, perhaps more commonly, masturbation.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/onanism
Well, as everybody knows, the internet was created for a reason. That reason is to purvey material to aid with Onanism of the sort that is perhaps more common. This fact is noted throughout culture, such as in music.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiFD6EFVsTg[/youtube] (please note some crudity, and please exclude yourself if you are not a party who feels it is appropriate to watch)
Well, the problem is that Onanism is often condemned by the Judeo-Christian religions. What this entails is that if these religions were successful at suppressing Onanism, they would also have prevented certain institutions, and/or reduce the efficacy of certain institutions, supported by Onanism. Ultimately, the Judeo-Christian religions, if successful, would have prevented the formation of the internet and the freer sharing of information through it, if they were successful at suppressing Onanism. Well, because they seek to be successful at suppressing Onanism, Judeo-Christian religions are indirectly opposed to the internet. Opposing the internet means hating happiness and WP. Ergo, Judeo-Christian religions hate happiness and WP. Do you want to worship in a religion that hates religion and happiness?
PS: I am more STRIDENTLY atheist.