Page 1 of 1 [ 15 posts ] 

Jitro
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 May 2012
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 589

14 Nov 2012, 10:38 pm

Or is it imaginary like unicorns and fairies?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

15 Nov 2012, 10:36 am

Jitro wrote:
Or is it imaginary like unicorns and fairies?


It is a necessary logical abstraction. If we an conceptualize something (an existing something) then we are also force to deal with its negation (that is logic for you). The logical negation of Something is Nothing.

I think the notion of nothing is not only wired into logic, but into or languages as well. We are stuck with the concept and Nothing can be done about it.

ruveyn



Last edited by ruveyn on 15 Nov 2012, 10:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

AProudHillbilly
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2012
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 244
Location: Can-o-duh

15 Nov 2012, 10:41 am

Nothing exists the same way cold does. It exists as a lack.


_________________
Aspie quiz: 167/200 AS, 33/200 NT
AQ: 41
124% Aloof; 132% Rigid; 110% Pragmatic

I accept PMs from females only. Sorry. Personal convictions.


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

15 Nov 2012, 10:45 am

AProudHillbilly wrote:
Nothing exists the same way cold does. It exists as a lack.


Wherever Something is not, Nothing is.

We have this hard-wired urge to plug up the hole.

ruveyn



AProudHillbilly
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2012
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 244
Location: Can-o-duh

15 Nov 2012, 10:48 am

Who knows what dark and dangerous things lurk in those places where nothing is placed.


_________________
Aspie quiz: 167/200 AS, 33/200 NT
AQ: 41
124% Aloof; 132% Rigid; 110% Pragmatic

I accept PMs from females only. Sorry. Personal convictions.


The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,811
Location: London

15 Nov 2012, 2:49 pm

Nothing only existed before the Big Bang.

Now, absolutely nothing, even in a given space, can't exist. You can have nothing in your bank account, but even in the deepest vacuum you're going to have photons and force carriers zooming around.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

15 Nov 2012, 3:09 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
Nothing only existed before the Big Bang.



Not according to a theory proposed by Steinhardt and Turok. The Big Bang is an intermediate event according to their theory.

Please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ekpyrotic_universe

At this juncture their theory makes exactly the same prediction as the B.B. modified by Guth's hypothesis of early extra luminal expansion.

ruveyn



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,135
Location: temperate zone

15 Nov 2012, 4:07 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
Nothing only existed before the Big Bang.

Now, absolutely nothing, even in a given space, can't exist. You can have nothing in your bank account, but even in the deepest vacuum you're going to have photons and force carriers zooming around.


"I got plenty o' nothing. And nothin's plenty for me."

Not only is that not necessarily so: that there is no nothing now- and that true nothing only existed prior to the Big Bang.
The opposite could be argued.

The mass of the universe was not created with the big bang.
It already existed.

Before the big bang the mass of the universe was just concentrated at one point-the singularity.

But...space didnt yet exist. Space expanded with the big bang.

So - on the eve of the big bang- there was the same amount of something that there is now. But there was no nothing. So in the last 13 billion years of cosmic expansion the ratio of nothing to something has actually increased. We have ever increasing amounts of nothing because of the consant expansion of space.



Satanist
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 86
Location: Salem Massachusetts

18 Nov 2012, 2:51 pm

Yes


_________________
When walking in open territory, bother no one. If someone bothers you, ask him to stop. If he does not stop, destroy him.


Krabo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Nov 2012
Age: 247
Gender: Male
Posts: 15,625
Location: Suomi.

20 Nov 2012, 4:28 pm

What does a man love more than life?
Hate more than death or mortal strife?
That which contented men desire,
The poor have, the rich require,
The miser spends, the spendthrift saves,
And all men carry to their graves?

Nothing.

– Leemings, Joseph (1953) Riddles, Riddles, Riddles, New York: Franklin Watts, Inc. –



VIDEODROME
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,691

20 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm

What if you combine Matter with Anti-Matter? Certainly there should be a massive release of energy but isn't that a process of exchanging something for nothing?



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

20 Nov 2012, 5:26 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
Nothing only existed before the Big Bang.

Now, absolutely nothing, even in a given space, can't exist. You can have nothing in your bank account, but even in the deepest vacuum you're going to have photons and force carriers zooming around.


There was no before the Big Bang--just like there's no before 00:00 on a YouTube clip. The Big Bang stems from a singularity with (this is an approximation) no volume and infinite density/pressure; thus it's impossible for time and space to exist "before" the Big Bang according to the general relativity theory.

If there ever was a "before" the Big Bang, then it's because of unlikely scenarios: the universe is oscillating (in which case anything before the Big Bang is erased and can in no way affect us or anything else after the Big Bang) or there are multiple universes (in which case the timeline outside the universe is separate from this timeline).

"Nothing" never existed. It's just a convenient approximation.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

20 Nov 2012, 5:32 pm

Kurgan wrote:
[

"Nothing" never existed. It's just a convenient approximation.


Also an artifact of our language which demands a subject for the verb or an object for the verb whether it exists or not. In this sense the term "nothing" is a syntactical space filler not to be confused with metaphysical entity.

ruveyn



JNathanK
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,177

21 Nov 2012, 5:49 pm

I think there's such a thing as activity, passivity, and neutrality and that "nothing" has something to do with the relationship of the three.



JNathanK
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,177

21 Nov 2012, 5:53 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
Nothing only existed before the Big Bang.

Now, absolutely nothing, even in a given space, can't exist. You can have nothing in your bank account, but even in the deepest vacuum you're going to have photons and force carriers zooming around.


It could have been a homogeneous energy singularity before the big bang. If that was the case, it was neither "something" nor "nothing" at that point. Arguably "nothing" came into being as empty space when the singularity differentiated contrastingly into material energy and void.

On the other hand "something" and "nothing" may be a duality of eternal opposites. The fact that the singularity was pure energy and that it slowed down to form matter when empty space began to emerge makes me think this. The two factors of energy and empty space may have either been a homogeneous thing before the big bang, or they may be two wholly separate dimensions that ultimately exist separate of each other in the pre-big bang conditions, and they're currently colliding or conflicting with each other to create space-time.