Page 21 of 24 [ 369 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24  Next

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

14 Dec 2012, 9:12 am

Raptor wrote:

I think you're thinking of the Emancipation Proclamation that was ordered by Lincoln a few weeks after the Army of the Potomac took a pasting at the battle of Fredericksburg.


Actually the E.P. took place after Antietam. That dunce McClellan managed to snatch a bloody tie from the jaws of victory. Lincoln promulgated the E.P. in an attempt to dissuade Britain and France from recognizing the Confederacy and breaking the Union Blockade. Things did not really turn around for the Union until after the Battle of Gettysburg and the surrender of Vicksburg. With Vicksburg surrendered the Union owned the Mississippi River all the way down to New Orleans.

ruveyn



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

14 Dec 2012, 9:31 am

ruveyn wrote:
Raptor wrote:

I think you're thinking of the Emancipation Proclamation that was ordered by Lincoln a few weeks after the Army of the Potomac took a pasting at the battle of Fredericksburg.


Actually the E.P. took place after Antietam. That dunce McClellan managed to snatch a bloody tie from the jaws of victory. Lincoln promulgated the E.P. in an attempt to dissuade Britain and France from recognizing the Confederacy and breaking the Union Blockade. Things did not really turn around for the Union until after the Battle of Gettysburg and the surrender of Vicksburg. With Vicksburg surrendered the Union owned the Mississippi River all the way down to New Orleans.

ruveyn

The EP took place 1 January 1863, two weeks after Fredericksburg.

Emancipation Proclamation Link


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

14 Dec 2012, 9:46 am

Raptor wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Raptor wrote:

I think you're thinking of the Emancipation Proclamation that was ordered by Lincoln a few weeks after the Army of the Potomac took a pasting at the battle of Fredericksburg.


Actually the E.P. took place after Antietam. That dunce McClellan managed to snatch a bloody tie from the jaws of victory. Lincoln promulgated the E.P. in an attempt to dissuade Britain and France from recognizing the Confederacy and breaking the Union Blockade. Things did not really turn around for the Union until after the Battle of Gettysburg and the surrender of Vicksburg. With Vicksburg surrendered the Union owned the Mississippi River all the way down to New Orleans.

ruveyn

The EP took place 1 January 1863, two weeks after Fredericksburg.

Emancipation Proclamation Link



"When the American Civil War (1861-65) began, President Abraham Lincoln carefully framed the conflict as concerning the preservation of the Union rather than the abolition of slavery. Although he personally found the practice of slavery abhorrent, he knew that neither Northerners nor the residents of the border slave states would support abolition as a war aim. But by mid-1862, as thousands of slaves fled to join the invading Northern armies, Lincoln was convinced that abolition had become a sound military strategy, as well as the morally correct path. On September 22, soon after the Union victory at Antietam, he issued a preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, declaring that as of January 1, 1863, all slaves in the rebellious states "shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free." While the Emancipation Proclamation did not free a single slave, it was an important turning point in the war, transforming the fight to preserve the nation into a battle for human freedom."

This from: http://www.history.com/topics/emancipation-proclamation

The Battle of Antietem was a technical victory, insofar a Lee had to withdraw from the field. In fact it was a dismal failure. McClellan actually found Lee's Order of Battle (by pure luck) but did not act on it. In addition his delay and dawdling cost McClellan the opportunity to anililate Lee's army. The war could have been ended in 1862 saving hundreds of thousands of lives.

ruveyn



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

14 Dec 2012, 10:17 am

Raptor wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
Raptor wrote:

The anti-slavery thing was just something to keep the fire stoked long enough to win the war..


:roll:

Then why was Lincoln in such a hurry to pass the 14th amendment? The White Southerners had their asses thoroughly whupped by then.


:roll:
I think you're thinking of the Emancipation Proclamation that was ordered by Lincoln a few weeks after the Army of the Potomac took a pasting at the battle of Fredericksburg.


:roll:

"Duh."

Fourteenth Amendment wrote:
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.


There is NO WAY that this amendment would have passed if any of the Southern States had had any say in it. :shameonyou:



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

14 Dec 2012, 10:44 am

ArrantPariah wrote:
Raptor wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
Raptor wrote:

The anti-slavery thing was just something to keep the fire stoked long enough to win the war..


:roll:

Then why was Lincoln in such a hurry to pass the 14th amendment? The White Southerners had their asses thoroughly whupped by then.


:roll:
I think you're thinking of the Emancipation Proclamation that was ordered by Lincoln a few weeks after the Army of the Potomac took a pasting at the battle of Fredericksburg.


:roll:

"Duh."

Fourteenth Amendment wrote:
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.


There is NO WAY that this amendment would have passed if any of the Southern States had had any say in it. :shameonyou:


TLDNR
:roll:


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

14 Dec 2012, 11:16 am

ArrantPariah wrote:

There is NO WAY that this amendment would have passed if any of the Southern States had had any say in it. :shameonyou:


That is as sure as sunrise. The Civil War was a necessary evil.

ruveyn



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

14 Dec 2012, 12:12 pm

Most of what passes for conventional knowledge of history is what textbook publishers put in their textbooks. And, what ends up in textbooks is the point of view that school districts want to push. Texas being one of the larger markets, what Texas politicians want to be taught ends up being the point of view pushed in a large part of the nation.

Which is that Northerners were a bunch of racists who didn't give a hoot about slavery; that Negroes were in fact better off as slaves; and that White Southerners were the true victims of oppression.



Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,470
Location: Aux Arcs

14 Dec 2012, 12:24 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:

Which is that Northerners were a bunch of racists who didn't give a hoot about slavery; that Negroes were in fact better off as slaves; and that White Southerners were the true victims of oppression.


Huh???I never saw anything like that in my history books.
Please show the text book and the info you say is in there.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

14 Dec 2012, 1:08 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:

Which is that Northerners were a bunch of racists who didn't give a hoot about slavery; that Negroes were in fact better off as slaves; and that White Southerners were the true victims of oppression.


That is nonsense. Whenever Negro Slaves had the chance to run, they ran. People vote with their feet and choose with their actions.

ruveyn



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

14 Dec 2012, 1:09 pm

Misslizard wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:

Which is that Northerners were a bunch of racists who didn't give a hoot about slavery; that Negroes were in fact better off as slaves; and that White Southerners were the true victims of oppression.


Huh???I never saw anything like that in my history books.
Please show the text book and the info you say is in there.


Well then, what was the slant that your textbooks took on the "War of Northern Aggression", emancipation, and reconstruction?

Raptor had never previously heard of the 14th amendment, and thinks that Pennsylvanians were a bunch of racists who didn't care about ending slavery, when Pennsylvania was a hotbed of abolitionist sentiment.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvan ... on_Society



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

14 Dec 2012, 1:27 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:

Raptor had never previously heard of the 14th amendment, and thinks that Pennsylvanians were a bunch of racists who didn't care about ending slavery, when Pennsylvania was a hotbed of abolitionist sentiment.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvan ... on_Society


From Gettysburg to Reading was a big stretch of the "underground railway" It was no wonder why Lee wanted to do some damage up there.

ruveyn



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

14 Dec 2012, 1:32 pm

ruveyn wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:

Raptor had never previously heard of the 14th amendment, and thinks that Pennsylvanians were a bunch of racists who didn't care about ending slavery, when Pennsylvania was a hotbed of abolitionist sentiment.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvan ... on_Society


From Gettysburg to Reading was a big stretch of the "underground railway" It was no wonder why Lee wanted to do some damage up there.

ruveyn


His reason for the 1863 expedition in to Pa wasn't about the Underground Railroad.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,782
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

14 Dec 2012, 1:33 pm

Misslizard wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:

Which is that Northerners were a bunch of racists who didn't give a hoot about slavery; that Negroes were in fact better off as slaves; and that White Southerners were the true victims of oppression.


Huh???I never saw anything like that in my history books.
Please show the text book and the info you say is in there.


There are text books produced in Texas and distributed throughout the rest of the country in recent years that have had a very conservative viewpoint. This includes notions that the cause of the Civil War had really been states rights, rather than slavery. On top of that, Thomas Jefferson's contribution to American history has been deemphasized in such texts, due to his atheism. One person had wanted to add that the American Civil Rights movement had had unrealistic goals regarding their fight for equal rights for African Americans - but thankfully, that had proven too much even for these text book revisionists.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

14 Dec 2012, 2:24 pm

Raptor wrote:
His reason for the 1863 expedition in to Pa wasn't about the Underground Railroad.


He was aiming for Philadelphia. The idea was to bring the chickens home to the Yankees.

However he was stopped at Gettysburg and whipped thoroughly. Unfortunately that dunce Meade blew the chance to wipe out Lee's army and the war went on nearly another two years. No wonder Lincoln aged rapidly between 1863 and 1865. Between McClellan and Meade he gained a few wrinkles.

ruveyn



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,782
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

14 Dec 2012, 2:30 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Raptor wrote:
His reason for the 1863 expedition in to Pa wasn't about the Underground Railroad.


He was aiming for Philadelphia. The idea was to bring the chickens home to the Yankees.

However he was stopped at Gettysburg and whipped thoroughly. Unfortunately that dunce Meade blew the chance to wipe out Lee's army and the war went on nearly another two years. No wonder Lincoln aged rapidly between 1863 and 1865. Between McClellan and Meade he gained a few wrinkles.

ruveyn


Ironically, the only two generals who grasped Lincoln's understanding of how to conduct a modern war were the drunk Grant, and the madman, Sherman.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

14 Dec 2012, 3:15 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:

Ironically, the only two generals who grasped Lincoln's understanding of how to conduct a modern war were the drunk Grant, and the madman, Sherman.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Lincoln asked for a barrel of whatever it was that Grant drank. As long as Grant was producing results, Lincoln could not care less about his sobriety. Actually it was Grant's smoking habits that did him. All those cigars lead to a case of stomach cancer (probably from the tobacco juice) which finally did him in.

Sherman was dead on right about the nature of war and how to fight it. He wrecked Georgia and then did twice as much to South Carolina where the secession began. Sherman said: The secession began in South Carolina and by God it was going to end there. And sure enough it did. Sherman invented modern war. War against civilians as well as armies.

Those two defective men brought the confederacy and the secession down.

ruveyn