Lintar wrote:
The article itself is extremely biased. Ex:
'Let’s recap. The furor began when the establishment’s co-owner Crystal O’Connor told local news ABC 57 Tuesday, “If a gay couple came in and wanted us to provide pizzas for their wedding, we would have to say no. We are a Christian establishment.” Is that a dumb, shortsighted, inhospitable idea? Sure. Is O’Connor unclear on Biblical policy regarding pizza catering for same-sex unions? Absolutely. (Hint: There is none.)'
Well, there may not be a clear statement within the Bible about serving pizza to "gay couples", but it certainly does condemn homosexuality, more than once (ex. 1 Corinthians 6:9, Romans 1:26-27). Businesses can, if they so choose, refuse to serve someone for whatever reason (it being a private establishment), even if you think the reason given is wrong, and if you don't like what they do or represent then just don't go there. Why should these people, who try to live by what they believe is right, be forced to accept that which they believe is wrong? They're a Christian establishment, so they had no choice really.
So if a private buisiness didn't want to serve someone because they are a racial minority, have a disability ect that should be ok to? Just want to make sure you are consistent. And how does being a christian establishment mean they 'have no choice' its not as if the hand of god will come down and smite them all....the bible was written by humans, thus humans decided homosexuality is 'wrong'....sorry I don't have a crap load of sympathy for bible thumpers thinking they should have the right to discriminate against people because of their 'religion', and if they are to be given such a right I say they should expect negative attention.
_________________
We won't go back.