36 year old female teacher had sex with 14 year old student

Post Reply New Topic

What utter rubbish. No-one, including you, has any insight into the psychological damage, something like that can do and there is no reason to assume that it is more psychologically damaging for a female than it is for a male. She broke the law and should get the sentence any other individual, regardless of their gender, would recieve.

Compared to how long men get put away if they had an affair with an under age, seven years isn't a lot.

Would you say the same thing about a teenage girl that had been abused in this way by a predatory male (or female!) teacher?

This woman is repellent and I hope she has the book thrown at her.



Not only for the underage sex aspect, but also the poisonous breach of trust issue too.

In fact, I would actually instigate a time limit on when teachers can have sex with former students. I would say that a relationship cannot be formed with a former pupil until they turn 18, or some time has passed.

Even if the pupil was eighteen it wouldn't be a good idea,the other students could get jealous,favoritism might be shown to the object of affection.It would be unprofessional.

No. Male and female anatomy are very different. A boy isn't going to get pregnant, and doesn't have a hymen to tear. For us, squirting our rocks off is generally a pleasant sensation, particularly when a lovely woman is involved. For a girl, it is a much bigger deal.

It's got nothing to do with whether or not the victim can get pregnant, the crime is called statutory rape, not reckless reproduction. And you're entirely wrong about there not being the same kind psychological damage. Perhaps browse around for stories on a website like MaleSurvivor if you don't believe me.

Also, for the love of God (and I'm an atheist), please look up the facts about female anatomy before commenting, it's a common myth that the hymen has to tear during a girl's first experience of intercourse, it actually does not.

Yes, I know that statutory rape is the defined crime, and, at least in the USA, applies the same for both genders.



Maybe in some cases. But, I suspect that the harm done to girls by men is greater (on average) than the harm done to heterosexual boys by hawt, randy women.



At least in boys, there is no hymen to tear. And, in standard heterosexual encounters, the boy is not being penetrated, nor having an orifice filled with semen.

By the by, by the age of 14, a boy with an internet connection these days will have already watched umpteen million hours of pornography, and will be masturbating into a sock or tissue at least once or twice per day. I don't see how an intimate interaction with a hawt, randy female teacher will really do him any harm. He may even have a few things to show her.

Under the law here, a teacher can't have sex with students until they turn 18. The age of consent is 16.

It's statutory rape, plain and simple. And the teacher is pregnant?! How many of you really think that this 14-year-old made an informed decision about whether to have (presumably unprotected) sex with his teacher, and risk becoming a father at that age?

She is the one who is pregnant. Not he. She is the one who, at least in some countries, would be carted off to prison. Not he.

The fact that she's pregnant doesn't mean that she wasn't the responsible party in this interaction, nor that he's not going to be a parent long before he was ready to do so because of her actions. Don't get me wrong; a 36 year old man knocking up a 14 year old girl would be physiologically worse for the victim, I agree with you there. But pretending he's not a victim because of his gender just isn't accurate.

Just imagine trying to get child support from a fourteen year old boy.Now some of the men will believe he is a victim.I can't imagine any teenage boy wanting to be a dad at that age,or the financial responsibility that comes with a child.
I don't comprehend what's sexy about a teenage boy.Maybe because I have a son,they just look like kids to me.And you would think a grown woman would know to use birth control.
Not only did she have no morals,she was stupid.

^yeah, I agree with pretty much all of that.

It may come as a surprise to you ArrantPariah but teenage girls are often just as horny and wanting sex from older individuals as teenage boys, and on average are actually more mature mentally. If you want to be consistent therefore you should be fine with teenage sex with either gender.

Also, since you mentioned heterosexual boys earlier, I'm curious: what would your opinion be on a gay 14 year old having it with an adult man? Would you also support that?

Had a similar issues in my country. My oppinion is no else if if was about a male teacher and an female kid.

There is a reason why we, in general, dont want matured persons to be our kids early dating partners. Kids have based upon themselves the need to please others. Its an survival instinct, they are not grown enough to survive on their own, but must relie on grown ups, so they have the instinctive need to please them, to receive that help. During teenager years, there is a major brain-structure-change, causing them to be suddenly far more aware of what they are and what they want, focusing much more on becoming part of their social surrounding (mostly other teenagers), while depending far less on grown ups and their oppinions. Girls have that and boys have that. Some are done with that with 15, some with 20. And because of us not being able to do a brainscan on every teenager, if he already developed independeny from this kiddish "Want to please."-strain, we have age limits.

These age limits might be hard to follow for teenagers, because of them completely weird out of hormon causes and not having experienced to control their new sexuality yet. But a grown up, matured person dont has that excuses. Kids falling in love with grown ups, not being able to physically control that. Ok. Grown ups falling in love with kids, not wanting to physically control that. Not ok. If you are thaaaaaaaat truly in love, then you can as well truly wait, until the younger one has left the forbidden age limit.

Yes, I expect from male gym-teachers to be able to physically control themselves, when doing swimming with the whole class including boys and girls. That there might be some silly thought from now and then, when confronted with an physically already matured 14 year old. Thoughts are thoughts. But in his physical output, reactions, ... I expect him to be in control of himself, and not to behave like an 16 year old with hormon issues, not being able to control his erection when confronted with an 85 year old lady in an bathsuit. If not, he is not acceptable as a teacher. And from an female teacher I expect exactly the same.

Nothing bad about having an sexuality. But if you cant control it, you should not do a job, that even forces you to have the double amount of control, to match up the youths lack of control.