Page 4 of 8 [ 117 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

10 Mar 2014, 6:37 pm

sonofghandi wrote:
sly279 wrote:
the liberal media ignores and censors anything that differs from their ideals.
I see lots of supposed peaceful liberals threaten people who think different then them.


Hmmm . . .
If you take the word "liberal" and replace it with "conservative," the statement would be equally valid.

sly279 wrote:
liberals are more close minded though from my experience. I can get conservatives to understand why we need welfare, but I can't get liberals to see any point but their own.


I find that liberals are more closed minded on certain issues, but conservatives also have their issues on which anything that is not in total agreement will be dismissed or ignored. Especially when it comes to anything labelled "morality" that comes from the religious side of things.


almost all the media is liberal , except fox, but fox isn't conservative, its more slightly leaning right, I hear conservatives complain about fox all the time.

I don't watch any of the big news media, its so biased and race to get info out even if its not true.
Hollywood doesn't hire conservatives , but If i didn't watch shows what would I watch.

Yes tea party conservatives are very close minded on topics like welfare taxes etc, then you have the religious extremist conservatives who are anti gay and abortions. I am religious, but I was raised by open minded Christians. I am aware of and have meet the closed minded ones, they piss me off.

I don't really like either much, though one attacks my rights, while the other defends it most of the time, so I will generally side with them. I wouldn't want them to have complete control as I wouldn't want the liberals having it either.

if liberals weren't so take away guns, take away 1st amendment, get rid of the 4th amendment. I might be one.
They try to pass laws that won't solve the problem, but make them feel good. then when the problem happens again despite their non solution they simply want to pass more laws that won't help but feel good. They tend to say we won't take your guns, but then come for your guns. If the liberals dropped the anti rights s**t and tried to focus on real solutions I'd probably join them. they don't though so I don't have any political mindset to fall under.

so I simply try to support gay rights, reasonable abortions(I'd never do one) while fighting for my rights to be preserved.



Shrapnel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 555

10 Mar 2014, 6:39 pm

Dox47 wrote:
. . . conservative stereotypes are just more inherently dislikable than the liberal ones and that accounts for some of the hate gap. The other prong of my argument is that I don't think a lot of liberals give conservatives the good faith that they should, e.g. presuming that someone who opposes a particular welfare program does so because they hate the poor rather than they think it's inefficient or fosters dependency;


A lesson in irony for liberals.

The Food Stamp Program, administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is proud to be distributing the greatest amount of free meals and food stamps ever.

Meanwhile, the National Park Service, administered by the U.S. Department of the Interior, asks us to "Please Do Not Feed the Animals."

Their stated reason for the policy is because the animals will grow dependent on handouts and will not learn to take care of themselves.



starvingartist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,032

10 Mar 2014, 6:44 pm

Shrapnel wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
. . . conservative stereotypes are just more inherently dislikable than the liberal ones and that accounts for some of the hate gap. The other prong of my argument is that I don't think a lot of liberals give conservatives the good faith that they should, e.g. presuming that someone who opposes a particular welfare program does so because they hate the poor rather than they think it's inefficient or fosters dependency;


A lesson in irony for liberals.

The Food Stamp Program, administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is proud to be distributing the greatest amount of free meals and food stamps ever.

Meanwhile, the National Park Service, administered by the U.S. Department of the Interior, asks us to "Please Do Not Feed the Animals."

Their stated reason for the policy is because the animals will grow dependent on handouts and will not learn to take care of themselves.


because equating poor people to animals is new :roll:



simon_says
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,075

10 Mar 2014, 6:50 pm

Quote:
ayn rand----ugh.

quoted by almost as many misanthropes as nietzche.


Hey, Ayn Rand, Nietzscheism and the attitudes of the Roman patrician class represent the American way. The attitude primarily requires government to protect the property gained through the exercise of their virtue or will. The elite have always stuck close to government for a reason and Rand, Nietzsche and the Roman elite were all snobs who argued that it was well deserved. How many millionaires in Congress today...?

Quote:
More specifically, "conservatism" broadly supports business, "liberalism" (as used here) broadly supports the individual. It's easy to frame giant corporations as "evil", but harder to frame liberals as anything worse than hippies or trade unionists. So I think this dialogue is natural, though obviously not always correct.


Except the folks who say liberals are essentially Nazis because "National Socialism was a far left movement". There is no shortage of bomb throwing on either side.



thomas81
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland

10 Mar 2014, 7:10 pm

Dox47 wrote:
starvingartist wrote:
ayn rand----ugh.

quoted by almost as many misanthropes as nietzche.


Ad hominem fallacy; just because Ayn Rand said something does not make it untrue.

Also, hated by more people that haven't read her work than any other author I can think of.


What, even Karl Marx? I somehow doubt that.


_________________
Being 'normal' is over rated.

My deviant art profile


starvingartist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,032

10 Mar 2014, 7:12 pm

i said what i said about ayn rand because the last thing north america needs is the further promotion of narcissism coupled with increasing income inequality based on "personal merit"--because deep down, don't we all acknowledge that some people ARE just better and are worth more than others?

sure we do.



starvingartist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,032

10 Mar 2014, 7:14 pm

thomas81 wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
starvingartist wrote:
ayn rand----ugh.

quoted by almost as many misanthropes as nietzche.


Ad hominem fallacy; just because Ayn Rand said something does not make it untrue.

Also, hated by more people that haven't read her work than any other author I can think of.


What, even Karl Marx? I somehow doubt that.


funny, marx i've actually read :lol: only because i had to, in college, many moons ago...



The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,809
Location: London

10 Mar 2014, 7:39 pm

3) Ayn Rand
2) Stephanie Meyer
1) Karl Marx

I think most people would agree, two of those are justified.



The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,809
Location: London

10 Mar 2014, 7:53 pm

luanqibazao wrote:

Quote:
but the quote is "plague", not "pox".


Lack of quotation marks or chapter/verse citation makes it an allusion, not a quotation. I reserve the right to modify allusions for my own purposes.
So Shakespeare isn't good enough for you eh?

Someone send this man for re-education at gunpoint! :wink:
Quote:
Quote:
Conservatives don't claim the authority to compel your behaviour at gunpoint, unless you try and murder.


Or gamble, or smoke marijuana, or buy a beer on Sunday morning (or at all, some places). Or marry someone of the same sex. It wasn't libertarians who until recently, historically speaking, made simply being homosexual a criminal act.

Those rules aren't enforced at gunpoint. Unless the USA is worse for that sort of stuff than the UK is.

Of course, the illegality of such things is a great wrong in itself (except perhaps for some forms of gambling, like those machines that exist to eat the money of gambling addicts), but exaggerating to say that behaviour is controlled at gunpoint, well, it makes you look like a shrill.



luanqibazao
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2014
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 754
Location: Last booth, Akston's Diner

10 Mar 2014, 10:02 pm

starvingartist wrote:
ayn rand----ugh.

quoted by almost as many misanthropes as nietzche.


Ayn Rand wrote:
The man-worshipers, in my sense of the term, are those who see man’s highest potential and strive to actualize it. . . . [Man-worshipers are] those dedicated to the exaltation of man’s self-esteem and the sacredness of his happiness on earth. [...] It is a sense of enormous expectation, the sense that one’s life is important, that great achievements are within one’s capacity, and that great things lie ahead.


Misanthropic man-worship ... yeah, that's what it is. Right.



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

10 Mar 2014, 10:23 pm

Misslizard wrote:
I don't see that many conservatives that really take up for the enviroment.

I think you'll find the average rank and file conservative like myself to be quite environmentally conscious BUT in a pragmatic and rational sense. We have to live here but on the other hand we still have to live here, if that makes any sense.

Quote:
I'm sure there are some.If the Conservative party wants to attract younger voters they need to ditch people like Texas Rep.Susan King.I hope she goes to Florida and gets swallowed by an anaconda.I doubt you will find many liberals attending events like this.

I'm more critical of the GOP than conservatives as a whole but collectively we need work on putting a viable 21st century face on in order to draw in and retain more of the electorate. Keep the core values but cut out the excess baggage and dated image.
I hope you realize that liberalism and the Democratic party could use some image work, too.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


TheGoggles
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,060

10 Mar 2014, 10:32 pm

Shrapnel wrote:

A lesson in irony for liberals.

The Food Stamp Program, administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is proud to be distributing the greatest amount of free meals and food stamps ever.

Meanwhile, the National Park Service, administered by the U.S. Department of the Interior, asks us to "Please Do Not Feed the Animals."

Their stated reason for the policy is because the animals will grow dependent on handouts and will not learn to take care of themselves.


Actually, it's so the animals don't associate humans with food so they don't approach people and, you know, try to eat them. Read a book sometime. Your grandpa's forwarded emails don't count.

Quote:
almost all the media is liberal , except fox, but fox isn't conservative, its more slightly leaning right, I hear conservatives complain about fox all the time.


The media is perceived as "liberal" because they don't want to piss off potential customer bases. You don't maximize your revenue streams by declaring a culture war against an entire consumer demographic. It's the free market at work. Don't tell me you don't like the free market! That would make you a baby-stomping Communazi!



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

10 Mar 2014, 10:42 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
billiscool wrote:
when a conservative disagree with a liberal.
Liberal:''whoa,Bro,your like a total hater,you need
to shut up,Man''
other Liberal:''yeah,man,we Believe freedom of speech,
but you Conservative are Like total hater,we can't
have you speak at the convention,Bro''


Here's how I put it: conservatives think liberals are wrong, liberals think conservatives are evil.

Watch, some liberal will come along and try to argue 'but Dox, conservatives are evil' and cite some anecdote or mention some particular conservative jackass and try to generalize that onto conservatives as a whole.

My money's on Kraichgauer, but Auntblabby or Arrantpariah are possibilities, as are a few newcomers to the demonize conservatives game.


Ah, I see my reputation precedes me.
But when have I ever said conservatives are evil? I just strongly dislike how homophobes and racists are more likely to be found in their number. And no, I am not saying all conservatives are racists and homophobes - in fact, most are probably not.

Let me try and explain. I'm not even going to bother to look it up but I assume the US of A has both an active communist and nazi party out there somewhere. Neither party will ever gain any worthwhile acceptance (i.e. votes) because both nazis and communists are immediately associated with oppression, persecution, and genocide because that's simply how they operate when in power. That being the case, they identify with an established party; Republican or Democrat.
To sum it up, the radical right only has conservatives and the radical left only has liberals to dock themselves to in THIS county. I'm not going to stop being a conservaive just because we have some people in white sheets or brown shirts calling themselves conservatives just to become a liberal and associated myself with communists.
Did that make any sense? I'd write a better explanation but I have other threads to deal with.

BTW, in the past three years here in PPR I've come to enjoy the label of evil conservative and all the connotations the left associates with it. :D
Just call it the "win their hearts and minds or burn their damn huts down" mentality of the Vietnam era and accept that we've been in the hut burning phase for a few years now. :twisted:


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Last edited by Raptor on 10 Mar 2014, 10:50 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,470
Location: Aux Arcs

10 Mar 2014, 10:45 pm

Raptor wrote:
I hope you realize that liberalism and the Democratic party could use some image work, too.

Both sides really need an overhaul.There was a facepalm moment when Obama mentioned clean coal.No such coal exists.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

10 Mar 2014, 11:00 pm

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
Raptor wrote:
ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
I still don't know what it is conservatives want besides not to pay taxes. Well that's what everyone wants but we all know that aint ever gonna happen so might as well get something out of what you put in, right? Like roads, schools, services of some kind.
I mean it is time for conservatives to wake up and face the reality. It's taxes. They aren't ever going to go away. They just aren't. Every tax break adds more debt that's the truth. It's not a real break. It is just part of spending.
Most conservatives have no idea what it means to reduce spending all together. It means shrinking the economy. There won't be as much money in circulation. Everyone would lose money in the deal. If the government were to do that, conservatives would suffer too then they would just find another reason to blame the government for their miserable state of mind. It's just misery. Find a hobby for God's sake!! ! Find some joy out of life. Conservatives honestly never seem to be satisfied with anything. If something goes wrong, which, inevitably, it will, they just blame someone else, like the government or liberals. They often have a piss poor understanding of the way the economy works, as in, it's theoretically impossible for everyone to become wealthy. There's just not enough money in circulation for that to happen. So they think if the government will just wave a magic wand and do what the conservative wants he will become wealthy and when whatever he does doesn't create the results he expects, he blames the government. That's all conservatives seem to want to do, pass the blame for every failure in their life onto the government.
Sometimes you just have to face reality and figure out you will not always get your way in everything. It's called growing up.


It's not taxes alone but the inefficiency of how tax revenue is utilized. Conservatives and liberals have separate and distinctly different views on the role of government. That's never going to change.

Quote:
Conservatives honestly never seem to be satisfied with anything.

Yeah right. :roll:
I've never seen a more embittered group than liberals. We have a lot of sourpusses in our camp but nothing like the left.

You conservatives should quit your belly aching and be grateful you live in a place that gives you something in return, especially if you live in the city. If you live in a rural area, you don't get hardly anything from your tax dollars, true.


Oh please. :roll:
We don't get a good enough return on our invested tax money to call it an honest return. Some of the states with the highest taxes have the crappiest roads that they NEVER even patch, let alone totally re-pave. Roads are just one thing.

Quote:
In some countries. the taxes are far worse and the people get nothing, the corrupt government just vacuums the money and it gets sucked into a black hole where it disappears forever. Ever think of that?

Then maybe we'll "liberate" them next. :twisted:


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Shrapnel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 555

11 Mar 2014, 3:46 am

TheGoggles wrote:
Actually, it's so the animals don't associate humans with food so they don't approach people and, you know, try to eat them. Read a book sometime. Your grandpa's forwarded emails don't count.


I'm curious, do you find that gratuitous and bullying insults lend credence to your assertions? And to the point which you've unwittingly proven, it's referred to as a conditioned response. You don't hear of many deer devouring people, but I suppose it happens.

Quote:
“In politics, few talents are as richly rewarded as the ability to convince parasites that they are victims. Welfare states on both sides of the Atlantic have discovered that largesse to losers does not reduce their hostility to society, but only increases it. Far from producing gratitude, generosity is seen as an admission of guilt, and the reparations as inadequate compensation for injustices – leading to worsening behavior by the recipients." ~ Thomas Sowell