"WTF is wrong with Americans? This guy nails it"

Page 2 of 6 [ 88 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,469
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

12 May 2014, 1:26 pm

YourMajesty wrote:
I personally never ''understood'' the USA. Their country and culture seems un-understandable for me, foreign. As far as I know many US people see a functioning, 'social' healthcare system as communism, but why? Why don't they want to pay a relatively small amount to make sure other people's loved ones don't die unnecessarily? And what if they themselves get seriously ill? Because in the USA they just die, right? If they can't afford all the treatment?

And student loans of course is socialism too... I suppose. I'd say it's very liberal because it gives everyone with the same capacities a comparable starting ground. But it seems that as soon as something is to be seen as 'social' or 'helping poor', it's socialism to many and an impairment of freedom/liberty, no matter how much it helps others or how much it helps the country.

What's also strange to me is how many people there seem to really defend the influence of corporations and free market at any cost. Because if you cling to freedom, you should understand that it doesn't matter if a private entity oppresses you or a public one. It's not 'freedom' if some lobbyists can take your liberty away, just because they're not from the government. And they sure as hell aren't thinking and acting in YOUR benefit.

But then again I could be wrong on this all as I'm not an expert on your culture.


Yes plenty of people die due to being unable to afford proper treatment..I mean yeah if you go to the Emergency Room in a hosptial they have to help, but then you might end up in hopeless debt when you get the bill..and depending on what condition got you there it may very well make it even harder to afford ongoing treatment for it so yeah they wont leave someone dying on a hospital bed if they can save them that time but not having access to proper treatment due to cost contributes to the death though in some situations people commit suicide before their condition kills them because they can't afford treatment or to pay their debt.

As for student loans they aren't socialist at all, just more corporate BS....they trick you into thinking you can go to college get a great job with your degree, encourage you take out very high loans that must be paid back....well what happens when there are no jobs in the field you studied for? then you're stuck with a ton of debt and no real way to pay it back. Its really just a trap it seems its not about getting an 'education' its about making social connections to cheat your way to the top....I'd almost go as far as saying its to weed out people that wouldn't make it in the corporate world because they hire more based on social connections then actual qualifications a lot of times with higher paying jobs. Its ridiculous, people are fine being oppressed by corporate america but if the government tries to regulate corporations and promote more social programs and starts serving the people instead of corporate lobbyists, then its an attack on our freedom according to some :shrug: I would honestly prefer a more socialist system....but so long as its not totalitarian socialism and people still have a say.


_________________
We won't go back.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,793
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

12 May 2014, 1:29 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:
trollcatman wrote:
zer0netgain wrote:
Brainfre3ze_93 wrote:
To summarized Americans don't vote rationally, but reactionary.


Americans would gladly support a lot of good ideas if you could (1) prove it would work and (2) prove it won't be abused by the few over the many.

Government has an abysmal track record on both point.


Proof that it works is already there: the countries mentioned above.


The population of all three of those countries combined is less than population of the state I live in America.

America has promised trillions of social welfare. Much more than Sweden, Denmark, Norway. So much is promised that there is no possible way to provide it. The social programs like Social Security and Medicare are expected to be insolvent in ten years or so. And raising taxes is not an option because the numbers are so staggering.

The U.S. Census shows 108 million Americans on some form of means-tested welfare.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/christiner ... e-n1731984

Quoted: "If American welfare recipients were counted as a country, they would be the 12th largest in the world".

We have plenty of social welfare and it is growing. So, don't we have "Socialism" ? Isn't this what Socialism is? Everyone tries to get freebies from the government, and work as least as possible ?

Norway, Sweden, Denmark would go bankrupt if they took on millions of poor people every year.


Social security and Medicare will be insolvent In ten years? Where did you get such information?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,811
Location: London

12 May 2014, 1:31 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:
trollcatman wrote:
zer0netgain wrote:
Brainfre3ze_93 wrote:
To summarized Americans don't vote rationally, but reactionary.


Americans would gladly support a lot of good ideas if you could (1) prove it would work and (2) prove it won't be abused by the few over the many.

Government has an abysmal track record on both point.


Proof that it works is already there: the countries mentioned above.


The population of all three of those countries combined is less than population of the state I live.

America has promised trillions of social welfare. Much more than Sweden, Denmark, Norway. So much is promised that there is no possible way to provide it. The social programs like Social Security and Medicare are expected to be insolvent in ten years or so. And raising taxes is not an option because the numbers are so staggering.

The U.S. Census shows 108 million Americans on some form of means-tested welfare.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/christiner ... e-n1731984

Quoted: "If American welfare recipients were counted as a country, they would be the 12th largest in the world".

If countries with tiny tax revenues can provide it, so can the largest economy in the world. America's GDP per capita is nearly $20,000 more than Finland's, so your talk about population sizes is misleading and irrelevant.

Major savings could be made by drastically cutting military spending and not sending so many people to prison. Tax increases for the rich and closing loopholes would also ensure more money ended up in the public purse. The policy would quickly pay for itself as skilled workers would earn more.

It isn't necessary to go as far as those nations, but your current policy is utterly insane and indefensible. You live in the second richest country in the world (per capita), but you have insane amount of student debt. The current system is broken and not working. A change is necessary or the country will collapse under the weight of the military budget.



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,469
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

12 May 2014, 1:34 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:
trollcatman wrote:
zer0netgain wrote:
Brainfre3ze_93 wrote:
To summarized Americans don't vote rationally, but reactionary.


Americans would gladly support a lot of good ideas if you could (1) prove it would work and (2) prove it won't be abused by the few over the many.

Government has an abysmal track record on both point.


Proof that it works is already there: the countries mentioned above.


The population of all three of those countries combined is less than population of the state I live in America.

America has promised trillions of social welfare. Much more than Sweden, Denmark, Norway. So much is promised that there is no possible way to provide it. The social programs like Social Security and Medicare are expected to be insolvent in ten years or so. And raising taxes is not an option because the numbers are so staggering.

The U.S. Census shows 108 million Americans on some form of means-tested welfare.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/christiner ... e-n1731984

Quoted: "If American welfare recipients were counted as a country, they would be the 12th largest in the world".

We have plenty of social welfare and it is growing. So, don't we have "Socialism" ? Isn't this what Socialism is? Everyone tries to get freebies from the government, and work as least as possible ?

Norway, Sweden, Denmark would go bankrupt if they took on millions of poor people every year.


No that is not what socialism is, Also being on welfare is not about trying to get 'freebies' from the government without having to do any work...its so people who cannot provide for themselves and/or their family have access to financial help so they can afford to live, most people on welfare are on it because they need the help. Don't be so damn ignorant.

Yes there are people who are fraudulent, that takes away resources from people who really need them so even people on welfare are not happy about that....but there are frauds in everything getting rid of all social welfare programs on account of a few frauds taking advantage would really only hurt the people who need it since the frauds could just go commit fraud in some other way.

Also yes america is a bigger country with more people than in scandinavian countries....which also means we probably have more money than those countries, to be accounting for our bigger population. So that is a flawed argument, if a scandinavian country was set up like the U.S essentially but a smaller version I am sure it would soon be experiencing the same problems we are. Its a matter of how resources and money are being used in those countries not that there is less people so they can afford it easier. The U.S wastes a lot of resources and money, compared to those countries.


_________________
We won't go back.


LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

12 May 2014, 1:41 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Social security and Medicare will be insolvent In ten years? Where did you get such information?


Well, it is common knowledge.

However, the trustees who run these programs have testified about their projected insolvency.

Quoted: "Social Security's trust fund reaches insolvency in 2033 while Medicare will be insolvent by 2026 unless the U.S. Congress acts, the trustees' report said"
source, http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2013/05/ ... 370020498/

Right now 38% of all spending goes towards these two programs alone.

You can see here that they are the largest budget items (bigger than defense spending).
source, http://www.usdebtclock.org/


_________________
After a failure, the easiest thing to do is to blame someone else.


LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

12 May 2014, 2:01 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Social security and Medicare will be insolvent In ten years? Where did you get such information?


Well, it is common knowledge.

However, the trustees who run these programs have testified about their projected insolvency.

Quoted: "Social Security's trust fund reaches insolvency in 2033 while Medicare will be insolvent by 2026 unless the U.S. Congress acts, the trustees' report said"
source, http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2013/05/ ... 370020498/

Right now 38% of all spending goes towards these two programs alone.

You can see here that they are the largest budget items (bigger than defense spending).
source, http://www.usdebtclock.org/


Take note:
The projected insolvency of Social Security's disability trust fund in 2016

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2013/05/ ... z31Wt7y1xo


_________________
After a failure, the easiest thing to do is to blame someone else.


LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

12 May 2014, 2:18 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:

No that is not what socialism is, Also being on welfare is not about trying to get 'freebies' from the government without having to do any work...its so people who cannot provide for themselves and/or their family have access to financial help so they can afford to live, most people on welfare are on it because they need the help. Don't be so damn ignorant .


I am not ignorant, but wise. :)

It is not about fraud. People make themselves fit the social program.

- I know people who divorce to make themselves seem poor on paper (the other spouse is wealthy, now one can get some welfare)
- I know people who divorce to get a dead ex-spouse's social security - if they don't yet qualify
- I know people who change their address from a wealthy home (say their parents) to a relative's home that is poor (so programs that look at household income will
see them as poor).
- I know people who quit their jobs to give the appearance of being poor, so they can qualify for aid of some kind.
- I know people who ride out unemployment, and don't bother looking for work.
- I know people who claim they injured themselves (sometimes lieing), get a chiropractor to sign off on it - one that knows the "game" - and onto welfare they go - forever

It would seem like human nature for people to examine every angle of social programs to figure out how they can get some of the free money.

Welfare pays better than minimum wage, so we would expect people working hard to get on welfare, rather than take a minimum wage job.
source, http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapotheca ... 35-states/


_________________
After a failure, the easiest thing to do is to blame someone else.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,469
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

12 May 2014, 2:48 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:

No that is not what socialism is, Also being on welfare is not about trying to get 'freebies' from the government without having to do any work...its so people who cannot provide for themselves and/or their family have access to financial help so they can afford to live, most people on welfare are on it because they need the help. Don't be so damn ignorant .


I am not ignorant, but wise. :)

It is not about fraud. People make themselves fit the social program.

- I know people who divorce to make themselves seem poor on paper (the other spouse is wealthy, now one can get some welfare)
- I know people who divorce to get a dead ex-spouse's social security - if they don't yet qualify
- I know people who change their address from a wealthy home (say their parents) to a relative's home that is poor (so programs that look at household income will
see them as poor).
- I know people who quit their jobs to give the appearance of being poor, so they can qualify for aid of some kind.
- I know people who ride out unemployment, and don't bother looking for work.
- I know people who claim they injured themselves (sometimes lieing), get a chiropractor to sign off on it - one that knows the "game" - and onto welfare they go - forever

It would seem like human nature for people to examine every angle of social programs to figure out how they can get some of the free money.

Welfare pays better than minimum wage, so we would expect people working hard to get on welfare, rather than take a minimum wage job.
source, http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapotheca ... 35-states/


Umm those examples are all pretty much fraud, and if people get caught doing stuff like that the consequences aren't fun from what I understand. I still don't think those descriptions fit the majority of people on welfare. Also welfare varies....not entirely sure welfare would always be more than minimum wage, with my SSI I am pretty sure if I could get a minimum wage full time job I'd make more than I get with that maybe in some cases it is higher than minimum wage...however if someone is already making above minimum wage why would they bother trying to get welfare aside from fraudulent reasons like simply getting more money. So what do you mean its not about fraud?

Also though in my case my welfare will be reviewed, they do check up on people on disability to determine if they are still too disabled to work...so if someone fakes a physical injury there is a good chance they could be found out....also if you know someone committing fraud, report them of course they should face consequences but getting rid of welfare in general would really only hurt people who need it. If I knew someone who was faking I'd most certainly report them since that is not good for people who need the welfare.


_________________
We won't go back.


The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,811
Location: London

12 May 2014, 2:49 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:

No that is not what socialism is, Also being on welfare is not about trying to get 'freebies' from the government without having to do any work...its so people who cannot provide for themselves and/or their family have access to financial help so they can afford to live, most people on welfare are on it because they need the help. Don't be so damn ignorant .


I am not ignorant, but wise. :)

It is not about fraud. People make themselves fit the social program.

The situations you describe are fraud.

However, most welfare payments are not fraudulent. It's an overwhelming majority, actually. And it's mostly the retired doing the claiming.

This uses figures from the UK, but I am sure it is a similar story in the US: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dr-simo ... 47000.html
Quote:
Welfare pays better than minimum wage, so we would expect people working hard to get on welfare, rather than take a minimum wage job.
source, http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapotheca ... 35-states/
]This is a serious problem - those states clearly need to raise the minimum wage, and take minimum-wage earners out of taxation. I strongly suspect that those figures are misleading though. The authors probably haven't accounted for in-work welfare payments.



beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

12 May 2014, 4:59 pm

beneficii wrote:
thomas81,

We Americans are going to get what's coming to us, sooner or later. Whether you vote GOP or Democratic, you are voting for disproportionately high levels of military and punitive spending.

As the military-industrial complex grows out of control, American cities will begin to look like Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, the Tokyo firebombing.

As punitive spending increases and creates an increasingly large disenfranchised and angry young male underclass, with disproportionate impacts on blacks and Latinos, you will see balkanization and bloodshed all across America.

Either way, or if both ways, we're going to get what's coming to us, we Americans will.

John Martin (1789-1854), "The Fall of Babylon" (1831):

[img][800:517]http://i60.tinypic.com/a1nu6x.jpg[/img]


And really, guys, I hope this happens. I hate this country so goddamn f*****g much. It is full of such f**ktards that it really needs to be razed to the ground. Hell, I might be here when it happens and when it does I'll be cheering until my breath is robbed from me in the destruction.

Then when the Replacers come, the society they will build here will far exceed ours in justness. Too bad we Americans currently here won't be around to see it, because all over the world Americans and those who had lived in the U.S. or had ancestors who lived in the U.S. will be hunted down and exterminated to finally rid the world of this filth. Don't think our conquerors will show us the same mercy we showed the Japanese and Germans after WW2, because we will not deserve it. The Replacers will then show the world how it is done.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

12 May 2014, 5:13 pm

/\ Get a grip! :roll:


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


starvingartist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,032

12 May 2014, 5:46 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:

No that is not what socialism is, Also being on welfare is not about trying to get 'freebies' from the government without having to do any work...its so people who cannot provide for themselves and/or their family have access to financial help so they can afford to live, most people on welfare are on it because they need the help. Don't be so damn ignorant .


I am not ignorant, but wise. :)

It is not about fraud. People make themselves fit the social program.

- I know people who divorce to make themselves seem poor on paper (the other spouse is wealthy, now one can get some welfare)
- I know people who divorce to get a dead ex-spouse's social security - if they don't yet qualify
- I know people who change their address from a wealthy home (say their parents) to a relative's home that is poor (so programs that look at household income will
see them as poor).
- I know people who quit their jobs to give the appearance of being poor, so they can qualify for aid of some kind.
- I know people who ride out unemployment, and don't bother looking for work.
- I know people who claim they injured themselves (sometimes lieing), get a chiropractor to sign off on it - one that knows the "game" - and onto welfare they go - forever

It would seem like human nature for people to examine every angle of social programs to figure out how they can get some of the free money.

Welfare pays better than minimum wage, so we would expect people working hard to get on welfare, rather than take a minimum wage job.
source, http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapotheca ... 35-states/


if you actually personally know not one, but several people who do one/all of these things, then you know some seriously sh***y people. either you're a poor judge of character or you live in vegas/a prison/the seventh circle of hell and the acquaintance pool from which you draw, character-wise, is lamentably shallow.



beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

12 May 2014, 5:53 pm

starvingartist wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:

No that is not what socialism is, Also being on welfare is not about trying to get 'freebies' from the government without having to do any work...its so people who cannot provide for themselves and/or their family have access to financial help so they can afford to live, most people on welfare are on it because they need the help. Don't be so damn ignorant .


I am not ignorant, but wise. :)

It is not about fraud. People make themselves fit the social program.

- I know people who divorce to make themselves seem poor on paper (the other spouse is wealthy, now one can get some welfare)
- I know people who divorce to get a dead ex-spouse's social security - if they don't yet qualify
- I know people who change their address from a wealthy home (say their parents) to a relative's home that is poor (so programs that look at household income will
see them as poor).
- I know people who quit their jobs to give the appearance of being poor, so they can qualify for aid of some kind.
- I know people who ride out unemployment, and don't bother looking for work.
- I know people who claim they injured themselves (sometimes lieing), get a chiropractor to sign off on it - one that knows the "game" - and onto welfare they go - forever

It would seem like human nature for people to examine every angle of social programs to figure out how they can get some of the free money.

Welfare pays better than minimum wage, so we would expect people working hard to get on welfare, rather than take a minimum wage job.
source, http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapotheca ... 35-states/


if you actually personally know not one, but several people who do one/all of these things, then you know some seriously sh***y people. either you're a poor judge of character or you live in vegas/a prison/the seventh circle of hell and the acquaintance pool from which you draw, character-wise, is lamentably shallow.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


simon_says
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,075

12 May 2014, 5:53 pm

By the standards of industrialized nations the US does not have high taxes.

And there is no such program as "welfare". There are individual programs that usually have requirements and a lifetime limit.



LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

12 May 2014, 6:37 pm

starvingartist wrote:

if you actually personally know not one, but several people who do one/all of these things, then you know some seriously sh***y people. either you're a poor judge of character or you live in vegas/a prison/the seventh circle of hell and the acquaintance pool from which you draw, character-wise, is lamentably shallow.


This is American life where I live near Detroit. It is relatively poor people.

My income is probably higher than 99% of the people in the area. My old supervisor - who is from Detroit - told me, "I could buy a whole city block in Detroit".

One neighbor is a drug dealer of some kind - cars are always waiting in the street for some reason. Police have been over his house warning him several times. Homes in the area are valued between 30,000-70,000, and at least two on my street are always in foreclosure. The neighbor across from me is in foreclosure now. Two times the home has been broken into and items were stolen. Items have been stolen from my neighbor and from us.

I live in the real world.

It is not illegal to get a divorce to qualify for welfare.
It is not illegal to get a divorce to qualify for your ex-spouse's social security benefits.
It is not illegal to change your address.
It is not illegal to quit one's job.
It is not illegal to qualify for disability/welfare with a doctor's written statement.
It is not illegal to ride out jobless benefits.

This is just the tip of the iceberg when comes to "working the system" to get free money. I am sure experts could point out many other ways
to get the welfare money.

People would think you are "chump" if you aren't trying to get the free money. :)


_________________
After a failure, the easiest thing to do is to blame someone else.


trollcatman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Dec 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,919

12 May 2014, 6:46 pm

beneficii wrote:
And really, guys, I hope this happens. I hate this country so goddamn f***ing much. It is full of such f**** that it really needs to be razed to the ground. Hell, I might be here when it happens and when it does I'll be cheering until my breath is robbed from me in the destruction.

Then when the Replacers come, the society they will build here will far exceed ours in justness. Too bad we Americans currently here won't be around to see it, because all over the world Americans and those who had lived in the U.S. or had ancestors who lived in the U.S. will be hunted down and exterminated to finally rid the world of this filth. Don't think our conquerors will show us the same mercy we showed the Japanese and Germans after WW2, because we will not deserve it. The Replacers will then show the world how it is done.


The Replacers are already here. They are the younger generation of Americans, and they will peacefully replace the older generation, and replace the values and policies of the older generation. I've had this feeling for a while, on many social issues the US and Europe are headed in the same direction (gay marriage, weed, losing their religion), the US is just a few years behind. There was a Pew report from a while back about this (which I can't find at the moment) on the values differences between generations in the US. I think US politics will change a lot when the older voters die (I know it sounds nasty, but I am seeing the same right now in the Netherlands, religion is declining not because of people losing their religion but because of old people dying... and the Christian Democratic Party has been decimated over the last decade).

The US has been through difficult times before, I'm pretty optimistic that they will get their s**t together.

Image