Question about American prohibition?

Post Reply New Topic

I recently watched tv documentary about raise and fall of prohibition.

Apparently some Americans opposed to repealing infamous 18 amendment, not because they think prohibition is good, but because they feared that repealing amendment to American Constitution create bad precedent, i just wondering what is bad in annulling faulty law?

Constitutional Amendments are more than just garden variety statutes. They part of the constitution- part of the foundation of the laws of the land. So you're NOT supposed to take them lightly and mess around with them at every whim- like you're not supposed to impeach every president whom you dont like.

So I suppose that was the reasoning behind the opinion of those folks. But the nation and the Constitution survived the repeal of Prohibition.

You could say that it could potentially set a precedence and I tend to agree.
On the other hand, the 18th was against the spirit of the bill of rights in the first place. The only people that would want to keep prohibition are bible thumpers and health nazis.

Pitty your government doesn't seem to follow the rest of the amendments much. Certainly when it comes to dealing with others in the world, even your most loyal allies.

The film maker Ken Burns created an excellent documentary about the 18th Amendment and the Prohibition years.
First of all, it isn't easy to add an amendment to the US Constitution. A proposed amendment must be passed by a 75% vote in both houses of Congress. The amendment then goes to the states for ratification. When 75% of the states ratify the proposed amendment, it officially becomes part of the Constitution.
I agree that Prohibition was a bad idea. However, that was a different time under different circumstances. Alcoholism was a serious public health crisis at the beginning of the 20th century. Workers were often intoxicated at work at a time when basic safety standards didn't exist. Industrial accidents killed and maimed workers at a time when workers compensation was nonexistent. Prohibition was a desperate attempt to end the destruction caused by alcohol. By no means was it a law forced upon the United States by evangelicals and teetotalers.

it was the only amendment that was prohibitory in nature, restricting rights rather than expanding them. like the OP said, faulty law; nothing at all wrong with repealing it.

Weird, I had no idea this fountain nr where I grew up in London was originally a temperance fountain



I mean it was not anything you would actually drink from, but I know it.

Now that I look at it, seems bloody obvious



It is actually not far from the church of William Wilberforce the key figure of the Abolitionist (slavery) movement.