white_as_snow wrote:
It was self-defence in Europe becuse muslims did attack in many places.
Self-defence ends at your own borders. What the Christians did might (
might) charitably be called a counter-attack.
Quote:
And christians in middle east had a lot of problems with muslims, so the crusaders did go there and gave som help.
Nothing at all to do with the Christian occupation of Jerusalem which began with the slaughter of all Muslims and Jews present in the city, right? Contrast this with Saladin's retaking of the city. Rather than slaughtering all the non-Muslims he allowed them to stay and follow whichever religion they pleased.
Quote:
But not all was in defence, of course.
No s**t.
Quote:
Christian politics did not fire bullets and bombs. It was atheists mixed with christians, the usa army. This is not like a crusade which was 100 % christian.
Soldiers are weaponised humans. They have about as much control over whom they are pointed at as a gun.
Quote:
christian ethics its not about hate and slaves, its about love and peace. without jesus there would be no christians. tell me in what way jesus was a terrible man.
Prove that he was even real, let alone a deity.