The way the system is set up:
We start off under the wings of our parents and whatever they have which sometimes isn't a lot because they are still youngish and in the process of building although in some locations, the trend is going toward parenting while older. Then we spend the best years of our lives, late teens as in 18-19 to around 35, when most of us are healthiest and have the most energy, trying to make money.
As we get older, we acquire more money, so by the time we are something like 70, we have some saved, at different rates, of course.
Then BAM health crises hit, some of us may stand to lose a lot of what we have earned when young and slaving away on a malady that afflicts us in old age more than in youth. Our money goes, our health goes along with it.
Or, we are struggling with lack of drive, energy, bad hips or knees and don't feel like going out and spending our money.
Or, we have family members who we spend the money on, like grand kids and whatnot.
Or, we simply die and never get to have fun with our own money, it just goes to someone else.
It just seems like we have it backwards.
It seems more logical for us to have that money when younger, then earn it through work and bemiserable while older since a lot of times, that's how it is anyway.
Get what I'm saying?
What's so bad about having golden years when young, energetic, adventurous, desiring to go see the world and working when older? I think it's a splendid plan!