cubedemon6073 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
I don't respond well to being told to 'sit down and shut the **** up', those are fighting words.
Well Jacoby, then you accept the maxim "life is not fair" is false and you believe in fighting for fairness and things should be fair. Is this correct?
If it is not correct and one must accept the maxim "life is not fair" is true then you must accept what you consider as unfair which is some people will get welfare and money from the taxpayers for doing absolutely nothing or any other thing conservatives complain about as unfair.
In other words, if a is true then anything that can flow from a must be accepted as true or else you and other conservatives and others who believe in the maxim "life is not fair" have a contradictory and inconsistent standard in your belief system.
Saying 'life isn't fair' isn't fair shouldn't be a mantra, what you are saying tho is just a natural byproduct of means tested benifets that cannot be avoided. Means testing I think creates a poverty trap that encourages fraud, abuse, and dependency while erecting a huge inefficient bureaucracy to manage it all. It would be better just to make this assistance available to everybody, Milton Friedman's idea of a guaranteed basic income is much better than our current welfare system. It's kind of funny since nobody is going to accuse Friedman of being a communist, it is something that is more in line with the free market than what we're currently doing.
I means testing is a big part of the reason why our minority communities have made so little progress and in a lot of regards regressed over the last 50 years because of this poverty trap. There isn't a lot of opportunity for someone to rise out of poverty and once you're on public assistance, it's pretty hard to get off since it's not worth it to work 40 hours a week + lose all your benefits and not come out any better for it.