Linda Stewart (allegèd NDE Survivor) Hypocritical?

Post Reply New Topic

Just needed to get this off my chest after many years of lingering frustrations and drop some Truth-Bombings about that damn Hypocrite. Her dogmatisms, her deceptions, her lies, her arrogance, her dishonesties, she has no idea that many people actually hate her. I wouldn't be surprised if she was "Spirit-Possessed" by the very exact same "Demons" who controlled Fnord's former Church. Spiritual-Leader or Enlightened my Ass. Her real behaviour is actually more like that of Spiritual-Darkness rather than any form of Wise-Enlightenment.

Who?

And what is NDE?

Whatever NDE is it must be bad (since she is alleged to have "survived" it).

Surely you must have heard of the NDE Acronym by now. They claim it's a Near-Death Experience. One of those Altered States of So-Called Reality. Or perhaps Altered Mental-States of Perceptions of Reality. Either way, whatever she experienced hasn't changed her Fundamentalism, she is still a Black-and-White Non-Thinker.

I guess lately I have been too worried about things like "the IRS", who is gonna be our next "POTUS", and about "ISIS", to give much thought to whacky stuff like "UFO's", and "NDE's"! Lol!

The Colour-of-Law Entities that like to pass themselves off as Governments certainly do like to use Three-Lettre-Acronyms in an attempt to make themselves Look and Sound Scientific, and thus Legitimate, even though they are all really Corporations that pretend to be our Government(s). Alas, they are all owned privately, for profit.

Science has been wildly successful at dealing with nature. Therefore, Emulating Science promotes the Impression that it's Useful, and thus we end up having a bunch of Entities that everyone calls Government that Emulate Chemistry, done to claim they are "Scientific". Real science of course improves civilisation.

Whether it be the I.R.S., D.E.A., D.O.D., D.O.E., F.A.A., H.U.D., F.B.I., C.I.A., F.C.C., and any other kind of Chemist-Looking A.B.C., they all essentually fall under the Web or Umbrella of the S.U.C. (Screw U Citizen). The Lawyer-System does it by emulating Latin from the Biological-Disciplines. All Pseudo-Authorities...

B...h is a sexist term if abuse (in the way you used it in your title). So what is it about her beliefs, ideas, claims etc that you are seeking to specifically link with her gender?

The gratuitous casual use of sexism in thread titles can be just as obnoxious as gratuitous sexism in posts, you are better than that?

b***h was used because anything longer than a five-letter-word wouldn't fit in the title...

I have changed your title to remove the sexist slur.

I would still prefer that it refer to her as something like a hypocrite or that she's highly delusional

Ok, I have edited it again along those lines. Please take note of my comments as a guide for the future when you are creating thread titles, Ban Dodger.

I am not seeking to ask a question about that statement though. I was making a statement about her.
Were I to be worried about critics to my opinions about her, I would have made a Haven-thread, rather than PPR.

You can argue for that viewpoint in this thread in this forum. Just don't get into the sexist stuff, OK?

Absolutely no sexism was intended. What is in dispute right now is the fact that there is a Question-Mark at the end of the Thread-Title, when I am not asking for answers from others about whether or not that highly offensive and derogatory hypocrite is a highly offensive and derogatory hypocrite, I am making a statement and a complaint that she is an Highly Offensive and Derogatory Hypocrite. Leaving the Question-Mark at the end makes the very thread-title highly misleading. For ten years that brain-dead cult-promoter hasn't changed one bit.

Surely you know the difference between "Do I have Asperger's" versus "I [claim to] Have Asperger's" ?

The rules are the rules, BD, for us all.

Alright, apparently, I think I might not be being clear enough.
I am going to be forced to make a thread titled : "This is a thread" versus "This is a thread?"

Simply removing the "?" does not in any way make the thread a sexist-thread.