Where does politics end and entertainment begin?

Post Reply New Topic

Barack Obama has gone from “You didn’t build that” to full-blown entrepreneurship. In the New York Post, Isabel Vincent has a story detailing the book deals, production deals, merchandising agreements, and speaking fees that are now bringing in millions for Obama and his wife, Michelle. One detail about Obama Inc. stands out among the rest: the deal the former first family has signed with Netflix. Vincent writes: “The $50 million, multi-year deal calls on the Obamas ‘to produce a diverse mix of content, including the potential for scripted series, unscripted series, docuseries, documentaries, and features.’”

The current occupant of the White House went from television mogul to president of the United States. The previous occupant of the White House is going from president of the United States to television mogul. The circle is closed. In America, the melding of politics and entertainment is now seamless, reciprocal, and altogether frightening.

The ugly symmetries run deep. While Hollywood has infused our entertainment with the schlock moralizing of cheap politics, Donald Trump has infused our politics with the bombast of lowbrow entertainment. As a result, it can be hard to say where entertainment ends and politics begins. Our inability to tell the difference between the two has given way to our accepting their unification. What’s most frightening about the fusing of politics and entertainment is that so many Americans probably don’t see it as frightening at all. And an audience that doesn’t think it’s being taken is most susceptible to propaganda. This goes for Netflix subscribers and Trump-rally attendees alike. So while this union means bad things for our entertainment (a scripted Obama show?), it means terrible things for our politics.

The left has long been adept at using show business to build its brand, but the Obamas are trailblazers. In 2013, Michelle Obama appeared on the Oscar broadcast (courtesy of Harvey Weinstein) to present the award for best picture. And both Obamas have, of course, danced with Ellen DeGeneres. In the last few months of his presidency, Obama went on the Tonight Show to “slow jam the news.” Over comically oozy R&B music, he relayed the news of his many “accomplishments” as president, including Obamacare and the Iran Nuclear deal. All to rock-concert cheers.

Trump had a huge mainstream hit with his reality series The Apprentice, true, but he’s long been adored by pro-wrestling and NASCAR audiences. He’s imported his ringside sensibility to Washington and turned the business of the president into a game of mock rivalries, inflated declarations, and bloodless trash-talking.

This theater—this entertainment—is taken by fans and detractors alike as the stuff of politics.

Trump will undoubtedly fold his brand of populism into his post-presidency ventures. And you can be certain that he, like Obama, will have a presence somewhere in our television universe. For him, that’s home. But by then perhaps we’ll already be talking about Oprah’s presidency—or Kanye’s, or Marianne Williamson’s.

With a taste for politics in our entertainment and entertainment in our politics, we’ve put everything where it doesn’t belong. Elected officials have routines and performers have campaigns. And when the future ratings war between Trump and Obama kicks off, we’ll still be complaining about our lack of serious leadership

Part of the reason Trump was elected, in my opinion, was because he seemed, superficially, to be "one of us."

I don't understand how the statement is germane to the thread topic.

I didn't notice that the text you posted was a link to an article. I'm cautious about thread posts that are simply a link with no additional comments by or personal opinion of the poster as they can often simply be non-commercial political spam.

I have a thick skin too, so if you were attempting to insult my intelligence, it wouldn't be the first time someone has been acerbic toward me. In fact, I've grown to expect it in people generally.

Sorry; you're right; that was unkind and uncalled for.
I simply thought that the author cited was both more eloquent and better researched than myself, therefore rendering any questionable opinion I might express on the topic moot.