Tim_Tex wrote:
If it's to get them involved in the overall decision-making process, then yes.
If it's because they're merely seen as "potential Democrats", then no.
I've observed that regardless of party affiliation, older people tend to be more pragmatic and closer to the center. Younger people are more likely to be drawn to populists.
I can relate to that. I had socialist dreams as a kid and would have fallen for that. The ones pushing for it are all democrats, there was like one odd ball republican. While I do still have equal wealth dreams, it is the way to go, I understand corrupt and greedy people will not allow that, not one equal wealth system exists, and it seems all most if not all socialist countries just ensure particular families stay wealthy while others can't really reach that status unless they are extremely clever. All these mainstream dems pushing for this are power hungry millionaires, seriously doubt they actually want to help people in a big way, they have the money to do so yet don't. Where are the Democrats which want to help everyone, why are they not investing in bad neighborhoods to help the poor get ahead??
It's a good idea to get them involved in understanding, you don't give a rookie the ability to go out on their own and do potential damage, voting on things they aren't educated enough to vote on.