[ POLL ] Morality Laws.

Post Reply New Topic

There is talk, here and elsewhere, about making certain 'immoral' activities illegal.  The reasons vary, and most of them seem to reflect individual religious beliefs.  So, rather than get involved in yet another polarized discussion, I'll just post this poll and ask the generalized question:

"Should civil authorities enforce religious doctrine on morality?"

Please explain your selection, and please keep the conversation civil -- attack the ideas (if you must) and not the people expressing them.  If people start attacking each other, then I will ask the moderators to lock this thread.

You may select only one option in the poll and, as always, you may change your selection at any time.

I chose no, mostly. The only thing I can think of right now that Id find acceptable is murder being unacceptable by most religions, while leaving some wiggle room for killing. Meaning, it could be okay to kill someone in a war situation or self defense or whatever. That's not the same as murder according to some religious texts. I wouldn't get twitchy about that being enforced as a religious rule, so long as it's enforced. I'm not trying to get killed.

The rest of it, I can't think of much that I think should be enforced by civil authorities. I have a bias. Or two. Or more. One, I'm an atheist so I have no religion I feel should be pushed on others and I think confuses me when people do that. I have no problem with people who have a religion, I mean, if it works for you rock on with it. Just don't try to make me conform to it. Another bias, I have been on the receiving end of people who have used religion to abuse me. Some people can and will use anything to justify abuse and sadly religion is on either of those things. Having religion enforced is an idea that sets off bells and whistles in my head. Another bias, I am non binary. There's a few religions out there that dont take kindly to my kind. I don't want to be, say imprisioned for being who I am. I know I'm focusing on the negatives here, but like I said, I have bias and my experiences with religious people have for the most part been negative ones. So yeah, not a fan of that idea.

I would have voted "Hell no!".

I have not heard of anywhere in the western world of there being talk of imposing religious doctrine on a secular state.

Of coarse there are those who want to ban abortion and pornography but that's been a running issue for some.

They absolutely should. Biblical laws are consistent with the way our world was created and are therefore objective. They exist in nature, are measurable, and are tangible. You don’t even have to read the Bible or even believe God exists to infer these laws.

I really don't want to see something like heretics being burned at the stake get normalized again!

So iow I deserve the death penalty for laying with another man because according to the Leviticus 20:13 that makes me an 'abomination'? I fail to see the mercy in imposing that.

My only concern is it seems like modern secular regimes seem to create religious laws unto themselves, like don't be intolerant. To an an extent "nonreligion" can be just as much of an orthodoxy as others, so we should be careful (even in as much I am an atheist).

What is this, the Puritan Age?

Strict separation of church and state is most of the basis for the United States of America.

Saying this, the vast majority of extremely immoral acts are already illegal.

Just because I like to go out without my shirt sometimes—shouldn’t expose me to police attention.